MUST READ! Communist Goals (1963)

Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 ^ | January 10, 1963 | HON. A. S. HERLONG

[Capitalism2003]

kerry is definately their man

[Samwise]

BUMP

[weegee]

Snopes is biased left but thanks anyway. They excuse their deceits by saying that it all comes down to the framing question.

The Snopes article makes reference to later versions but does not include this one, nor does it mention the reference to the book, "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen.

[Barset]

Thanks for posting this.

The one constant of the collectivist Left --- they never rest.

[MeekOneGOP]

MUST READ! Communist Goals (1963)

Excerpt:

Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:

[From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]

CURRENT COMMUNIST GOALS

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

---

Fast forward to today.

Scary stuff, folks, imho ...

Exposed: Pelosi's Socialist Ties

Pelosi leader of 'Progressive Caucus'

Click here or on the pic to hear
the Socialist Pelosi Pig squeal !

From those links, these excerpts ...

"DSA/USA, the 'Democratic Socialists of America' are the U.S. arm of the Socialist International. They share the symbol of the fist holding the rose, and they share the tasks to be accomplished — in our case, an altogether different America ...

"Some time ago — the date is missing from the descriptions — 58 members of the U.S. House of Representatives formed a subdivision of the Democratic Socialists of America and called it the Progressive Caucus. Their statement of purpose, as well as their membership list, formed an integral part of the dsausa Web site (www.dsausa.org ). The membership list appeared on the screen with the continuous background of the fist holding the rose, should anyone have missed the connection with the Socialist International."

Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., the likely [she is now] new minority leader in the House of Representatives, serves on the executive committee of the socialist-leaning Progressive Caucus, a bloc of about 60 votes or nearly 30 percent of the minority vote in the lower chamber.

The Democratic Socialists of America's chief organizing goal is to work within the Democratic Party and remove the stigma attached to "socialism" in the eyes of most Americans.

"Stress our Democratic Party strategy and electoral work," explains an organizing document of the DSA. "The Democratic Party is something the public understands, and association with it takes the edge off. Stressing our Democratic Party work will establish some distance from the radical subculture and help integrate you to the milieu of the young liberals."

Progressive Caucus

---

[rightinthemiddle]

Has anyone noticed that the first time someone sees this information, they feel like they have to tell the world?

I know I did.

E-mail it to people you know...they're amazed.

[Happy2BMe]

Good post on #25 - Communist Goals (1963)

Those goals haven't (and won't) change. The Democratic Party of America is right in step - ping.

[MeekOneGOP]

Strange. He signed up 16 months ago and that is his first and ONLY post here on FR.

[MeekOneGOP]

[Your Nightmare]

These are taken from The Naked Communist by W. Cleon Skousen, but they are Skousen's opinion of what the "Communist's Goals" were in the early 60s. They weren't developed and published by any communist.

Know what they are and take them for what they are worth to you.

PS. You can search the book on Amazon and look at the pages this list is on.

[Qwinn]

Although it was entered into the congressional record in 1963, I believe Skousen wrote the book in 1958. That can make a significant difference in terms of impressing upon people how unlikely so many of these "predictions" were in coming true. What someone could claim could have been seen as a natural progression of current trends in '63 is a fair amount less credible when you realize he made those predictions in the far less rebellious '50s.

Qwinn

[Qwinn]

It wasn't so much simply "opinion" as it was the result of his extensive research on the subject and of communist writings. You make a valid point that the list shouldn't be considered as authored by a communist, but at the same time it's not fair to categorize it as just guesswork on his part either.

Qwinn

[Your Nightmare]

True, but people were acting as if this list were written by Stalin. I just wanted to make sure people understood what it was.

[lodwick]

As Nikita told us, we will rot from within, and take ourselves down.

Great post - thanks.

[Qwinn]

As I said, you did raise a valid point.

However, the unlikelihood that the vast majority of what you initially implied were unsupported "opinions" would turn out to have a predictive hit-rate that would make Nostradamus green with envy leads me to believe that A) communists have indeed heavily influenced our culture, and B) Skouzer was right on about their plans. The notion that he was significantly wrong about them, but significantly wrong in precisely such a way as to almost exactly mimic the current Democrat Party platform of 50 years later, is a bit too improbable IMHO to take seriously.

Qwinn

[weegee]

It would be interesting to see a boxed set of episodes of "I Led Three Lives" about the double agent (US working for the KGB in America) released in the current political atmosphere.

People would wake up to just who the ACLU, MoveOn.org, and other serve.

They are Stalin's useful idiots and he's laughing from the grave.

[B4Ranch]

The scariest part is when you pause to think who has been in charge with 'the majority' of the past 30 years.

[OESY]

Some supplemental observations about liberal behavior:



Play class, race, gender and political issues to divide citizens of the targeted society.

Breakdown traditional ties to community, religion and family to facilitate teaching your agenda.

Render education systems ineffective by reducing standards, discipline and independent thinking.

Define social deviancy downward while promoting moral relativism and blaming ills on society.

Stress emotion over facts in order to sway masses of people to adopt your agenda/dogma.


Downgrade social judgmentalism by de-emphasizing the teaching of historical context.

Pass laws that can be selectively administered with media assistance to favor friendly groups.

Use news and entertainment media to carefully identify and condemn targeted groups/ideas.

Restrict diversity of opinion to avoid undercutting your message, and condemn rival sources.

Use news and entertainment media to attack and ridicule respected institutions in society.


Harness media to emasculate military, police, and other forms of authority or power.

Attack business corporations in the courts and bleed them dry to fund your operations.

Obtain public funding wherever possible to support your causes and ideological adherents.

Use discrimination to favor (hire, promote) groups friendly to your agenda and party dogma.

Outlaw or bankrupt competing centers of information or authority not supportive of your agenda.


Infiltrate rival groups so as to subvert their goals while building a base to assume leadership.

Recognize with honors and awards only those opinion leaders who support your agenda.

Utilize executive orders, regulatory fiats and court orders/trials to implement your agenda.

Carve out exceptions in common law, tax law and general regulations to aid your kind.

Employ networks of adherents to put maximum peer pressure on dissidents to conform.

[KoRn]

Geez. They have accomplished quite a few of those goals. We gotta stay on watch because with a little more time and progress they could be on the verge of court mandated victory. It may already be too late.