Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PETE WILSON ENDORSES ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER
Hugh Hewitt Show

Posted on 08/11/2003 3:10:35 PM PDT by Cinnamon Girl

Former Governor Pete Wilson is on the Hugh Hewitt show now and has just said that he will support Arnold in the election.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; eaglelooksright; endorsement; future; governator; hastalavistababy; hughhewitt; killerzap; mcclinton; mcloser; mcmarginalized; petewilson; schwarzenegger; terminadem; thunderstorm; tomwho; totalrecall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: Cinnamon Girl
It doesn't surprise me. Pete Wilson is Arnold's campaign manager.
21 posted on 08/11/2003 3:34:41 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
See also:
Total California Recall
[David Horowitz: Arnold is "the only possibility of a win for state GOP"]

FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | August 11, 2003 | David Horowitz
Posted on 08/11/2003 9:16 AM PDT by RonDog

Total California Recall
By David Horowitz
FrontPageMagazine.com | August 11, 2003

From the outset the California recall was a bad idea for Republicans. It was a lose, lose, lose situation. Without the recall Republicans would have contended for an open seat in 2006 against a non-incumbent Democrat running on a crippled legacy. The recall introduced three basic possibilities into this mix, all of them bad.

The first of these would be a defeat of the recall and hence a win for the Democrats. The second would be a victory for the recall but the election of a Democrat to replace Davis, forcing Republicans to face an incumbent in 2006. The third would be a victory for the recall and a Republican governor. Ironically, this would have created the possibility for the worst scenario of all.

The victory of a Republican would have meant a conservative governor with a plurality of 20 percent. Even this would probably be optimistic since Republicans notoriously lack discipline, guaranteeing a full Republican field. Thus a conservative victory would set up a conservative disaster.

If Issa, Simon or McClintock had indeed won with 20 percent of the vote, he would have absolutely no mandate to govern. He would inherit a $38 billion deficit. He would face an overwhelming Democrat majority in the state legislature and the press. Moreover, being an isolated conservative with a small constituency, he would be unable to counter these disadvantages by going over the heads of the legislature and the media to the public to promote his agenda. He would have no popular base in the state. Thus, he would have no option to reduce the deficit by cutting the programs and payrolls fattened in the Davis years as the economy and state revenues were bottoming.

In other words a Republican victory would have led to the discrediting of fiscal conservatism and the prospect of twenty years of unchallenged liberal Democratic rule.

But the entrance of Arnold Schwarzenegger into the race has changed all that. Suddenly Republicans have an opportunity to take back the governorship, revive their all but dead party, and make themselves competitive again in the Golden State...

CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread

22 posted on 08/11/2003 3:37:18 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
It can't hurt, but I want to see Kemp or some other supply-siders getting on board soon. If we get little tax increases and little spending cuts from Arnold, he will just pilot the Titanic to the bottom and take Republicans with him.
23 posted on 08/11/2003 3:37:18 PM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; ALOHA RONNIE; DLfromthedesert; PatiPie; flamefront; onyx; SMEDLEYBUTLER; Irma; ...
See also, from www.hughhewitt.com:
August 8, 2003
Posted at 10:20 AM, Pacific

REASONS TO SUPPORT ARNOLD:

Rush is reported to be slamming the AS candidacy. I haven't heard him do so, but many conservatives are most definitely doing so, so here are the reasons why center-right Republicans and conservative Republicans should vote for AS:

1. AS can win. The others in the race who would make acceptable governors --Bill Simon, Tom McClintock, and Peter Ueberroth-- cannot marshall enough votes to top the almost certain 25 to 30% that Cruz Bustamante will roll up. Objectivity matters a great deal here, and even if AS hadn't gotten into the race, the presence of more than one "movement" candidate dooms them all. Period. End of story. Arguing this point doesn't change the facts on the ground.

2. AS is best positioned to withstand the Graystopo, as the slime machine Gray has perfected has come to be called. Even if there was only one movement conservative in the race, he would be a target that would be mercilessly mowed down. Complaining about it doesn't stop it from happening.

3. AS does great things for the candidacy of Tony Strickland against Boxer in '04 and of course puts California in play for President Bush. So he's closer to Pataki than to Reagan, so what. A candidate who wins and governs to my satisfaction 65 to 75% of the time is better than a candidate who talks like I talk and loses.

