Skip to comments.
Bustamante Leads Schwarznegger in Recall Race [McClintock gettng 21% of GOP Votes]
LA Times (Registration Required) ^
| August 24, 2003
| staff writer
Posted on 08/24/2003 7:26:00 AM PDT by prarie earth
Much of (Arnolds) strategy is based on cross over appeal to non-Republican voters given his comparitvely moderate views on issues such as gun control, abortion and gay rights.
But less than two weeks into his first run for elected office, Schwarznegger has already become a politically polarizing figure.
Roughly seven in ten Democratic voters have an unfavorable impression of the action-movie star, while the same number of likely Republican voters expressed a favorable view.
The actor won the support of 39% of likely Republican voters, 20% of Independents, and 7% of Democrats polled.
McClintock recieved 21% of the Republican vote, Simon recieved 12% and Uberroth 10%.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 401-412 next last
To: prarie earth
PING!
Your One Stop Resource For All The California Recall News!
Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin.
To: sruleoflaw
California is a lost cause, really, so I'm not sure it matters who is elected, because the electorate is its own worst enemy in that state.
But, that being said, AS is head and shoulders below McClintock. When I first heard Arnold was running I thought it was a good idea, and said that I'd even support the campaign if I lived in the State.
But his 'take' on issues (not just one, but many) at the core of Republican ideology have changed my opinion, because they are eviserating and that can't stand. I'm really not a one issue person, Arnold's wrong on many IMO.
And if he said he'd never forgive the party he calls himself a member of, because certain other members of the party chose the selfless path of nailing that SOB Clinton to the wall, I've got a big time problem with that. BIG TIME!
Sometimes a loss is preferable to a win in the long run, and IMO this is one of those times. And it is up to the party faithful to hold those at the Party helm responsible for their choices. If the party fears a serious rift, they'll take heed.
The more Conservative wing of the Party, of which I don't really consider myself a member of, has compromised a lot. They've backed Bush in nearly 100% of his endeavors, to date. Without much grumbling, I might add. That's what being in the wilderness for decades will do. If they want to exert their will at this point in time, I say they've made a good pick w/this Arnold thang.
As JFK said, 'sometimes Party asks too much.' I'm not a 100% convinced this is an illustration of his adage, but convinced enough to support the Conservatives who are opposed to Arnold's gubenatorial (sp?) ambitions.
82
posted on
08/24/2003 9:13:41 AM PDT
by
AlbionGirl
(A kite flies highest against the wind, not with it. - Winston Churchill)
To: autoresponder
hehe! Whoops ! Nothing like getting the height and width parameters reversed, lol ! ...
83
posted on
08/24/2003 9:14:30 AM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
To: veronica
Thanks For The Post
|
Right out of the Boston Redsox Playbook.
Nice Play! Bill Buckner & Mookie Wilson famous photo of 1986 World Series Game Six error by Buckner giving Mets crucial win over Red Sox.
California Republicans
Split The Vote!
SOURCE: Certified List of Candidates ~ PIC ONE!
|
84
posted on
08/24/2003 9:14:31 AM PDT
by
Major_Risktaker
(Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.)
To: medscribe
Dynamics in the state have changed since the election. It is beginning to dawn on more people that liberal politics are killing California. They are ready to consider a genuine alternative--which is why Bustamante's support is WAY below fifty percent.
A lot of Republicans support Arnold only because they believe the fiction that a conservative cannot win. They would support McClintock if Arnold the Liberal would withdraw.
To: AlbionGirl
Great post, Albiongirl.
But is pearls before porcine politicos of the Schwarzenegger variety.
To: KQQL; veronica; Consort; DoughtyOne; MeeknMing
Simon's 6% is gone
Ueberroth's 7% is Fantasy Island on recall day
We all know there are many stealth DNC posters here on FR
They embedded into FR over several years and voice Conservative views or Libertarian agendas
When crunch time comes they espouse leftie newspaper polls and Zogby's twisted numbers
Very transparent
I'm trying to recall that shrink's FR handle
He is quite astute
I just wish these purists would move to my area and become my only business competitors
In south Florida we used mullet as baitfish
Slit out their spines so they would flip and flutter from outrigger poles to attract our big gamefish
As you can see, I am a PREDATOR
I swam with the sharks starting at age eight
I'm still here
I still love shark meat if it is promptly hung, gutted, and bled out to prevent the dreaded amonia taste
Second only to smoked sailfish
At age eleven I was skindiving and killing large barracuda
I'm not a talk show host but most of you that listen to talk radio have heard my voice and daggerlike humor against the libs
The show topic then either goes dead from lib responses or they call up screaming and cursing
It's a good (©) thing!
I love to use leftie sound bytes and stats......
87
posted on
08/24/2003 9:20:21 AM PDT
by
autoresponder
(PETA TERRORISTS .wav file: BRUCE FRIEDRICH: http://tinyurl.com/hjhd)
To: Kevin Curry
If Arnold would withdraw and throw his support to McClintock McClintock cannot win. I suspect you are not going to be voting in this race.
88
posted on
08/24/2003 9:20:49 AM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(Why is the Left afraid of Arnold?)
To: Kevin Curry
Trust me, although I would LOVE to see a conservative win in California, it's just IMPOSSIBLE with the dynamics of California today. Tell me the last time a true conservative won statewide office in California. California has PC and liberalism so stuck up its behind that any candidate who even talks about the real problems (illegal aliens sucking up services monies, out-of-control spending by the state on superfluous things like tofu shakes for homeless people, free condoms for homosexuals in bathhouses, etc) is instantly branded racist by the media and the Dems and run out of town.
Arnold is the only hope for the GOP to pick up the governor's seat in California this year. Do I agree with every single one of his policies? Of course not. Do I believe he's the only GOPer who can win? Yes. And that's why I'm going to vote for him.
To: prarie earth
Roughly seven in ten Democratic voters have an unfavorable impression of the action-movie star, while the same number of likely Republican voters expressed a favorable view.Not news to me. I've been telling those who, based on NOTHING but their own false perceptions, kept saying how Schwarzenegger would split the dem vote, that the above would be the scenario.
Common sense, not foot stamping hysterics, always rule the day.
To: Kevin Curry
Thanks Kevin, I appreciate the kind words. I really was supportive of his campaign until this week. But the more I kept reading about his 'views' the more I began to reject him and his 'take' on things. He's a lightweight who should be shown what the Republican Party stands for, post haste.
91
posted on
08/24/2003 9:25:08 AM PDT
by
AlbionGirl
(A kite flies highest against the wind, not with it. - Winston Churchill)
To: RS
OK, so, if McClintock can't, how is it Arnie can with the same legislature? I mean, they're both republicans, RIGHT?
Hb
92
posted on
08/24/2003 9:25:52 AM PDT
by
Hoverbug
(whadda ya mean, "we don't get parachutes"!?!)
To: sruleoflaw
"YOU GET ARNOLD OUT OF THE RACE. BUZZ OFF VERONICA. MCCLINTOCK STAYS. The RINO goes." and the converse....since a vote for McClintock is a vote for Bustamonte .....enjoy
93
posted on
08/24/2003 9:25:54 AM PDT
by
spokeshave
(Adjusting tag line again....GO ARNIE....)
To: LisaAnne
The liberals may be trying to force Mc Clintock out of the race so that it become a Arnie/Cruz race. Why? I'm thinking they may have some dirt on Arnie and are going to release it close to election (like they did with Bush and the DUI story). Then the cross over voters will go back to Bustamonte and he wins. Are you kidding???
In California, throwing dirt (such as sexual piccadillos or cheatin heart scandals) serves only to increase a person's political stature. It makes them "more human" dontcha know.
Of course I'm being sarcastic, but in California, that's the way many people think.
94
posted on
08/24/2003 9:27:12 AM PDT
by
Edit35
To: medscribe
Well put..but lets see how the Clinton slime machine does with tarring and feathering Arnold in September.
It is a good thing to have 2-3 backup candidates just in case
To: sruleoflaw
I LIVE HERE AND I'M A RADIO TALK SHOW HOST
Nice resume! All this, and knows where the caps-lock key is too!
96
posted on
08/24/2003 9:30:53 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: .38sw
"I have no doubt that the Davis camp (or maybe Bustamonte) have a load of dirt to dump on Arnie." In California, throwing dirt (such as sexual piccadillos or cheatin heart scandals) serves only to increase a person's political stature. It makes them "more human" dontcha know. Of course I'm being sarcastic, but in California, that's the way many people think.
97
posted on
08/24/2003 9:31:18 AM PDT
by
Edit35
To: freeperfromnj
TO ALL THE FAKE CONSERVATIVES PUSHING FOR MCCLINTOCK TO BOW OUT:
That's right. Fake conservatives. Your "punt on first down" strategy betrays you. It's pure cowardice, which is not part of conservatism. If you were genuine, you'd want McClintock to give it his best shot, articulating his positions and gathering as much support as possible, and only THEN, as the election looms much closer, determine whether or not his candidacy has a solid chance of winning, and if not, withdrawing and throwing his support to Arnold (as at least some improvement over the Democrat fascists currently running things).
But instead of encouraging someone who you CLAIM better represents your positions, you immediately badmouth him, call him names, and harass his supporters. This makes you frauds where conservatism is concerned. You are fools, cowards, and worthy of no respect. In fact, it's because of your ilk's self-fulfilling prophecies of doom as you've pushed previous RINO candidates that the presumption exists that a conservative can't win. Had Simon not run an incompetent campaign, he'd be in the governor's mansion now. Now that there's a candidate running an intelligent campaign, getting increasing exposure, you don't have the stomach for a battle. You're more impressed with the "R" on Arnold's name tag than what he may do once in office.
To: dyno35
Excuse me! I am a 3rd generation Californian and certainly do not think that way.
99
posted on
08/24/2003 9:33:41 AM PDT
by
LisaAnne
To: BunnySlippers
Your boy is a flaming liberal. McClintock will accept his endorsement as soon as he has the brains to leave.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 401-412 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson