Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX NEWS: ALABAMA TEN COMMANDMENTS JUDGE SUSPENDED...
Drudge Report ^ | 08/22/03 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 08/22/2003 2:40:17 PM PDT by Pokey78

Orlando Salinas broke in a few minutes ago and announced this on Fox News.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: falseidol; itsarock; publicproperty; roymoore; suspension; wackos; worshiptherock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 861-865 next last
To: sinkspur
That's a start, but not good enough. According to Webter's, emotions and prejudices are the operative points. Fair enough.

Question: Did Moore, when running for election, proclaim that he would erect this monument and get elected on that issue alone? Or, was he elected BECAUSE HE IS A CONSERVATIVE in general? A Conservative (admittedly a *really right-wing* one) might erect this monument, but there's a whole lot more that goes along with the package:

- opposing abortion, a social issue about which Conservatives care deeply

- supporting strict sentences for criminals

- opposing loose interpretations of the state's laws and Constitution

There are lots of other things that make one Conservative, but these apply specifically to the duties of a Chief Justice.

It's not enough to say that he is appealing to people's emotions *now*, since he is already in power (though if he was up for reelection, I might tend more toward your perspective).

Nor, is it enough to say that he is appealing to people's emotions in general. It depends on how he does it. So far, his arguments seem to center on the state's Constitution, which is at is core an intellectual argument. He's not saying "But it's God's law! It's blasphemous to shut the Lord out!" In that case I'd wonder how he's qualified to be a judge at all. However, so far all I've seen so far are lucid, intellectual arguments. The fact that this is an admittedly emotional issue for a lot of people is beside the point. There are countless issues that are important to different people and cause emotional reactions.

The second half of the definition mentioned prejudices. I haven't seen any specific examples of anything Moore has said or done that would qualify as playing on prejudices, so, since you have labelled him a demagogue, you have the onus of providing specific examples.
421 posted on 08/22/2003 5:22:16 PM PDT by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: tru
the making of a PoliceState

In the U.S.? Because of this legal/political battle over the statue of the 10 Commandments in Alabama?

No. I wouldn't worry about that quite yet.

5.56mm

422 posted on 08/22/2003 5:22:35 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

Comment #423 Removed by Moderator

To: Dog Gone
I will tell you one thing. This is one of the few things that gets me hopping mad about to actually want to go to Alabama (of course my violent comments are blowing off steam; I wouldn't actually do that, but I do need to shut the heck up anyway).

But, your comment about Thomas Jefferson led me to believe the objection was more than simply the defiance of a court order.
424 posted on 08/22/2003 5:26:54 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
Did Moore, when running for election, proclaim that he would erect this monument and get elected on that issue alone?

According to Alabama FReepers, the ONLY thing he ran on in 1998 was the attempt of courts to make him remove the 10 Commandments from his courtroom. The ONLY thing.

You could see this coming.

425 posted on 08/22/2003 5:33:18 PM PDT by sinkspur (Get two dogs and be part of a pack!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
We're under caution at the race right now. Can you point me to the comments you made about Jefferson? I read them, but I can't find them under a self-search.

Maybe that's because I'm trying to type during commercials, LOL.

426 posted on 08/22/2003 5:33:55 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Surely there is a Christian or Jewish owned printing company somewhere, interested in printing "Ten Commandments" on signs that would be suitable for people to stick in their front yards. Can you imagine the frustration of the ACLU and other Lib-loonies if the Ten Commandments turned up in millions of yards across America! We should do this to the glory of God......and in honor of Judge Moore.
427 posted on 08/22/2003 5:34:54 PM PDT by Winfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
According to Alabama FReepers, the ONLY thing he ran on in 1998 was the attempt of courts to make him remove the 10 Commandments from his courtroom. The ONLY thing.

Then he's an honest man who has stuck to his principles. Why does that annoy you so much?
428 posted on 08/22/2003 5:37:00 PM PDT by gsrinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Surely there is a Christian or Jewish owned printing company somewhere, interested in printing "Ten Commandments" on signs that would be suitable for people to stick in their front yards. Can you imagine the frustration of the ACLU and other Lib-loonies if the Ten Commandments turned up in millions of yards across America! We should do this to the glory of God......and in honor of Judge Moore.
429 posted on 08/22/2003 5:37:38 PM PDT by Winfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
According to Alabama FReepers, the ONLY thing he ran on in 1998 was the attempt of courts to make him remove the 10 Commandments from his courtroom. The ONLY thing.

And he got elected with over 70% of the vote so we know where Alabaman's stand.

We also know where the courts stand, high atop the mythical wall of separation lording it over the serfs below.

You're on the wrong side here sink, really wrong.

430 posted on 08/22/2003 5:39:17 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
If you can acknowledge my point, then you should be able to accept and understand why Moore lost twice and the monument has to go.
431 posted on 08/22/2003 5:40:18 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
You're doing yeoman's work in this.Keep it up :)
432 posted on 08/22/2003 5:41:39 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: gsrinok
sinkspur is all over these threads...maybe he is prejudiced against Christians. For all we know he could be glad about this and the recent sodomy ruling by SCOTUS
433 posted on 08/22/2003 5:42:38 PM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

-- The First Amendment


The right to freedom of religion is so central to American democracy that it was enshrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution along with other fundamental rights such as freedom of speech and freedom of the press.


In order to guarantee an atmosphere of absolute religious liberty, this country's founders also mandated the strict separation of church and state. Largely because of this prohibition against government regulation or endorsement of religion, diverse faiths have flourished and thrived in America since the founding of the republic. Indeed, James Madison, the father of the United States Constitution, once observed that "the [religious] devotion of the people has been manifestly increased by the total separation of the church from the state."

Americans are still among the most religious people in the world. Yet the government plays almost no role in promoting, endorsing or funding religious institutions or religious beliefs. Free from government control -- and without government assistance -- religious values, literature, traditions and holidays permeate the lives of our citizens and, in their diverse ways, form an integral part of our national culture. By maintaining the wall separating church and state, we can guarantee the continued vitality of religion in American life.
434 posted on 08/22/2003 5:44:02 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (a 'true conservative' would rather keep Davis than elect Arnold just so they can say 'I told you so')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I suspect that Alabama was a bad choice to fight this battle because the repercussions could be awesome.

And....

They've got their own WARSHIP with BIG GUNS!!!!

435 posted on 08/22/2003 5:44:55 PM PDT by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL
I wonder if these 8 judges are still using the Bible for people to be sworn in, so help them, God?

I'm sure they are, but it's just tradition. You can refuse to be sworn in on a Bible, or in the name of any sort of God, and they will accommodate you, by having you affirm your testimony instead.

I agree this makes them look like hypocrites; I'm just pointing out that putting your hand on a Christian Bible and swearing to God is not a requirement to testify in any American court.

436 posted on 08/22/2003 5:45:53 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: tutstar
Actually, I was thinking that Sink was one of the molls that reports everything he reads here back to the DU message board. It's not like we haven't seen plenty of those guys here in the past. I've never paid a lot of attention to him before, but his postings in this thread would indicate that he's a lot closer to the lib/dim philosophy than he is to the predominantly conservative philosophy of most Freepers.
437 posted on 08/22/2003 5:46:15 PM PDT by gsrinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"There's a lot of truth in what you said here."

Too bad no one else is listening. I can't wait to see the U.N. edict on "The Passion" next year.
438 posted on 08/22/2003 5:47:12 PM PDT by Beck_isright (Shenandoah and Blue Ridge will re-emerge as the investment of the 21st Century....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Thank you for your post, I didn't know what Manzanar was, so I had to look it up. I learned something today, and your comment is right on track.
439 posted on 08/22/2003 5:49:21 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (a 'true conservative' would rather keep Davis than elect Arnold just so they can say 'I told you so')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: tutstar
sinkspur is all over these threads...maybe he is prejudiced against Christians. For all we know he could be glad about this and the recent sodomy ruling by SCOTUS

Yay! Vague hypothesizing is always more fun than coherent argument.

440 posted on 08/22/2003 5:50:09 PM PDT by SedVictaCatoni (What do you think an 'establishment of religion' would look like, if not this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 861-865 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson