Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
" Is the supplimental medication enhancement bill also a result of me sitting on my couch?"

Presuming that it passes with the House's Medicare privatization option in it, the supplimental medication bill will be yet another example of how Bush is privitatizing, rather than socializing, federal government (e.g. Bush's move to put more than 400,000 federal job positions up for competitive bids, Bush's proposal to privatize Social Security, Bush's move to abolish the federal "fair wage" standard for contractors, etc.).

Bush is no Revolutionary. He is an Incrementalist. What he delivers, and deliver he does, is through baby steps.

Sure, he gives the Left's causes more funding. Sure, he spends too much.

But what do we get from such spending?

Well, the Left gets a bigger Educational monstrosity, and the Right gets the ability to fire bad teachers, test teachers, and demand that schools meet minimum standards (e.g. being able to read before you can graduate high school), as well as the ability to finally shut down failing local schools such as those found in inner cities.

Sure, the Left gets money for AIDS, and the Right gets full funding for our military, for our Intelligence Agencies, and for the actual construction of and implementation of our Alaskan ABM system.

An ideologue can point to what Bush gives up in his negotiations and dealings, and make a pretty strong case that Bush is spending us into oblivion and that Bush is helping the Left...but only if said ideologue is willing to deliberately ignore what it is that Bush is winning for us with those concessions.

You want to claim that Bush is spending too much? Fine. You'll get no argument from me on that point.

Just don't pretend that Bush isn't getting anything for all of that spending.

More than 125 federal judges have been approved for Bush. Bush has repealed the dividend double tax, killed the estate tax, and reduced federal income taxes so much that now a family of four earning $40,000 per year only pays a net sum of fourty-five Dollars in federal income taxes.

Private school choice vouchers are now on deck, something that will single-handedly destroy the publci school teachers' unions.

Bush will be signing a BAN on partial birth abortion this fall (already passed in both the House and Senate, needs only to be rectified between the two chambers).

Hussein is out of power in Iraq. The Taliban no longer control Afghanistan. Islamic Madrassah schools are no longer being freely encouraged to train terrorists throughout the Muslim world. Iran and Syria now fear to give overt aid to Palestinian terrorists in Israel.

Frankly, history books will express complete amazement at all that Bush was able to accomplish with a divided Congress and nation.

Was he able to do it all ideally, without yielding anything to the Left? Of course not. This is not an ideal world.

But that fact is hardly Bush's fault.

212 posted on 08/03/2003 4:48:38 PM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
A sincere BUMP for your analysis.
218 posted on 08/03/2003 5:07:06 PM PDT by justshe (Educate....not Denigrate !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

To: Southack
Presuming that it passes with the House's Medicare privatization option in it, the supplimental medication bill will be yet another example of how Bush is privitatizing, rather than socializing, federal government (e.g. Bush's move to put more than 400,000 federal job positions up for competitive bids, Bush's proposal to privatize Social Security, Bush's move to abolish the federal "fair wage" standard for contractors, etc.).

This would be funny if it weren't so tragic.  Privatization means that a private citizen pays into an insurance fund and the federal government never becomes involved.  It would not act as a middle-man with tax dollars.  It dosen't mean that private citizens pay the federal government tax dollars, and it open bids for private contractors to fulfill them.

If this was privitization the federal government wouldn't be projecting and earmarking $450 billion (but what will turn into trillions of) dollars worth of tax ependitures to fulfill this new obligation.

This is a new program.  It's going to be paid for by tax dollars.  That is not privatization whether private sector contractors facilitate this or not.

The social security issue has the same problem.  Bush will put more than 400,000 federal job positions up for bids.  All this means is that 400,000 people will be getting pay cuts and moving off the government payroll.  That's not such a bad thing by the way  But guess who will still wind up paying their salaries?  The US taxpayer will.

Once again, to privitize something you take government out of the equation all together.  The way to privatize social security is to slowly increase what people save in their TSAs, while slowly decreasing what they will get from Social Security when they retire.  It'g going to take quite a while to accomplish this, but it should begin today.

219 posted on 08/03/2003 5:07:47 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson