1 posted on
08/03/2003 12:19:58 PM PDT by
LakeLady
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: LakeLady
This is my first post. Sorry in advance for any errors. I hope it is not a repeat. I searched long and hard before posting.
2 posted on
08/03/2003 12:23:00 PM PDT by
LakeLady
(Obstinacy is the curse of the ill informed; determination is the fruit of enlightenment.)
To: LakeLady
I can't wait for this story to be trumpeted in the NY Times, Wash Post, CBS, Nightline, 60 Minutes, ABC, NBC, etc., etc., etc..
I can't wait because I'll be waiting for something that will never happen. What will continue to happen is the trumpeting of stories of anti-American Iraqis.
4 posted on
08/03/2003 12:26:10 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been suspended or banned.)
To: LakeLady
btttt
5 posted on
08/03/2003 12:27:34 PM PDT by
ellery
To: LakeLady
But... but... I thought Islam is the religion of peace. Am I wrong? /sarcasm.
7 posted on
08/03/2003 12:32:32 PM PDT by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: LakeLady
Looks good, you did well, good post. Thanks.
8 posted on
08/03/2003 12:34:43 PM PDT by
blam
To: LakeLady
BTW, I live by a lake in Alabama too.
10 posted on
08/03/2003 12:35:38 PM PDT by
blam
To: LakeLady
At best, the major networks will gloss over this story.
How much longer will we, the silent majority, sit back and watch our country's press churn out lies and ignore the truth? How long before our second civil war occurs?
11 posted on
08/03/2003 12:35:45 PM PDT by
O.C. - Old Cracker
(When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
To: LakeLady
Very good, if chilling, first post. Of course, the war still can't be justified because we haven't found the WMD's yet. < /sarcasm >
17 posted on
08/03/2003 1:00:29 PM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: LakeLady
So, the Liberals think Iraq would be better off with these monsters still in power?
Probably not. But if were a choice of Iraq being ruled by the Husseins or the United States governed by the GOP, guess which vision would win their hearts?
28 posted on
08/03/2003 2:08:39 PM PDT by
Gritty
To: LakeLady
SADDAM WAS A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION!
To: LakeLady
Good job BTTT.
30 posted on
08/03/2003 3:16:41 PM PDT by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: LakeLady
Stand at the mass grave at al-Hillah where up to 15,000 people are buried, hands tied behind their backs, bullets through their brains nope. no weapons of mass destruction here.
the peace first crowd has blood on their hands, and mouths.
31 posted on
08/03/2003 3:18:57 PM PDT by
alrea
To: LakeLady
Yeah, but what about the weapons of mass destruction?
{/sarcasim}
36 posted on
08/03/2003 3:31:04 PM PDT by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: LakeLady
37 posted on
08/03/2003 3:38:13 PM PDT by
backhoe
(Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
To: LakeLady
Some one I know lost a hand in a similar machine. It shreds anything.
38 posted on
08/03/2003 3:42:13 PM PDT by
mlmr
(Am I having fun yet???)
To: LakeLady
You done good. Then again what do I know...I'm either not Logged In..or...I'm breaking the Internet.
It's a long story
Welcome aboard.
41 posted on
08/03/2003 3:52:32 PM PDT by
Focault's Pendulum
(I just sold Canada on E Bay..Pay Pal is giving me a hard time with the credit card transaction.)
To: LakeLady
Ann Clwyd is a leftist Labour memeber of Parliament. But with Tony Blair all the way on this one.
43 posted on
08/03/2003 4:07:41 PM PDT by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: LakeLady
Good article. And the
BaghdadBulletin.com website that it came from is an interesting source.
I've been searching for direct news sources that are on the ground in Iraq, reporting on what is really going on in Iraq. I especially want to find English language sources.
I'm not sure what to make of the Baghdad Bulletin. At first, it appeard to be a good source of information from inside Iraq. I posted a few stories from that site (possibly even this article) a couple weeks ago.
Now, I'm not 100% certain that it is entirely legitimate, though.
The domain name is registered to a London, England address, not to an address in Iraq. Also, the web site is hosted in the USA (Colorado I think when I traced it). That's not an indication that the site is bogus. Actually, hosting the site on a U.S. server that's well secured by an experienced U.S. hosting service is probably a good idea for any Iraqi newspaper on the web. It will help to avoid denial of service attacks and hacking from Baathist hackers.
Finally, some of the "reporters" appear to be British nationals who originally went to Iraq as "human shields." Others are environmental activists (Greenpeace members, etc.). At this point, I think they are a better information source than our own American media, or the British and European media outlets. But I'm still not sure what they are publishing is as close to what is really happening on the ground in Iraq as we might like.
Having said all that, I check their site every few days to see what they say. I just take some of their reports with an appropriate grain of salt. Usually it calls for a smaller grain of salt than say CNN or ABC News, but I'm still not sure they deliver the unfiltered truth.
45 posted on
08/03/2003 4:08:53 PM PDT by
cc2k
To: LakeLady
Thanks for a great article. I wish it'd see the light of day in our US liberal media. I actually feel sick to my stomach at the depravity of that regime. I don't find any presence of God in their actions. Is that what Evil Incarnate looks like?
To: Temple Owl
ping
53 posted on
08/03/2003 5:05:14 PM PDT by
Tribune7
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson