Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge threatens to delay election
San Jose Mercury News ^ | Sat, Aug. 16, | Edwin Garcia

Posted on 08/16/2003 7:02:32 AM PDT by tdadams

A San Jose federal judge late Friday threatened to halt California's first-ever gubernatorial recall vote unless the federal government can ensure that minority voters won't be left out of the political process.

U.S. District Court Judge Jeremy Fogel issued a temporary restraining order preventing Monterey County from proceeding with its preparations because its election plan has not been reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice, a requirement for certain counties where the voting rights of minorities have been violated in the past. The statewide election could not proceed unless voters in all counties can participate. [snipped]

Specifically, Fogel barred the county from mailing absentee ballots to overseas voters, the next step in its preparations.

But civil rights attorneys, who have said the speedy election violates the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and have sought to postpone the election to the March presidential primary, praised the judge's order.

(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnold; california; davis; democrats; greydavis; huffington; injunction; recall; republicans; shwarzenegger; specialelection; zeroapprovalrating
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: cyncooper
Uh, you don't know what I would propose to change it, do you????

Do you?

41 posted on 08/16/2003 3:04:11 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
I certainly do. But it hardly matters. I don't even live there. And you seem to think if Buffet says jump Arnold will say how high.

We'll see.
42 posted on 08/16/2003 3:05:52 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I certainly do.

Whine?

43 posted on 08/16/2003 3:08:47 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Schultz has been named to "co" an Economic Recovery Council.

As has Buffett. Schultz and Buffett are co-chairs.

44 posted on 08/16/2003 3:11:09 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
The only way to amend it is with another proposition properly placed on the ballot and passed.
45 posted on 08/16/2003 3:11:12 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
As I understand it, the submission for approval from the US Justice Department concerns the four counties, but has ALREADY BEEN REQUESTED FOR THEM BY STATE OFFICIALS. The only step left to be performed is the Justice approval. You can bet your bottom dollar that Ashcroft will make certain that occurs -- and at that point, even the Clinton-appointed judge will have to dismiss the cases, in line with his own prior decision.

Game, set and match.

Billybob

46 posted on 08/16/2003 3:12:36 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob ("Don't just stand there. Run for Congress." www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
That's nice.

Then what is all the uproar over since Schwarzenegger is not going to be able to single handedly, upon the orders of Buffett, (lol), instantly change it?

47 posted on 08/16/2003 3:19:34 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Schultz and Buffett are co-chairs.

Of a council.

Who is Arnold's "senior financial and economic adviser"?

48 posted on 08/16/2003 3:20:21 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Mello-Roos.
49 posted on 08/16/2003 3:21:49 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
All they have to do is say we have ballots, places and opportunity for everyone.
So no delay and it's time to vote.
50 posted on 08/16/2003 3:26:10 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
It was the second major announcement in two days for the actor. On Wednesday, the campaign said billionaire investor Warren Buffett would be a financial adviser.

Buffett and Shultz will be joint co-chairs of the economic council. The appointments of Buffett, a Democrat, and Republican Shultz reflect the campaign's attempt to assemble a diverse and bipartisan team.

I cannot find a written report anywhere that Buffett is the SOLE "senior financial and economic advisor."

If you have proof somewhere, I'd like to see it.

Nor have I seen anywhere that Buffett's position is for a possible administration, and not just for the campaign.

So far, all I'm seeing is the media fixating on the names most likely to piss off Republicans.

SOP media BS.

51 posted on 08/16/2003 3:28:57 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
"LOS ANGELES (AP) -- Arnold Schwarzenegger has named Warren Buffett as his senior financial and economic adviser in his bid to replace Gray Davis, the Republican's campaign announced Wednesday."

http://news.lycos.com/news/story.asp?section=Elections&storyId=772821
52 posted on 08/16/2003 3:45:38 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: novacation
What about all of the illegals who have been voting all along. People working in the Dept. of motor vehicles were told 10 years ago to ignore phony identification cards carried by illegals. Time to show birth certificates plus citizenship papers at the voting booths.
53 posted on 08/16/2003 4:47:08 PM PDT by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe; redlipstick
Whatever he is, Buffett can advise until the cows come home. The only thing that matters is what position Schwarzenegger takes.

Why is this getting so little notice?

Arnold nixes Buffett advice over Prop. 13

Excerpt:

Mr. Buffett doesn't speak for Mr. Schwarzenegger," said Rob Stutzman, spokesman for Schwarzenegger's campaign. "Arnold Schwarzenegger has supported Prop. 13 for 25 years. ... Arnold is an admirer of Howard Jarvis and has referred to him as the original tax terminator." Jarvis and Paul Gann were the prime movers behind Prop. 13, the tax-slashing initiative approved overwhelmingly in 1978.

Thank goodness that thread was in Latest Posts when I just signed back on. I guess it is getting pretty much ignored in favor of Schwarzenegger bashing.

54 posted on 08/16/2003 6:37:55 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
said Rob Stutzman

What does Arnold say? In retaining Buffett after the attack on Proposition 13, Arnolds actions speak even louder than his silence.

55 posted on 08/16/2003 6:40:46 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Mr. Buffett doesn't speak for Mr. Schwarzenegger," said Rob Stutzman, spokesman for Schwarzenegger's campaign. "

Stutzman speaks for Schwarzenegger, Roscoe. Get it?

56 posted on 08/16/2003 6:51:04 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
In fact, that link I provided goes on:

Ironically, it was in June that Schwarzenegger was the keynote speaker at a 25th anniversary celebration of Prop. 13. Schwarzenegger praised the measure, which sharply curtails yearly increases in property taxes.

"Arnold gave a wonderful talk on Proposition 13, and his own life," said Jon Coupal, president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. "He has never made any comments in the past that worry us about his stance on Prop. 13."

So much for your false accusation of "silence".

57 posted on 08/16/2003 6:53:41 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Arnold commented at a dinner last June on the attacks that Warren Buffett, senior financial and economic adviser, made on Proposition 13 this week? That's a pretty delusional assertion.

Buffett has NOT been removed and I see NO statements regarding his actions from Arnold.

58 posted on 08/16/2003 7:01:21 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Stutzman speaks for Schwarzenegger

Is Stutzman on the ballot?

59 posted on 08/16/2003 7:04:26 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
LOL

As I pointed out earlier. A topic can be put on the table and opinions expressed. It does not mean that is the position of the candidate.

You just refuse to acknowledge that maybe Schwarzenegger isn't dancing to Buffett's tune.

Too bad. I deal with reality and it ain't the way you say it is.
60 posted on 08/16/2003 7:10:38 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson