Please explain what is accomplished by voting for Arinold Schwartzekennedy, when that will result in the election of a leftist Riordan hand-puppet to finish the destruction of California.
The Republicans in TN and IL tried your strategy five years ago and accomplished ABSOLUTELY NOTHING with their RINO governors. I remember "moderate" Republicans pleading with me to elect George Ryan because "we CANNOT let the Democrats win during Clinton's impeachment -- we have to send a message by voting STRAIGHT REPUBLICAN". Well, their little corrupt RINO won without my help and proceeding to raise taxes, promote abortion, cuddle with Castro, almost completely ban guns (stopped only by the Senate Republicans balking), and freed all the murderers on death row. The liberal media beat up on Bush in Illinois for not being as "compassionate" as George was to the murderers, and George said nothing but offered some token 'endorsement' to Bush-- even though he couldn't think of ANYTHING they agreed on other than building a third airport in the Chicago area. Then Ryan went around saying the GOP deserved to lose when the "hard right" in the legislature wouldn't endorse his socialist agenda. He actually was silent during redistricting and made sure more 'RATs were elected to keep his "vision" for Illinois intact. The state GOP won't recover for another 40 years thanks to electing a scumbag RINO who "could win".
And isn't it funny how the ARINOLD backers keep screaming McClintock (lost statewide by less than 1%) "can't win", but G.W. Bush (lost statewide by 12%+ will magically be a "shoo-in" as long as ARINOLD is Governor?
So you would prefer Schwarzenegger to finish the destruction of California? Personally, I don't think it matters which liberal Democrat finishes the destruction of California. Davis, Schwarzenegger, Bustamante, Riordan - - who cares? I just hope it hurrys up and happens soon so maybe I can witness a civilized state rise from the ashes.