Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Dick Durbin Dec 17, 1998 Don't Question Press Clinton's Attack on Iraq, Need Unity
Senator Dick Durbin ^ | July 24, 2003 | the eagle has landed

Posted on 07/24/2003 10:36:44 AM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Mo1
Durbin Bump. What a disgusting pig.
41 posted on 07/24/2003 12:28:28 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Have you noticed Daschle has been quieted by the media lately? It goes to show that a Dem's credibility can be smeared by his own words.
42 posted on 07/24/2003 12:29:06 PM PDT by m1-lightning (Two liberals don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SpinyNorman
The RNC should be making 5,10,15 second radio/tv spots with a simple: "Who said this?" Then read the statement, and give the author and date.

What a SUPER IDEA!!!!!

hey RNC....SpinyNorman has a FABULOUS idea!!!

43 posted on 07/24/2003 12:31:19 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
wow. I hoped that maybe someone jammed a lacrosse ball in his mouth and then ran about half a roll of duct tape around his head. But your explanation does sound plausible.
44 posted on 07/24/2003 12:37:54 PM PDT by .cnI redruM ("Yall can go to _ _ _ _, and I will go to Texas" - Davey Crockett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: All
Just to be fair, what was the reaction of most Repubs to the strike: positive, or negative?

I know sometimes we said Clinton was "wagging the dog." I just was curious if many did in this case or not. If so, the Dems could just respond that we didn't believe Clinton when he did it, so why should they believe Bush?
45 posted on 07/24/2003 12:49:24 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Of course, if the GOP reaction was mostly positive, then we got something to hit the Dems over the head with.
46 posted on 07/24/2003 12:49:56 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
It is gold, isn't it? He actually says that not JUST supporting the troops, but SUPPORTING THE PRESIDENT NO MATTER WHAT is required to "honor the troops."

That's funny, as they are attacking us now for saying the same thing....:)
47 posted on 07/24/2003 12:51:44 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
read later
48 posted on 07/24/2003 1:27:21 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
bttt
49 posted on 07/24/2003 2:09:49 PM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: All
The Clintons's
Past, Present, Future
THE EMEMY WITHIN

But, that doesn't mean
we can't try to stop them!!

Flowers' Clinton lawsuit revived

Judge rules conspiracy claim against former first lady, aides may proceed

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2003/Jul-23-Wed-2003/news/21787501.html

see also
http://www.judicialwatch.org to donate to the lawsuit or learn more about this important case that just may topple Hillary Rodham Clinton's political aspirations!!!



50 posted on 07/24/2003 2:11:22 PM PDT by Joy Angela (Freep Hillary at a Book Signing Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded; ALOHA RONNIE; rodeo-mamma
Ping to interesting topic!!
51 posted on 07/24/2003 2:12:00 PM PDT by Joy Angela (Freep Hillary at a Book Signing Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded; All
I have sent this to Hannity.

The reason is - today on his radio show - HE NUKED CHARLES RANGEL. What Sean did was read x42's 12/16/98 speech - without telling Rangel it was Clinton's speech. Sean just kept saying, "the President".

Rangel's typical response was that the whole speech was a total lie because "the President" didn't have intel to support it. After Rangel had jumped in the pile with both feet - Sean informed him it was Clinton's speech from 1998.

Which proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that EVERYTHING the dems are saying is PURE POLITICS!! NOTHING MORE.
52 posted on 07/24/2003 2:12:27 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: TheEaglehasLanded
Consider it done! I sent the article to Teri O'Brien at WLS 890 in Chicago.
54 posted on 07/24/2003 4:27:41 PM PDT by Rollee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rollee
bttt
55 posted on 07/24/2003 7:57:13 PM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Do you have anymore links of the rats take on Iraq during the Clinton administration?
56 posted on 07/24/2003 10:32:53 PM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yonif
BTTT
57 posted on 07/26/2003 8:25:43 AM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson