The Coming Of Mexifornia

Hudson Institute Front Page Magazine ^ | 8-22-03 | By John Fonte

[Mr. Mojo]

VIVA LA RAZA! DEATH TO THE ANGLO DOGS!

Cruz, is that you?

[Mr. Mojo]

There is a much bigger war on the horizon that is set to break around 2012, we are in the 1930's all over again

Be more specific. Are you talking China vs. U.S., Islam vs. the rest of the world, or what?

[Joe Hadenuf]

Immigrants Enter Country through 'Gateway' States Before Moving Inland, Census Bureau Says
releases.usnewswire.com ^


Posted on 08/22/2003 6:46 AM PDT by chance33_98




Immigrants Enter Country through 'Gateway' States Before Moving Inland, Census Bureau Says

8/22/03 12:01:00 AM

---

To: National Desk

Contact: Mike Bergman of the Census Bureau Public Information Office, 301-763-3030/763-3620 (fax), 301-457-1037 (TDD), 2000usa@census.gov

WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 /U.S. Newswire/ -- About 60 percent of the 5.6 million foreign-born population who moved to the United States between 1995 and 2000 entered the country through six "gateway" states (California, New York, Texas, Florida, Illinois and New Jersey), an analysis of Census 2000 data shows.

At the same time, three of the gateway states New York, California and Illinois had considerable net out-migration of their foreign-born populations to other states between 1995 and 2000. New Jersey was the only gateway state to have net out-migration of natives but net in-migration of foreign-born people.

"One of the major findings of Census 2000 was the overall size of the foreign-born population and its presence in areas outside the traditional immigration gateways such as California, New York and Texas," said Census Bureau Director Louis Kincannon. "Like the Westward migration of immigrants in centuries past, their movements remind us that opportunities abound throughout our country."

Among the biggest beneficiaries of secondary migration, i.e., foreign-born migrants from other states, were North Carolina (76,000) and Nevada (73,000). Nevada had more foreign-born migrants from other states than it did from abroad.

The new Census Bureau report, Migration of Natives and the Foreign Born: 1995 to 2000, examined Census 2000 data to compare migration patterns for natives (people born in the United States) with people born abroad.

Among the report's findings:

-- Domestic migration patterns of foreign-born and native migrants were similar, with common destinations.

-- Between 1995 and 2000, California's net out-migration rate to other states for its foreign-born people (30.4 people lost per 1,000 foreign-born residents in 1995) was higher than its net out-migration rate for natives (22.6 people lost per 1,000 native residents in 1995).

-- California was responsible for most foreign-born migrants to Georgia, with 19,000 making the cross-country move during the five-year period.

-- Nevada had the highest net migration rate of foreign-born migrants from other states, gaining 276 people for every 1,000 foreign-born residents in 1995, while Florida had the largest net migration gain of foreign-born migrants from other states: 89,000.

-- Some states and counties in the Midwest had net domestic out-migration of natives but net domestic in-migration of the foreign-born population. For example, Nebraska and Kansas had native net out-migration rates of 13.1 and 5.2, but foreign-born net in-migration rates of 101.0 and 47.6, respectively.

The report and supplementary data tables, as well as previously published migration reports, are available on the Internet at http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/migration.html.

Editor's Note: The report can be accessed at http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/p70-92.pdf.

[Mr. Mojo]

Interesting stuff. I had no idea Illinois was a "gateway" state.

[LibertyAndJusticeForAll]

Thanks, I saw this thread. It is difficult to believe that something so obvious warranted a government study and report.

[Imal]

"Cruz, is that you?"

Sorry, I visited the Aztlan.Net and La Raza websites and got carried away.

And I'm not even a Latino!

[Mr. Mojo]

That Aztlan site is something else. I see they're "in solidarity with the Palestinian sruggle" as well. No surprise there.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Bump

[LiteKeeper]

INTREP

[Captainpaintball]

A litle over a month ago, a caller to the Bob Grant show mentioned that when he wondered aloud to his "hispanic" friend why his children didn't speak English, his "hispanic" friend told him: "Amigo, it is YOU that will have to learn SPANISH!!!"

[jethropalerobber]

The Coming Of Mexifornia

more "the return" than "the coming" isn't it?

[Imal]

"That Aztlan site is something else. I see they're "in solidarity with the Palestinian sruggle" as well. No surprise there."

Yeah, they don't seem to like Jews very much. The article titled The Manjewrian Candidate sort of lets that out of the bag. It's a real corker, explaining how the Jews put Gray Davis in power.

That and the campaign to boycott Israeli goods to Help end Racist Zionist Apartheid in Israel!, with the thumbnail below, leaves little to the imagination.

I get the strong impression that non-Hispanics, and Jews in particular, will not be welcome once Aztlan is established atop the ashes of California, Arizona and New Mexico.

[Fledermaus]

If you took time to check actual facts, you'll find that a there are just as many left wing liberals in charge of giant corporations as the "right" supposedly control.

[Mr. Mojo]

The Manjewrian Candidate

LOL....That was probably the nuttiest article I've ever read -- a veritable tinfoil-palooza.

I get the strong impression that non-Hispanics, and Jews in particular, will not be welcome once Aztlan is established atop the ashes of California, Arizona and New Mexico.

I get the same impression, although you left out Nevada for some reason ;) ....Actually, I vaguely remember seeing a map of the territory those sickos consider "Aztlan" and it encompassed a few more states that we just listed.

[Imal]

I get the same impression, although you left out Nevada for some reason ;)

I live in Nevada, so it must be some sort of subconscious repression of that idea.

Well, that and the fact that I and my neighbors are well-armed and are not planning any citizenship changes in our lifetimes.

Oh, and P.S. to the unwary: the anti-Israel stuff on the Aztlan website is apparently straight from the Fatah website and can be a bit graphic for most tastes. Specifically, lots of pictures of dead Palestinians (but curiously, not one dead Israeli that I coud see). Go figure.

I'll probably do an article on the Aztlan website. It's a goldmine, IMO.

[Porterville]

Socialism man, it's all around and suffocating the world. In Scandinavia the bible is considered hat speech and it is soon to come to Canada. Nations are disarming their civillians and the UN is taking controll over the soverngty of Nations. The World Court threatens every nations right of law especially the USA, and there are talks of an International tax. There will be some kind of Global Civil War that will smash the current systems.......

[Mr. Mojo]

OK, I'm with you now. But you mentioned in your previous post that this global war will most likely take place around 20 years before any U.S. Civil War. I maintain that any global war against socialism would probably be concurrent with a U.S. Civil War, especially if socialism in our own nation keeps pace with that in the rest of the world.

[Mr. Mojo]

I'll probably do an article on the Aztlan website.

Ping me if you do. ...if you would.

[Porterville]

It depends, we may quickly remove any powers the socialist have if we decide to go to war against the socialist powers in Europe, but if we join up with the socialist then we are all screwed.

[F-117A]

bump!