Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq's terrorists have friends in high places
The Daily Telegraph ^ | 8/21/03 | Michael Ledeen

Posted on 08/22/2003 5:49:32 AM PDT by truthandlife

Iraq's terrorists have friends in high places

Michael Ledeen The Daily Telegraph

Thursday, August 21, 2003 ADVERTISEMENT

Long before the launch of Operation Iraqi Freedom, I wrote that the coalition had better be ready for a relentless terrorist assault, in both Afghanistan and Iraq, once Saddam had been toppled.

We had waited an unconscionably long time between the liberation of Afghanistan and the move against Saddam, thereby giving the terror masters in Baghdad, Tehran, Damascus and Riyadh abundant opportunity to plan their response. They decided to repeat what they saw as their winning strategy in Lebanon in the 1980s (driving out the United States and France) and 1990s (compelling an Israeli withdrawal from the south).

Iranian and Syrian leaders made no secret of their intent, and Bashar Assad even gave an interview in which he brazenly informed us -- and potential recruits to the jihad -- that the terror masters would use religiously inspired insurrection, assassination and terrorism, first to bloody and then to humiliate the West, and anyone who joined us.

Just a few days ago, Paul Bremer -- the de facto governor of Iraq -- complained at the large number of foreign terrorists flowing into the country, and he specifically labelled Iran as a prime mover. He announced that intelligence officers from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard were actively organizing terrorist operations.

Tuesday's Financial Times carried a front-page story warning that thousands of Saudis were headed to Iraq to attack U.S. and British targets.

Now perhaps more people will understand that the jihad in Iraq and Afghanistan is not limited to the citizens of one or two countries, but is waged against anyone who tries to make Iraq a free and successful country. The terror masters know that they would not survive successful democratic revolution on their doorsteps, because their own people would demand their freedom.

The facts have been available for a long time, and no one should be surprised at the truck bomb attack on the UN's offices in Baghdad on Tuesday, which claimed the life of the UN special representative to Iraq, Sergio Vieira de Mello.

But, as human nature contains an unlimited quantum of hope despite millennia of intensely unpleasant experience, many will resist drawing the obvious conclusions and, even more, be reluctant to take appropriate action.

The jihad in Iraq is simply a continuation of the terror war against the West that saw its most recent apogee on Sept. 11, 2001. That war has been on for more than a quarter-century, and the terror masters will continue to wage it until they have won or lost.

This terror war is currently centred in the Middle East (although battles are also waged in South Asia), where we are engaged in a regional conflict with Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia. Until the regimes of those countries surrender or are removed, we will be attacked, both in the Middle East and in our own countries.

And we cannot buy our way out of this war by changing our policies on such questions as Palestine and Israel, or on the presence of armed forces on Saudi soil, or by going easy on the weapons of mass destruction programs of Syria and Iran.

Indeed, those who see peace between Israel and Palestine as the most urgent issue in the region should be the most vigorous in supporting democratic revolution in Syria and Iran, since it is clear that a good deal of Palestinian terrorism has been organized by the mullahcracy in Tehran, and the terrorists have trained in Syrian-occupied Lebanon.

Other lingering misconceptions about the nature of the terror network have got in the way of clear understanding and hence of effective policy. The U.S. Secretary of State, Colin Powell, and his British counterpart, Jack Straw, often speak as if they believe we could actually enlist Syria, Saudi Arabia and Iran in the war against terror, which is rather like Roosevelt convincing himself that he could enlist Hitler and Mussolini in a war against Japan following Pearl Harbor.

That such serious and distinguished people have embraced a delusion of such magnitude testifies both to the cunning of the terror masters and the painful obligations that the truth imposes on the free societies of the world.

It would be nice to settle things at the negotiating table, and we are inclined to talk and talk, and walk last mile after last mile, to avoid the unpleasant reality that we are indeed at war.

Perhaps the bombing of the UN offices will clarify things, and spur the feckless critics of the war against terrorism to join us. The terror masters do not think that will happen. They expect that the flow of body bags will stimulate world public opinion to demand an end to the "occupation" of Iraq -- which would transform Iraq and Afghanistan from humiliating defeats for the Islamists into glorious triumphs over the West.

The terror masters would then have demonstrated one of their central theses: that the crusaders and infidels of the West have no stomach for real fighting, and lack the tenacity and determination to prevail in this war.

That would be a catastrophe, especially because our victories against the Taliban and Saddam have threatened the terror regimes as never before. Particularly in Iran -- the most powerful engine of the terror network -- the overwhelming majority of the people desperately wish to be free, and passionately want to join the ranks of civilized countries.

Modest support of the Iranian people would probably bring the downfall of the mullahs, thereby removing the linchpin of the terrorist edifice. Without Iran, the Syrians would be unable to sustain the murderous activities of groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and both the Baathist regime in Damascus and the terrorists it has been supporting would be easy prey for their enemies.

The terror masters are wounded and frightened, but they are still on the battlefield and they are determined to prevail. They understand, correctly in my opinion, that it is all a matter of will. We have more than enough power to prevail, but we have yet to demonstrate the resolve to impose victory on our enemies.


TOPICS: Editorial; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrineunfold; iraq; michaelledeen; warlist

1 posted on 08/22/2003 5:49:32 AM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
BTTT
2 posted on 08/22/2003 6:02:29 AM PDT by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
"it is all a matter of will"

The Left, of which the media is a part, is trying its best to destroy that will. Apparently they are doing this merely because they think a failure for Bush could help get a Democrat into power.

The whole thing makes one despair for our species.

3 posted on 08/22/2003 6:40:52 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
The U.S. Secretary of State, Colin Powell, and his British counterpart, Jack Straw, often speak as if they believe we could actually enlist Syria, Saudi Arabia and Iran in the war against terror, which is rather like Roosevelt convincing himself that he could enlist Hitler and Mussolini in a war against Japan following Pearl Harbor.

Excellent article. And the above is a particularly important point. It's time to get realistic about these countries.

4 posted on 08/22/2003 6:48:09 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
bump
5 posted on 08/22/2003 7:53:35 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (We should have prioritized **NORTH KOREA**, not IRAQ. Can you spell 'mission creep'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; *war_list; W.O.T.; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; blam; Sabertooth; ...
Thanks for posting this excellent article!

Bush Doctrine Unfolds :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below:
  click here >>> Bush Doctrine Unfold <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



6 posted on 08/22/2003 9:21:47 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
We may end up with a military 'draft' over the war with Islam before this is complete.
7 posted on 08/22/2003 9:42:49 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
Not yet, that would help the leftists!
8 posted on 08/22/2003 9:56:15 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Iraq's terrorists have friends in high places

When I first saw the headline, I thought it was referring to the Democrats in the US Congress.

9 posted on 08/22/2003 10:05:57 AM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
I thought it was referring to the Democrats in the US Congress.

What you say is true also!

10 posted on 08/22/2003 10:10:06 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
This is a very sobering article!
11 posted on 08/22/2003 10:11:38 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Good article. Thanks Ernest.
12 posted on 08/22/2003 7:15:51 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (And you would find we gonna fly away, plan to go my way, I love it when we're cruising together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Iranian and Syrian leaders made no secret of their intent, and Bashar Assad even gave an interview in which he brazenly informed us -- and potential recruits to the jihad -- that the terror masters would use religiously inspired insurrection, assassination and terrorism, first to bloody and then to humiliate the West, and anyone who joined us.

Speaking of Assad, I suspect he may already have a meeting scheduled with the U.S. Army, but doesn't know it yet.

As for the terrorist attacks on our troops in Iraq, I hate them, but it's better that we fight the terrorists in the streets of Baghdad than in the streets of Washington, D.C.

13 posted on 08/23/2003 12:49:54 AM PDT by Imal (The World According to Imal: http://imal.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal
As for the terrorist attacks on our troops in Iraq, I hate them, but it's better that we fight the terrorists in the streets of Baghdad than in the streets of Washington, D.C.

That would be prudent to say the least. The terrorists however don't want to fight us anywhere, their turf or ours, they just want to kill us! Their goal, as I see it, would be to be here in the US and kill if they could. Their mindset is NOT to strike a war for that would be deterimental to their goals.

They want to kill not fight!

It definitely creates a new mindset as to how we defend our way of life IMHO.

14 posted on 08/23/2003 1:09:21 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
bump
15 posted on 08/23/2003 5:54:17 AM PDT by visualops (If you like the 7th century so much- give up your cell phones and satellites and live in a tent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
The U.S. Secretary of State, Colin Powell, and his British counterpart, Jack Straw, often speak as if they believe we could actually enlist Syria, Saudi Arabia and Iran in the war against terror, which is rather like Roosevelt convincing himself that he could enlist Hitler and Mussolini in a war against Japan following Pearl Harbor.

That line jumped out at me as well. Worth saying again and again and again.

16 posted on 08/23/2003 7:00:21 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
The Left, of which the media is a part, is trying its best to destroy that will. Apparently they are doing this merely because they think a failure for Bush could help get a Democrat into power. The whole thing makes one despair for our species.

I fear for our country and our way of life. Troops will tell you that the rant of the left is demoralizing. The rant of the media will help the downfall of America if more of us do not speak up and support our President.

All of the conservatives who say they will not support W will aid in that downfall. I do not support 100% of what W has done, or anyone else, for that matter.

Can anyone name a politician that they agree with 100% of the time, all the time?

17 posted on 08/23/2003 9:45:23 AM PDT by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson