Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Senate OKs 'gender identity' bill [Hey guy, Nice dress]
SF Chronicle ^ | July 25, 2003 | Jim Herron Zamora

Posted on 07/25/2003 7:29:10 AM PDT by ZGuy

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:43:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

A divided state Senate voted along party lines Thursday for a bill banning discrimination against people whose "gender identity" is different from their biological sex at birth.

Assembly Bill 196, if signed by the governor, would provide sweeping new rights to transsexuals. It was approved 23-11 with six senators either not voting or not present.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: genderiddisorder; genderidentity; homosexual; homosexualagenda; prisoners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
This is a return of last year’s “Hey Mister, nice dress.” This bill prohibits any employer, including school administrators and non-profit organizations such as churches, from disallowing any employee to come to work dressed in any manner that best expresses that person’s “gender identity" even if that person changes which gender they identify with every other day.

In essence, this means that a 200-pound, bearded male could come to work dressed in high heels and a dress, and the employer could not send him home to change. To do so would be an act of discrimination punishable with a fine of up to $150,000 per occurrence.

Other acts of discrimination includes looks or glances which could be interpreted as non-acceptance by the cross-dressser.

The bill is currently on Gray Davis' desk awating his signature.

1 posted on 07/25/2003 7:29:10 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
While these guys are re-writing the language, why can't they come up with a non-gender pronoun? When I was in school, 30-40 years ago, the grammer books stated that male pronouns like 'he', included 'she.' Then the feminist came along and took females out of the male pronouns. Personally, I liked being a part of "Where no Man Has Gone Before."
2 posted on 07/25/2003 7:42:10 AM PDT by eccentric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Now that this problem (excuse me, I meant "issue") is solved, maybe the Senators will have time to turn their attention to the state's bankruptcy.
3 posted on 07/25/2003 7:44:57 AM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
In essence, this means that a 200-pound, bearded male could come to work dressed in high heels and a dress, and the employer could not send him home to change.

....my husband and I were talking about this the other night and he said he would have no problem hiring some one like this.

He said he would just send them out on a delivery of a pool table to a house where the table was to be placed on a second or third floor.

Can you just invision a guy in heels carrying a 300 pound piece slate up two or three floors?

Surely he would leave the next day, don't ya think!!!!!!

4 posted on 07/25/2003 7:57:29 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
ANOTHER QUEER BILL!!!!
5 posted on 07/25/2003 8:01:05 AM PDT by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
" A person's gender identity has nothing to do with their ability to pay rent or to act as a competent employee, and we should not tolerate such arbitrary discrimination. "

This is one of the most ridiculous contentions I've ever heard.

6 posted on 07/25/2003 8:13:55 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Well, good to see that Gray Davis and the legislature are dealing with the important issues at this time of crisis.
7 posted on 07/25/2003 8:35:26 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
....watch for Gay Davis to sign every piece of Gay BS he can before we get him out of office!!!!!
8 posted on 07/25/2003 8:40:01 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Be prepared - Davis and the Lib Legislature are going to go crazy pandering to every crazy interest group they can find. Mexifornia is a real possibility between now and October 7th.
9 posted on 07/25/2003 8:41:58 AM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malesherbes
My thoughts exactly...what a bunch of jokers.
10 posted on 07/25/2003 8:44:33 AM PDT by Prysson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Ping
11 posted on 07/25/2003 9:14:11 AM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
The next step, of course, will be the insistence that they can use the restrooms and other facilities for their chosen "gender".
12 posted on 07/25/2003 9:17:30 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
That's not the next step, that's this step. Under this bill you can not in any way object to or disapprove of a person using any restroom they wish as long as they say they identify with that gender at the time they are using the restroom. To do so would be considered discriminatory and subject to a fine.
13 posted on 07/25/2003 9:28:36 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Dang, isn't CA ever going to fall into the ocean?
14 posted on 07/25/2003 9:30:30 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
Actually just getting rid of the major metropolitan areas near the coast would do it. The rest of California is OK. "THE MAP" illustrates this :


15 posted on 07/25/2003 9:43:08 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
And they are content to stop with the governor?

What sort of madness prevails?

16 posted on 07/25/2003 10:09:30 AM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Actually just getting rid of the major metropolitan areas near the coast would do it.

Hmm, pretty much along the west side of the San Andreas Fault. Even Mother Nature is a Republican.

17 posted on 07/25/2003 10:44:09 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; ...
Busy day, ping.

Homosexual Agenda Index
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search
All FreeRepublic Bump Lists

18 posted on 07/25/2003 10:54:06 AM PDT by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
If the bill is signed into law, California would join New Mexico, Rhode Island and Minnesota in offering such protections.

Four places not to do business in or reside.

19 posted on 07/25/2003 11:04:25 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimt
Just curious, how so? You don't think the discrimination exists or you don't think the person is entitled to be protected from discrimination if it does exist?
20 posted on 07/25/2003 8:52:44 PM PDT by ScrtAccess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson