Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 24 Aug 2003
Various big media television networks ^ | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 08/24/2003 6:06:00 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, August 24th, 2003

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-SC), Rep. Harold E. Ford Jr. (D-TN) and L. Paul Bremer, head of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sens. John McCain (R-AZ) and Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-DE); and Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff .

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark, former NATO supreme allied commander.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Sen. John Edwards (D-NC).

LATE EDITION (CNN) :California Gov. Gray Davis (D); Sens. Richard G. Lugar (R-IN) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA); former Vermont governor Howard Dean (D); California gubernatorial candidate Arianna Huffington (I); former State Department spokesman James Rubin; retired Army Gen. George Joulwan, former NATO supreme allied commander; and L. Paul Bremer head of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: facethenation; foxnewssunday; guests; lateedition; lineup; meetthepress; sunday; talkshows; thisweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: prairiebreeze
A freeper reminded me that Clark has a book coming out this fall.....hence the tease about running for President.

It worked for Powell and he sold lots of books all the while playing the game of maybe I will maybe I won't run for president.

61 posted on 08/24/2003 8:50:04 AM PDT by OldFriend ((Dems inhabit a parallel universe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Timmy
With Bustamonte there might be a possibility of CA defaulting on it's bonds. THAT WOULD BE TERRIBLE
62 posted on 08/24/2003 8:50:55 AM PDT by OldFriend ((Dems inhabit a parallel universe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: chiller
Better there than here.
63 posted on 08/24/2003 8:55:11 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
California bonds, btw, have been rumoured to be part of the reason Buffet become involved with the campaign. What could he do with them, buy 'em all?
64 posted on 08/24/2003 9:03:38 AM PDT by chiller (could be wrong, but doubt it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
THIS WEEK (ABC): Sen. John Edwards (D-NC). Must C TV, huh?
65 posted on 08/24/2003 9:09:27 AM PDT by upchuck (I will pay big bucks for a tag line good enough to make the next "Taglinus FreeRepublicus" post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Russert was in full attack mode against Myers; he has the DNC talking points down to a tee. Myers was a bit flustered at first when Tim essentially asked him why we went to war against a nation that has no WOMD and is not terrorist nation. Myers recovered, but the RATS are clearly on the attack.
66 posted on 08/24/2003 9:13:56 AM PDT by CedarDave (The Dems look for a shadow on the brightest day, call it the dark of night and blame George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Following Myers, McCain and Biden were on MTP (no REAL Republicans there today). Biden was amazing to listen to. We are all wrong on our postwar actions. We need the international community in there, we should have invited them in right after Bush's carrier speech. The UN needs to be in charge of establishing democracy, the UN should be in charge of this, involved in that, etc., international blah, blah, blah. (BTW, since when has the UN been good at setting up democracies?)

McCain contribution was that we need more troops over there, need to spend more money, etc.

Had a USN&WR and LA Times reporters on MTP following the guests. Tim was positively giddy as he read out the latest poll numbers about Bush losing to an un-named Democrat. They pointed to all his negatives now -- bogged down in Iraq, spending way more money than anticipated (unspoken hint at even more deficits), no WOMD found and US troops focus for terrorists all over the mideast, economy is poor (lost more jobs so far than created since 2000), etc. His closing comment, Bush is no certainity for reelection.

67 posted on 08/24/2003 9:26:57 AM PDT by CedarDave (The Dems look for a shadow on the brightest day, call it the dark of night and blame George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
The first half hour of the Georgie show discussed Iraq issues and CA recall issues. The second half hour was devoted to Edwards. Georgie has been featuring one of the nine Rat candidates for president each week.
68 posted on 08/24/2003 9:35:34 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: altura
It's a Meg Ryan thing. I can hardly watch any Meg Ryan movie without wanting to grab her and apply a brush. Apparently all liberal movie directors believe ungroomed women project a favored image of "carefree, tolerant, and hip." LOL Poor Meg, even she has said she hates it.
69 posted on 08/24/2003 10:02:56 AM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
>>>I think that Arnold can run hard right on fiscal conservatism-- he'll release a plan soon, so we'll see if that will be the case-- and pick up the pragmatic McClintock supporters.

I think you're daydreaming. Arnold has said, he will not be releasing any details or specifics of his economic recovery plan for California, until after the recall election. I guess he means, assuming he wins.

This decision by the Schwarzenegger camp, is bad politics and shows that Arnold is an empty suit.

70 posted on 08/24/2003 10:03:15 AM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
I really appreciate the good reporting this morning. thank you.
71 posted on 08/24/2003 10:05:58 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@ Kool-aid drinking, whistle ass democrats go to their graves whining about 2000.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
For a RAT, Ford is OK. I have never heard him ranting the demagogue party line.
72 posted on 08/24/2003 10:07:01 AM PDT by Brasil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
Apparently all liberal movie directors believe ungroomed women project a favored image of "carefree, tolerant, and hip."

What's it called? The "scruffy look"? I agree with you, such appearance is not attractive and it does not convey credibility.

73 posted on 08/24/2003 10:07:47 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Brasil
Wasn't he (Ford) the moderate alternative to Pelousy? Wasn't Rush playing off the racism of Democrats on their lurch far left, leaving Ford (at least partially black) behind?
74 posted on 08/24/2003 10:11:02 AM PDT by Spyder (Just another day in Paradise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Biden's hair plugs have plugged his brain, and made that FAKE SmILE even FAKER.
75 posted on 08/24/2003 10:18:36 AM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
No! Then again, Blinky Edwards doesn't stand a chance of winning the nomination, and may even lose his seat in North Carolina. Couldn't happen to a better guy! Stephie won't be pumping his numbers up, no matter what he says today. So it's wasting air time, and contributes to the downward spiral of This Week WITHOUT David Brinkley. Bwaahhaahaaa!
76 posted on 08/24/2003 10:21:39 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Tim is tilting at windmills. So, Timmy, if Bush's reelection isn't a certainty, then who, pray tell, will be the democratic WINNER of the whole thing in 2004? I don't think there's a single winner in the whole pack. The democrats and their big media helpers are whistling past the graveyard. The election is Bush's to lose, and so far NOBODY running with a D is worthy of more than 40% nation-wide. Oh, and by the way, Hillary, if dumb enough to run, would lose big. Just MHO.
77 posted on 08/24/2003 10:25:47 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
LOL In Seattle we "proudly" call it GRUNGE ;)
78 posted on 08/24/2003 10:32:12 AM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
What you said!! LOL. Edwards is a dead man, politically.
79 posted on 08/24/2003 10:32:55 AM PDT by upchuck (I will pay big bucks for a tag line good enough to make the next "Taglinus FreeRepublicus" post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Wesley Clark was overheard by Freepers during a commercial break at a Crossfire taping as saying he watches "Bowling for Colombine."

Somehow, that just figures. I remember talking to the crew that brought the Chairman of the JCS over to Europe to fire Clark as SHAPE commander.

The guy couldn't even make it through a Clinton Presidency.

80 posted on 08/24/2003 10:34:08 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson