Deimos is okay. Phobos is better. The point is that we don't have to land on Mars, but can build our Mars base on one of the moons. Much easier, much safer.
To: RightWhale
All your moons are belong to us.
2 posted on
07/29/2003 9:05:19 AM PDT by
talleyman
(E=mc2 (before taxes))
To: KevinDavis
ping
4 posted on
07/29/2003 9:15:20 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(Destroy the dark; restore the light)
To: RightWhale
"Nobody has been able to explain the origin of Phobos and Deimos," said S. Fred Singer of the University of Virginias Science & Environmental Policy Project in Arlington, Virginia. Unfortunately, nobody has been able to explain the origin of any moon in our solar system. Why should Phobos and Deimos be any different?
7 posted on
07/29/2003 9:19:51 AM PDT by
far sider
To: RightWhale
"The scientist believes the moon would serve as a natural space station for future human explorers."
But what do you do when the Space Marines discover a demon-infested gateway to Hell? </Doom>
To: RightWhale
We should have been informed of this years ago. What was the president trying to hide?
9 posted on
07/29/2003 9:29:56 AM PDT by
zook
To: RightWhale
Singer said Phobos will die in a few million years. "Were lucky in the sense that were seeing Phobos while its still around," he said. I'll say we're lucky! Another few million years and we'd have missed the whole thing!!
11 posted on
07/29/2003 9:31:50 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(France delenda est)
To: RightWhale
Phoebos and Deimos are two asteroid generation ships which took up orbit around Mars sometime prior to 1877. The crews have since been exploring the Solar System and account for all those UFO sightings.
Hey, I can come up with just as plausible a conspiracy theory as anyone else!
15 posted on
07/29/2003 9:53:03 AM PDT by
Junior
(Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
To: RightWhale
What if Mars were a moon of a large planet whose remnants now make up the asteroid belt? The shape of Mars suggest that it was in synchronous orbit of a large object or a large object was in synchronous orbit with it. If Mars was a moon of a large planet and that large planet disentegrated for some reason, the odds of pieces of that planet being stationary relative to Mars may be low enough that there is only two pieces (Phobos and Deimos) left today in circular orbit (interesting that Deimos is in nearly syncronous orbit). The disentagration process may be what pushed Mars to it's orbit now or perhaps the disentgration took place at the right moment in Mars' orbit around the large planet to take Mars to it's current orbit. Mars shows signs of being plastered on one side by debris miles thick, like a person's head in a pie fight. Whatever happened, it happened in one day, not over the course of thousands of years. It seems to me by measuring the nodes on Mars (nodes created by the synchronous orbit), we could estimate the size of the object that was either orbiting Mars or the object Mars was orbiting, whichever the case may be.
17 posted on
07/29/2003 10:04:49 AM PDT by
#3Fan
To: Berosus; Swordmaker
51 posted on
05/03/2005 9:37:22 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(FR profiled updated Monday, April 11, 2005. Fewer graphics, faster loading.)
To: RightWhale
Some alien tried to land a rock on Mars and used feet instead of meters in their calculations. It hit hard, broke in two and bounced up into orbit.
52 posted on
05/03/2005 9:47:59 AM PDT by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
59 posted on
04/02/2006 3:02:36 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
60 posted on
05/13/2006 7:15:12 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
61 posted on
10/10/2007 9:51:20 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Friday, October 5, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson