Skip to comments.
Nearly 8,000 doctors call for national health insurance
Associated Press ^
| Tuesday, August 12, 2003
| AP
Posted on 08/12/2003 7:45:32 PM PDT by FreeLibertarian
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:02:57 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Nearly 8,000 U.S. physicians are calling for government-financed national health insurance, which they say would cover every American while saving billions of dollars.
Ten years after President Clinton's national health plan died in Congress, tangled in complexity and under fierce assault from the medical, insurance and pharmaceutical industries, the doctors argue that private sector solutions have failed.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghancaves; doctors; health; insurance; socializedmedicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
We may be in trouble.
To: FreeLibertarian
Anyone interested in national health care should visit Canada...and get sick or injured.
2
posted on
08/12/2003 7:47:32 PM PDT
by
CWOJackson
(The World According to Garp isn't that bad when compared with The World According to Todd.)
To: FreeLibertarian
I heard this discussed on the radio tonight and was amazed. The government would do this and the government would do that...but of course where does the money come from to pay all of this?? I know.....taxes!!
3
posted on
08/12/2003 7:47:44 PM PDT
by
Mfkmmof4
To: FreeLibertarian
Ship them all to France, Canada and Cuba. The hell with all of them.
4
posted on
08/12/2003 7:47:48 PM PDT
by
Beck_isright
(Shenandoah and Blue Ridge will re-emerge as the investment of the 21st Century....)
To: FreeLibertarian
I can save even more on administration cost... No insurance at all, no more than $20 a visit to the doctor, and hospital stays at less than $50 a day.
5
posted on
08/12/2003 7:48:47 PM PDT
by
irishtenor
(I AM in shape, round is a shape, ya know.)
To: FreeLibertarian
Nearly 8,000 doctors call for national health insurance,
Don't you mean 8,000 'useful idiots' call for national health insurance.
To: FreeLibertarian
I'll bet money, marbles and chalk you don't have to dig very deep to find the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation involved in this.
7
posted on
08/12/2003 7:51:13 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: FreeLibertarian
How many insurance salesmen want this?
8
posted on
08/12/2003 7:51:29 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: CWOJackson
The Canadians have not secured rights to a new drug in over 40 years.
Any opinions on that miserable record?
9
posted on
08/12/2003 7:52:12 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: Paul C. Jesup
Look, what we have here is an average if 160 doctors per state. Hell, there are that many doctors in one large hospital in San Diego.
10
posted on
08/12/2003 7:53:44 PM PDT
by
gaspar
To: jwalsh07
My in-law winter in Mesa, Arizona. They used to have Canadian neighbors until the husband had a heart attack. The Canadian medical system basically insisted that the American hospital treating him get him stable enough to fly back to Canada on a normal passenger flight. He died several hours after getting back to Canada.
11
posted on
08/12/2003 7:55:12 PM PDT
by
CWOJackson
(The World According to Garp isn't that bad when compared with The World According to Todd.)
To: FreeLibertarian
These idiot doctors think that once the government is paying for their procedures, their work schedules and fee schedules will remain at their own convenience. They don't forsee what will surely happen: longer hours, less patient selection discretion and lower reimbursements.
To: FreeLibertarian
That 8,000 number will shrink to about 0 when they realize that the cost reductions in any government-paid system of medical care are primarily the result of government-imposed limits on doctors' fees.
To: FreeLibertarian
You should hear my uncle rattle off about this issue. He is a big shot physician in Illinois. With full confidence he tells us that government run health care is "inevitable."
14
posted on
08/12/2003 7:57:42 PM PDT
by
Stew Padasso
(pro-rock.com - bsnn.net - libertyteeth.com - BFD - Puff Puff Ping)
To: CWOJackson
I'll bet the Canadian relatives blamed the U.S. for not flying him back quick enough.
To: gaspar
No kidding. I have at least a dozen friends who are MDs. This article means nada.
16
posted on
08/12/2003 7:58:26 PM PDT
by
annyokie
To: Stew Padasso; FreeLibertarian
You're right, it probably is inevitable, and we're in trouble. The sickening irony is that it may come about during a Republican administration. A year ago, would you have believed even a RINO would go for the Prescription program?
17
posted on
08/12/2003 8:02:18 PM PDT
by
jammer
To: FreeLibertarian
Nearly 8,000 U.S. physicians are calling for government-financed national health insurance, which they say would cover every American while saving billions of dollars. - Are these 8,000 doctors willing to become Federal salaried employees?
- Are the trial lawyers willing to forego malpractice suits since you cannot sue the federal government?
- Is the American public willing to accept rationed care when it comes to themselves or a loved one?
- Is the American public willing to accept quality of life judgments made by a committee or a bureaucrat when it comes to themselves or a loved one?
If the answers are all yes then we might save money even though health care in America would be all the worse.
18
posted on
08/12/2003 8:02:22 PM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Save Traditional Marriage -- It's for the Children!)
To: FreeLibertarian
The AP citing a story that 8,000 Doctors support this or that without saying what the total number of practicing Doctors there are out there in the US is meaningless.
In fact it could be potentially said that the AP may be obscuring the truth to push an AP Political Agenda.
For the 8,000 number to be signicificant it would have to represent more that 15% of the total number of Doctors and have come from a totally random sampling. Additionally, the questions would have to have been so constructed and restated in the survey in such a manner so as to eliminate confusion over the questions respondants being able to predetermine the overall outcome. (In otherwords not to FREEP the survey!)
This is all specified in the study and standard practice of Statistics and Ergonomics as they apply to statistics.
Me personnaly, I think the AP is lying and pushing an agenda from the political left.
19
posted on
08/12/2003 8:03:43 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: jammer
No. I never thought I would see the day.
20
posted on
08/12/2003 8:04:35 PM PDT
by
FreeLibertarian
(You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson