Skip to comments.
Age of consent examined in Channel 4 sex series
The Telegraph (UK) ^
| 8/6/2003
| Tom Leonard
Posted on 08/05/2003 4:56:34 PM PDT by sjersey
Channel 4 is to examine whether the age of consent should be lowered to 14 in a series of programmes devoted to teenage sex, it said yesterday.
The Adult At 14 season will offer a "realistic examination of teenage sexuality" in a succession of programmes highlighting the increasingly sexualised world in which children grow up.
In one episode, Age Of Consent, the presenter, Miranda Sawyer, argues that sex below the age of 16 should be legalised.
Another documentary, Porn To Be Young, will interview young people about their attitude towards pornography, while in 14 Alone, a group of 10 14-year-old boys and girls will be allowed to spend five days and nights together in a house without adult supervision, television or computer games.
This is a follow-up to Boys Alone and the subsequent Girls Alone, a televised social experiment that attracted criticism for putting a group of 11-year-olds in a house to fend for themselves.
The programme claims it will offer an insight into "this tender age when children are on the cusp of adulthood".
A Channel 4 spokesman stressed that rules would be imposed and a camera crew would be present at all times to ensure things did not get out of hand. "This is not like Big Brother where they are left completely alone. There will be cameramen in the house with them," she said.
Although the season focuses on the subject of teenage sexuality, sex will be banned in the house.
Channel 4 will also screen Pleasureland, a feature-length drama set in Liverpool about the pressures on teenagers to have sex before the age of 16.
The channel, which has been criticised in the past for packing its schedules with supposedly serious-minded programmes about sex, will also broadcast Pornography: The Musical, an assortment of sex workers singing about their lives.
Away from sex, Channel 4's new autumn season heavily indulges another human obsession, with seven different series about the property market and people moving home.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: ageofconsent; catholiclist; channel4; childabuse; familyhour; mtv; nbc; pg; pornification; pornography; primetime; r; ratings; television; tv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
1
posted on
08/05/2003 4:56:35 PM PDT
by
sjersey
To: sjersey
If the age of consent is lowered, those who become able to consent are then free to engage in sex with adults. Isn't that true?
How are parents supposed to react to their children dating 53 year old men out in the open?
2
posted on
08/05/2003 5:01:03 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(I might not be leigion, but then I'm not ashamed of what I say enough to post under different names.)
To: DoughtyOne
How are parents supposed to react to their children dating 53 year old men out in the open? Violently
To: sjersey
I've noticed that kids are suddenly adults when it comes to urging them to have sex at ever increasingly younger ages. Yet, when one of those kids brutally murders someone, they can't be considered an adult.
To: Texaggie79
I know you'll be watching this one closely.
To: sjersey
Remember when they were trying to get it down to 16?
Depravity knows no bounds. Does society?
6
posted on
08/05/2003 5:06:00 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: Paul Atreides
Uh, you're wrong on both points. Kids (12+) used to get married. The higher marriage ages is a recent phenomenon.
On your second point more and more teenagers under 18 are being tried as adults since many states passed laws allowing it in the 90s.
7
posted on
08/05/2003 5:06:15 PM PDT
by
breakem
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: TheOtherOne
There's one way to stop this nonsense. You put a 72 year old crusty toothless male on the tube sitting right beside a 14 year old cutie with his arm around her, and have him plead advocate for the lowering of the age of consent. That ought to about do it!
9
posted on
08/05/2003 5:08:01 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(I might not be leigion, but then I'm not ashamed of what I say enough to post under different names.)
To: breakem
On your second point more and more teenagers under 18 are being tried as adults since many states passed laws allowing it in the 90s.I'm talking about the viewpoint of liberals.
To: Paul Atreides
Didn't know you were bilingual. LOL!
11
posted on
08/05/2003 5:08:54 PM PDT
by
breakem
To: breakem
Uh, you're wrong on both points. Kids (12+) used to get married. The higher marriage ages is a recent phenomenon.Plus, there is a difference in a person that age getting married and one out on the streets having one night stands with old farts.
To: grayout
We used to allow children to work in factories for twelve hours a day. Should we return to that practice as well?
I do not support the reduction of age of consent. It would be abused by those who would prey on these kids.
13
posted on
08/05/2003 5:10:12 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(I might not be leigion, but then I'm not ashamed of what I say enough to post under different names.)
To: Paul Atreides
Yeah, one makes more money for her trouble. I think you should quit while you're behind.
14
posted on
08/05/2003 5:10:30 PM PDT
by
breakem
To: sjersey
This is NOT about teens having sex, it is DRIVEN ENTRIELY by gay men who want to have sex with male children. NAMBLA and the IMBLA are the chief proponents of changing the age of consent. PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN, EXPOSE NAMBLA!
To: DoughtyOne
If the age of consent is lowered, those who become able to consent are then free to engage in sex with adults. Isn't that true?
***
This is a major objective of the Gayhadist movement. They want access to our kids.
16
posted on
08/05/2003 5:11:08 PM PDT
by
Bigg Red
To: DoughtyOne
I don't think anyone here is supporting 12 year olds having sex. Just pointing out that the "good old days" were necessarilly so.
17
posted on
08/05/2003 5:11:25 PM PDT
by
breakem
To: Bigg Red
That's my perception as well. No way!
18
posted on
08/05/2003 5:12:05 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(I might not be leigion, but then I'm not ashamed of what I say enough to post under different names.)
To: breakem
were NOT necessarilly so.
19
posted on
08/05/2003 5:12:06 PM PDT
by
breakem
To: breakem
Why? I didn't say that I thought it was correct that children at that age were married off. However, just because it used to happen doesn't mean that it still should.
Anyway, who says anyone is making any money off of it?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson