Replies

"Nonsense. You're just looking for ways to take swipes at Republicans."

The evidence is in, I can't help it if you choose to keep your eyes nailed shut. I visited a small town yesterday called Olney, with a population of under 1,500. The residents were upset because the Fed has built apartments there and pay those on welfare to live there. They have no jobs, some are immigrants some are illegals, and they have brought the gangsta lifestyle of theft and intimidation with them. When I posted this finding on FR I received several responses about other small towns that this has happened to.

This has also happened in my neighborhood where H.U.D. has slipped illegals into homes. Have you bothered to study what the Fed's definition of Free Trade Zone is? It's no sovereign borders from the North of Canada to the tip of Cape Horn. You may live up north where it hasn't hit as bad, but if you can't look around and see that both parties are out to erase the people, their culture and institutions that founded this nation I don't know what to tell you except put some study into the issue of Free Trade, read a few quotes from your Supreme Court who are studing international law so if there is a conflict with the Constitution they will know which one to scrap, guess which one will be scrapped when you have a justice that makes the comment, "The Constitution becomes a less viable document the more we become one people". Globalism is a bad deal for the founding citizens of the United States.

You can wave bye bye to all of it if all we can do is ditter around with which party gets to be in charge of erasing our existance. We need another party and fast.

"We need another party and fast."

No, we don't. The whole 3rd Party spiel is designed to syphon Conservative voters away from Republicans long-enough for Democrats to win more elections.

That's why the **largest** two donors to the Alabama Libertarian Party are Democratic trial lawyers.

Lenin used the phrase "useful idiots" to describe the way such "conservatives" could be duped into stabbing their own kind.

So Olney has less than 1,500 people now? The last time that I was there it was a thriving oil town. I suspect that it still is, too. Those are some tough Texans there.

Did you ever see the two crooks from Olney Savings go to jail for killing that S&L back in the 1980's?

Well, I saw it.

But back to the subject at hand, my point was that you were posting nonsense that had the sole aim of taking a gratuitous swipe at Republicans.

To wit: you **claimed** that Republicans wanted to actively erase our sovereign borders.

To refute that claim, I pointed out that the Republicans would **not** have killed the globalists' wet dreams of their Kyoto Global Warming Treaty, the International Criminal court, and the U.S. - CCCP ABM treaty if they were truly interested in erasing sovereign borders.

If you have to post such border-erasing fabrications in order to make your own argument look compelling, then at heart your argument probably isn't compelling at all.

Something to think about.

"Have you bothered to study what the Fed's definition of Free Trade Zone is? It's no sovereign borders from the North of Canada to the tip of Cape Horn."

Wow!

So you are now **claiming** that our Federal Government has a formal legal definition of a Free Trade Zone being no sovereign borders?!

I tell you what, you show me just one legitimate U.S. government web source that posts an official government definition of a free trade zone that matches your "no sovereign borders" claim above, and I'll carry the tag line of your choice from now until Friday.

Now, do you believe in your claim strongly enough to mirror my tag line bet back to me? I mean, you did question whether I had even "bothered" studying this issue, after...

I tell you what, you show me just one legitimate U.S. government web source that posts an official government definition of a free trade zone that matches your "no sovereign borders" claim (post #164), and I'll carry the tag line of your choice from now until Friday.

Now, do you believe in your claim strongly enough to mirror my tag line bet back to me? I mean, you did question whether I had even "bothered" studying this issue, after all...