MUST READ! Communist Goals (1963)

Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 ^ | January 10, 1963 | HON. A. S. HERLONG

[rdcorso]

So are you saying that because so many of his predictions have come to pass that it can't possibly be true?The fact that John Kerry almost won the election tells me the communist have succeeded beyond their wildest imaginations.What bothers me is the last election where the democrats ran a left-wing communist repackaged as a patriotic war hero and he received 49% of the votes.If the 2004 election were held back in the 50s and early 60s a candidate like Kerry would have received maybe 10% of the votes.We might not be up against the same old enemy but there are still groups out there working for the destruction of the US as we know it.

[Qwinn]

"So are you saying that because so many of his predictions have come to pass that it can't possibly be true?"

No, I was saying quite the opposite. I find the accuracy of his predictions to be so accurate that I can't fathom any plausible explanation other than that he was right about the Communist plan, and they have been highly successful in enacting it. That society would've just naturally progressed to the point he claimed Communists wanted in the '50's (and my readings of Gramsci, etc., also confirm that he wasn't just making it up) isn't remotely credible. Society had to have been deliberately engineered to achieve the results as listed so presciently by Skouser. No way such a precise progression just happened by accident.

Qwinn

[W. W. SMITH]

The terms Communist, Progressive and Liberal as used by the left, all mean the same thing. Let me explain why. Carl Marx in 1848 finished writing and then published the Communist Manifesto. Over the next 30 to 40 years the book gained some followers, mostly self anointed elites with PHDs. ( Now there is a subject worth some grant money. Why are highly educated people with PHDs so susceptible to such an absurd philosophy.) As people became aware of their agenda, the communists picked the term progressive in an attempt to hide that agenda. Years later, the same problem, to many people have spotted the agenda again so they picked the term liberal. ( Note that the dictionary definitions of progressive and liberal are very far removed from the political definitions.)

One of the goals of their agenda is to infiltrate and take control of both major political parties. The Democrat party is at this time wholly controlled, 90% to 95%. The Republican party is 40% to 45% controlled. This leaves WE THE PEOPLE with very little true representation inside the belt way.

If we want to survive, as a nation, as a republic, we must flush the progressives from both parties, from all government offices, from the media, from positions of instruction, both public schools and universities. The progressive political philosophy must be rendered ineffectual, laughable, an object of ridicule. The progressive must be excoriated and driven out of any position of authority. Any adherent of such an absurd idea should never be paid more than minimum wage.

In a brief spasm of vigilantism, shooting or hanging fifteen too twenty thousand progressives would end their agenda for at least two hundred years.

[MindBender26]

Sffr