Posted on 08/02/2003 2:16:57 PM PDT by Lessismore
The US Army has dispatched a team of medical experts to Iraq to investigate a spate of serious pneumonia cases among its troops.
Military officials say two soldiers have died of the pneumonia and more than 100 are ill.
Army medical authorities say they are concerned because the pneumonia is attacking healthy, young soldiers, which means it is likely to be a virulent strain.
Authorities say there is no evidence of chemical, biological, or environmental toxins involved in the troops' illness, and SARS [severe acute respiratory syndrome] has also been ruled out.
See also http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/956369/posts
U.S. probes pneumonia among troops in Gulf
ASSOCIATED PRESS
The Army is trying to figure out what is causing a rash of serious pneumonia cases, including two fatalities, among troops serving in the Iraq war.
A six-person team of specialists was en route to Iraq yesterday to investigate 15 cases of pneumonia so serious that patients had to be put on ventilators to breathe and were evacuated from the region, the Army Surgeon General's Office said yesterday.
Two soldiers died, 10 recovered and three remained hospitalized as of yesterday, spokeswoman Lyn Kukral said. Most were in the Army, but at least one was a Marine.
The team on its way to Iraq includes infectious disease experts, laboratory officers and people who will take samples of soil, water and air.
So far, officials have identified no infectious agent common to all the cases. Officials said there was no evidence that any of the cases was caused by exposure to chemical or biological weapons, environmental toxins or SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome, the disease first noted in China this year.
A two-person team already has gone to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany, where most of the cases were treated after evacuation. The two teams also will review patient records and laboratory results and interview health care workers and patients, if possible, the Army surgeon general and U.S. Army Medical Command said in a statement.
The teams will be looking for similarities among the cases, which so far have hit troops in geographically dispersed areas and from different units, the Thursday statement said. They also were spread over time, with three in March, three in April, two in May, three in June and four in July.
Most of the cases were in Iraq and occurred after the U.S.-led invasion began March 20, although some were among other troops deployed to the region in support of the campaign. Troops also were sent to Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and other countries, but no breakdown was available on the number of cases outside Iraq, Miss Kukral said.
Though only 15 cases were considered serious, about 100 cases have been diagnosed since March 1 among troops that began deploying late last year to the Persian Gulf area.
Armywide, pneumonia cases serious enough to warrant hospitalization happen in about nine of 10,000 soldiers per year. Given the number of troops deployed, the 100 cases "do not exceed expectations," the Surgeon General's Office said.
Armywide, pneumonia cases serious enough to warrant hospitalization happen in about nine of 10,000 soldiers per year. Given the number of troops deployed, the 100 cases "do not exceed expectations," the Surgeon General's Office said.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/957130/posts?page=9#9
It is normal for the soldiers to have a few minor problems as they get used to a new environment--upset stomachs, minor headaches, sniffles, etc. But that happens soon after arrival and ends pretty quickly--it does not get worse and should not be still occurring to these guys.
Because of the Gulf War Syndrome problems after DESERT STORM, the Army this time has done a much better job of compiling medical histories--took blood samples, etc-- prior to deployment so they have a good baseline to work from--helps identify what was caused by something that occurred in theater versus what soldiers already had or didn't have.
Who knows, this could have been a problem during the last few years of the saddam regime.
Our mainstream press would have never reported it. Remember that admission by CNN that they did saddam's bidding because they wanted the "prestige" of having a CNN office in Baghdad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.