4. Imagine you are Jim DeMint and you need to raise some money. Wouldn't you love to be able to call the Bush people and ask them to get AS on a jet to Charleston for a little $1,000 a head gathering? This is what Bill Clinton does 24/7/365. AS is a hyperdraw, matched only by the President and the Veep. Three such draws is better than two.

5. Finally, the state is in desperate shape. AS is right, businesses and talent are fleeing. Unless the bleeding stops, this economy continues to drag the national economy down, and with them both, the re-elect numbers of the President.

The purists have to get over it and get behind a winning effort. - Hugh Hewitt


.

If you listen to Hugh Hewitt, or read his WND commentaries,
this PING list is for YOU!

Please post your comments, and BUMP!

(If you want OFF - or ON - my "Hugh Hewitt PING list" - please let me know)

24 posted on 08/11/2003 3:39:53 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
See also:

Mark Steyn: The Gubernator?
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 08/10/03 | Mark Steyn
Posted on 08/09/2003 5:43 PM PDT by Pokey78

Profile: Arnold Schwarzenegger

The best scene in The Last Action Hero (1993) was a clip from Laurence Olivier's Hamlet. Arnold Schwarzenegger, edited into the 1948 monochrome and taking dear Larry's role as the eponymous ditherer, starts off the soliloquy, cuts it short and opens fire on the castle, all the while puffing on his stogie. As the unseen narrator puts it, "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark - and Hamlet is takin' out the trash!"

A week ago, it looked as if the roles had been reversed. The conventional wisdom was that Ah-nuld wasn't man enough for California politics. Instead of saying "Hasta la vista, Gray Davis!" and blowing the punk out of the Governor's office, he was nancying around in doublet and hose whimpering, "To be or not to be, that is the question". He'd been scared off. His Kennedy wife didn't want him to run, and, besides, too many people had too much dirt on too many of the sexual perks your big-time Hollywood star avails himself of over the years. He was going to wiggle out, no doubt promising that "Ah'll be back, maybe next election, or the one after, if my wife will let me."

And so not for the first time the experts underestimated Schwarzenegger. On Wednesday's Tonight Show, he announced that he was in. Something is rotten in the State of California - and Arnie is takin' out the trash! Collyvurnja, here he comes!

Whether or not he'll win, nobody can say for certain: the rules of the recall election are as whimsical as a sudden-death gameshow round. The standard line is that it's a "circus", but pre-Arnie it was more of a freak show, filled by various unsatisfying midgets: the pornographer Larry Flynt; the diminutive ex-sitcom-player Gary Coleman; a bounty hunter from Sacramento; the extravagantly-endowed self-proclaimed "Love Goddess" Angelyne (she's a one-woman circus, if only in the sense that she has a big top); and the wannabe celebrity, obscure populist and rumoured fourth Gabor sister Arianna Stassinopoulos Huffington, best remembered in Britain (if at all) as Bernard Levin's ex-squeeze. But no matter how many little clowns pour out of the miniature car, it is the entry of the muscleman that has made this a circus worth seeing.

Whatever happens, he has played his opening hand at a crowded table brilliantly. Arnold has wanted to be Governor of California for two decades, but October 7 represents his best shot. For one thing, there's no primary election in a recall campaign. In a normal election, Arnie wouldn't stand a chance of getting his watered-down "moderate Republicanism" past the death-before-electability crowd who dominate GOP primaries in California. He's unsound on almost everything that matters to them. On the other hand, that supposedly puts him closer to the average voter...

CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread

25 posted on 08/11/2003 3:42:42 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
I made the prediction in about 1991 that Pete Wilson was going to be the next President. Boy was I off.
26 posted on 08/11/2003 3:43:10 PM PDT by Pappy Smear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
Thank God! It's nice to have somebody, like me, who would perfer a more conservative candidate, but is a realist.

If McClintock looks like he has a good chance come Oct, by all means vote for him, but I'm doubting thats going to be the case. Then, go for Arnold. I agree wholeheartedly.

27 posted on 08/11/2003 3:48:20 PM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
I believe we should wait until Arnold answers questions, any questions, at all, maybe even one question...before signing up.

I am encouraged that we have this kind of problem, either a RINO or possibly if the cards fall correctly, McClintock.

I'll wait and vote for either Tom if he has a realistic chance, or Arnold...enough said...

DD

28 posted on 08/11/2003 3:51:18 PM PDT by DiamondDon1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
I've never claimed to understand the dynamics of California politics...and for lots of reasons...I was initially a luke-warm (at best) supporter of the recall.

But now that it's here, I humbly ask my Califonia freeper friends to circle the wagons and put a Republican in the state house.

Anything less would be, IMHO, a psychological blow to momentum going into 2004.
29 posted on 08/11/2003 3:52:50 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
Here's the difference between Dems and Republicans: Dems scrambled after Arnold's announcement REALIZING he's BIG trouble for them and so what do they do? They only put up 1 NAME: Bustamonte...what do Republicans do? Send everyone and their dog out to enter, so that once AGAIN the democrats can just kick their butts back to the gutter and then steal their money after doing so! GET REAL...ARNOLD is the guy, for better or worse...SUCK it up and punch the card for the R or suffer the next fate of California: Bustamonte!
30 posted on 08/11/2003 3:57:33 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
Y'all listening?

Yep Totally predicatable. Birds of a feather. Pete Wilson nearly destroyed the GOP in California. Arnold has come along to finish the job.

31 posted on 08/11/2003 3:57:36 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider
It can't hurt, but I want to see Kemp or some other supply-siders getting on board soon.

You won't see that because Arnold favors BIGGER GOVERNMENT to take care of our children, so we can all get out and work to pay the higher taxes.

Kemp will endorse Simon again.

32 posted on 08/11/2003 4:01:05 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Yeah and that tool of the left Gingrich too, what a RINO he is.
And Ann Coulter, "Queen of the Squishy Liberal RINO-ettes" (not!) - who said some VERY nice things about Arnold on the Matt Drduge radio show last night.
Perhaps you actaully CAN deal with the reality of Arnold winning this thing and NOT be a baby-killing, dope-smoking, gun-grabbing liberal-in-disguise... :o)

33 posted on 08/11/2003 4:04:21 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Drango
It is good that Gingrich endorsed him, but what exactly did he base that on??? The Tonight Show appearance???

It would be nice to hear what Arnold has to say first before we proclaim him the winner.

Perhaps, just perhaps, we should make sure the cure is better than the disease...IMHO...

For those of you that must worry about such things, I will vote for McClintock only if he is viable, otherwise (even without hearing him actually say anything) it is Arnold, just wait, even a little, for the dust to clear...

DD

34 posted on 08/11/2003 4:07:13 PM PDT by DiamondDon1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
SUCK it up and punch the card for the R or suffer the next fate of California: Bustamonte!

WORD

35 posted on 08/11/2003 4:08:18 PM PDT by Drango (Democratic fundraising....If PBS won't do it, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider
Well my goodness gracious, when will Orrin Hatch throw support to Arnold???????????????????? C'mon Orrin!

GO ARNOLD!!!!!!!!!!
36 posted on 08/11/2003 4:12:03 PM PDT by CarmelValleyite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DiamondDon1
There is also an interesting POLL running on that wacky "left-wing" Internet forum called Free Republic:

Question ...


Who would you support for Governor of Califonia? (click here)

McClintock
234 votes - 30%

Simon
73 votes - 9%

Schwarzenegger
408 votes - 53%

Other
41 votes - 5%

756 votes total


37 posted on 08/11/2003 4:13:07 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Vote Arnold.

Unless you're a closet leftist.

You are! You are a closet leftist!

That settles it.
38 posted on 08/11/2003 4:13:18 PM PDT by Stallone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RonDog; *calgov2002; fooman; PeoplesRep_of_LA; Canticle_of_Deborah; NormsRevenge; snopercod; ...
Thanks for the ping!

calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



39 posted on 08/11/2003 4:14:22 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DiamondDon1
Arnold has been around Republican political circles longer than the 'purist' Libertarian right-wing pot smoking unemployed idiots who can't quite explain why the GOP doesn't currently exist in California.

I thought only Greens were suicidal idealogues.

Looks like the right wing has a few wing nuts in the mix.

Phuck 'Em!

Vote Arnold, and win California.
40 posted on 08/11/2003 4:17:26 PM PDT by Stallone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson