Skip to comments.
Is Mel Gibson's film passion for Jesus misplaced?
The Boston Globe ^
| 7/22/03
| Alex Beam
Posted on 07/23/2003 6:20:57 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:10:31 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
A fair amount of attention, although not necessarily the attention one would seek, attends the production of ''The Passion,'' Mel Gibson's movie about the last days of Jesus Christ. Making a movie about Christ is a surefire path to instant publicity, most of it negative. And when one of the most bankable stars in the English-speaking world is backing the project, you can bet Christ won't go quietly this time.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; jesus; melgibson; passion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
I'm speechless. I mean, I shouldn't expect more from the Globe but... damn. This is high crap. Crap has been elevated to an art form.
To: *Catholic_list; Hermann the Cherusker
You have to see this. It's pathetic, but funny.
2
posted on
07/23/2003 6:22:18 AM PDT
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Aquinasfan
Alex Beam is merely spouting, word for word, the Jesus Seminar's own press.
He's an unthinking mouthpiece who has literally no conception of what he's discussing.
3
posted on
07/23/2003 6:22:42 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
To: Aquinasfan
4
posted on
07/23/2003 6:25:00 AM PDT
by
elenchus
To: Aquinasfan
Egad. Words fail me.
5
posted on
07/23/2003 6:26:52 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(I'm a right wingnut, I admit it!)
To: wideawake
He's an unthinking mouthpiece who has literally no conception of what he's discussing. That's literally true, and that's what I find so fascinating. This story passed through the hands of at least one editor, who must also have had literally no conception of what he was reading.
6
posted on
07/23/2003 6:27:56 AM PDT
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Aquinasfan
What kills me is that he won't come right out and say that he hasn't seen the movie.
What a tool.
To: Aquinasfan
"Whatever Gibson's intentions, the film will be perceived as anti-Semitic, because the Christian Bible holds that Jesus was a Jewish prophet rejected and betrayed by his own people."
What?
8
posted on
07/23/2003 6:30:58 AM PDT
by
Kwilliams
To: Aquinasfan
the film will be perceived as anti-Semitic, because the Christian Bible holds that Jesus was a Jewish prophet rejected and betrayed by his own people. I guess The Bible needs a politically correct make-over.
9
posted on
07/23/2003 6:31:38 AM PDT
by
PaulJ
To: Aquinasfan
The Jesus Seminar has been thouroughly debunked by serious theologians as well as historians, I reference the Christian Research Center.
I'm also reminded of the words of St. Paul who said that if Christ did not rise from the dead then Christians are the most unfortunate of all peoples (sorry for the paraphrase).
I think Mel's movie is important precisely as a stick in the eye to all these wishy-washy Christians that are comfortable w/ platitudes but uncomfortable w/ the idea of everlasting judgement. They don't want to see the reality of Christ's suffering because it will shatter their world of complacency.
10
posted on
07/23/2003 6:33:12 AM PDT
by
Pietro
To: Aquinasfan
It is crap... what a hatchet job... on Gibson, on this film, on Jesus, and on Christians.
11
posted on
07/23/2003 6:34:53 AM PDT
by
carton253
(You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
To: Aquinasfan
Whether or not Hutton Gibson is a crackpot I wouldn't know, but judging from this article, it appears that Alex Beam certainly is.
12
posted on
07/23/2003 6:35:31 AM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(Vote Democrat! Vote for national--and personal--suicide! It's like being a suicide bomber!)
To: Kwilliams
You beat me to it. Has any article ever before been written by someone as clueless?
13
posted on
07/23/2003 6:36:43 AM PDT
by
jammer
(Nasa knows why Columbia crashed. Now all they need to figure out is why they still exist)
To: jammer
How can such nonsensical drivel be published in a semi-national mainstream newspaper?
To: Aquinasfan
This writer is full of used food.I saw the trailer, and I would arguably say that the film has the potential of being one of the biggest Christian outreach vehicles in the history of contemporary media. The sheer power that is radiated from that short excerpt blows everything the televangelists are doing out of the water. TBN, Daystar, Sky Angel and The Word Network pale in comparison.
What I got from that was a true indication of the depth of the sacrifice that Our Lord made for us all.
Many people don't understand the sheer brutality of Ancient Rome. Many don't understand how Jesus bucked the established system among the Jews of the day. Many people don't understand the true ramifications of what happened 2,000 years ago. This film will change that for untold numbers of people.
In the larger scope of things, that fact alone will completely overshadow any notion of how much this film makes or does not make monitarily.
That so many people find fault with Gibson, simply for having the wherewithal to even attempt to tell this story, speaks volumes in terms of how powerful this message has the potential to be.
15
posted on
07/23/2003 6:39:14 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: Kwilliams
I don't know, but I can hear the squealing now from the likes of, say, The Boston Globe, if this sort of misinformation were published about any of the other religions, even including the worship of Isis.
16
posted on
07/23/2003 6:41:34 AM PDT
by
jammer
(Nasa knows why Columbia crashed. Now all they need to figure out is why they still exist)
To: Aquinasfan
"Whatever Gibson's intentions, the film will be perceived as anti-Semitic"
Could it be because of POS like this "reporter"?
Reporter's email is :
beam@globe.com
17
posted on
07/23/2003 6:42:19 AM PDT
by
steplock
(www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
To: PaulJ
I guess The Bible needs a politically correct make-over.
LOL...with Abe Foxman given final edit oversight authority.
18
posted on
07/23/2003 6:42:49 AM PDT
by
mr.pink
To: Kwilliams
He means the Bible is hate literature.
What?
19
posted on
07/23/2003 6:43:20 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: Aquinasfan; Dataman; Caleb1411
...the storied Jesus Seminar, whose members, mostly serious Biblical scholars from diverse fields, spent 10 years sorting out what ''really'' happened in the events described in the New TestamentOh, good heavens. "Storied," all right: the idea that the Jesus Seminar was in any sense an exercise in dispassionate, fact-oriented scholarship is quite a whopper of a story in itself.
See How to Make Your Very Own Jesus.
Dan
20
posted on
07/23/2003 6:45:31 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson