Skip to comments.
Bush Re-elect Numbers Worsen; 43%-43% Bush vs. any Democratic Contender (Zogby Dem. Puke Poll)
Zogby ^
| 8/21/03
Posted on 08/21/2003 6:40:53 AM PDT by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: areafiftyone
Geezzz! I wonder why? It couldn't be all the bad press, could it? (sarcasm)
2
posted on
08/21/2003 6:44:22 AM PDT
by
shiva
To: areafiftyone
Glad to see the liberal media whores are performing their propaganda job so well -- get DNC talking points, parrot same.
3
posted on
08/21/2003 6:44:47 AM PDT
by
CedarDave
(The Dems look for a shadow on the brightest day, call it the dark of night and blame George W. Bush)
To: areafiftyone
All the Republicans need to stop all the in-fighting and back-stabbing and concentrate on getting GWB re-elected - and I ain't just whistlin' dixie.
4
posted on
08/21/2003 6:45:58 AM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: areafiftyone
Maybe I've been under a rock, but I don't think I've seen a poll like this before. "Who would you pick, George W. Bush, or someone else?" I imagine it's easy to get a fairly high "someone" number. But if you get specific, won't it be 11% for Kerry, 12% for Dean, 3% for Sharpton -- and 48% for Bush?
I recall asking friends who were graduating college what kind of job they wanted.
"Oh, I'll take anything. Anything at all."
"Well, would you scoop ice cream?"
"Hell no!"
In the abstract, people are open to "someone else" but when it comes to particulars, it's a different story.
5
posted on
08/21/2003 6:46:23 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(France delenda est)
To: CedarDave

Wait a minute, guys.
Did any of you read this?
The Zogby America poll involved 1,011 likely voters selected randomly from throughout the 48 contiguous states using listed residential telephone numbers.
Would any one of you like to have seen the questions on the poll? How the hell does "random selection" lead to an accurate result?
Damn push poll is what this is.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
6
posted on
08/21/2003 6:50:12 AM PDT
by
section9
(To see my blog, click on the Major!)
To: ClearCase_guy
This poll would be the high water mark for the rats because it allows each rat to vote for his ideal rat candidate.
THat said, I find it interesting that Bush's poll numbers for August dates are consistant. I see a possible seasonal effect here.
7
posted on
08/21/2003 6:50:23 AM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: areafiftyone
Relax. Come November 2004 we will see a landslide of Reaganesque proportions.
Reagan's numbers were not so good at the same point in his first term. Then came November 1984.
8
posted on
08/21/2003 6:50:47 AM PDT
by
Skooz
(Tagline removed by moderator)
To: areafiftyone
Q: "Do you feel safer with George Bush as President, or with Democrat candidate ___________."
Next question.
GWB will get our support, will win the election, will continue the fight. I recommend we focus our additional energies on expanding the margin in the Senate.
9
posted on
08/21/2003 6:50:51 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(BULLDOZE AL AQSA!)
To: areafiftyone
I used to be asked regularly to vote in Zogby's Online poll. I haven't been sent one in quite a while. Do you suppose I was weeded out because I *always* give President Bush the highest marks?
10
posted on
08/21/2003 6:51:19 AM PDT
by
Ditter
To: areafiftyone
Zogby laying on the special sauce, that accurately predicted a Democratic landslide in 2002 (sarcasm on)
To: section9
Random polling is required for it to be valid.
12
posted on
08/21/2003 6:52:30 AM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: Brad Cloven
Q: "Do you feel safer with George Bush as President, or with Democrat candidate Wesley Clark."
Not saying I'd support him personally, but I think a lot of people would vote yes to that question once the campaign season starts bubbling. Just a thought.
To: areafiftyone
All this says to me is....
GAME ON!
14
posted on
08/21/2003 6:54:24 AM PDT
by
j_k_l
To: El Che Vive
Uh. It isn't a "yes/no" question.
But maybe you're right.
15
posted on
08/21/2003 6:56:21 AM PDT
by
Skooz
(Tagline removed by moderator)
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: areafiftyone
Didn't the Zogby poll said that Jeb was going to lose to McBride?
17
posted on
08/21/2003 7:02:00 AM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: BattleRoyale

Possibly. However, I would suspect that statistical accuracy would have been increased had Zogby done the same poll several times. Now perhaps he did.
If this is accurate, we'll be in for a rough patch until the economy improves demonstrably. However, Zogby's record in 2002 was nothing to write home about.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
18
posted on
08/21/2003 7:03:01 AM PDT
by
section9
(To see my blog, click on the Major!)
To: areafiftyone
Is the pollster a member of the peaceful religion?
To: mabelkitty
He sure is. Heard the peaceful religion is being targed by the Dems as a major voting block. Interesting how they know what group is the most gullible!
20
posted on
08/21/2003 7:08:48 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(The U.N. needs a good Flush!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson