Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Announces Deployment of Troops to Protect U.S. Interests in Liberia
AP ^ | 7/21/03 | WILL LESTER

Posted on 07/21/2003 10:35:29 AM PDT by truthandlife

U.S. forces to protect the American embassy and U.S. interests in the war-torn west African nation of Liberia and would work with the United Nations to help restore a cease fire.

"We're concerned about our people," Bush said.

At the same time, Bush indicated that he had not yet made up his mind on the size of a U.S. force that might be sent to help peacekeepers from west African nations already in Liberia.

"We continue to monitor the situation very closely," Bush said during a joint news conference on his Texas ranch with Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi.

Bush spoke as heavy fighting engulfed the Liberian capital on Monrovia on Monday, killing at least 60 people in an all-out battle between rebels and forces of President Charles Taylor.

A shell hit an American diplomatic compound across the street from the U.S. embassy, where at least 10,000 refugees have taken refuge. Some 4,500 more American sailors and Marines have been ordered to position themselves closer to Liberia to be ready for possible duty in the embattled West African nation, U.S. officials in Washington said.

On another subject, Bush accused the governments of Syria and Iran of continuing to harbor terrorists.

"This behavior is completely unacceptable," Bush said. "States that continue to harbor terrorists will be held completely accountable."

Speaking through a translator, Berlusconi said he would return to Italy and Europe strengthened in his belief of the need to" develop the culture of union not nurture the culture of division" between the United States and Europe

"We need to revive the huge strength of cohesion," he said. "And this has to be a vital force, able to plan and build something. And this is the message which I'm going to bring back to my European allies as president of the European Union."

Bush also urged allies to act under U.N. authority to help rebuild Iraq. "The more people involved in Iraq the better off we will be," he said. "A free Iraq is a crucial part of winning the war on terror."

He thanked Berlusconi for Italy's support for the U.S.-led war in Iraq.

Bush called Berlusconi a "good friend and a strong ally."

"Defending freedom requires cost and sacrifice. The United States is grateful for Italy's willingness to bear the burdens with us," Bush said.

For his part, Berlusconi talked of the importance of healing the rift between the United States and many European nations that the war caused.

"We really need to support and develop a culture of union and cohesion and certainly not nurture the culture of division," he said. "Selfishness, narcissism and division shall never win."

Italy holds the current rotating presidency of the 15-nation European Union.

Bush reiterated his view that China, South Korea and other U.S. allies need to pressure North Korea to drop its nuclear ambitions and return to the negotiating table.

"I believe we can solve this issue diplomatically by encouraging the neighborhood ... to tell Kim Jong Il that a decision to develop a nuclear arsenal is one that will alienate you from the rest of the world," he said.

North Korea told U.S. officials in early July that it had completed reprocessing 8,000 reactor fuel rods, enough weapons-grade plutonium for about five or six nuclear bombs in addition to the one or two U.S. officials believe Pyongyang may already have.

On Iraq, Bush urged allies to act under U.N. authority to help rebuild the country. "The more people involved in Iraq the better off we will be," he said. "A free Iraq is a crucial part of winning the war on terror."

Bush and Berlusconi answered reporters' questions after giving their statements.

On the increasing violence in Liberia, Bush said, "We just sent a group of troops in to protect our interests. And we're concerned about our people in Liberia. We'll continue to monitor the situation very closely."

"We're working with the United Nations to affect policy necessary to get the cease-fire back in place," he added.

He said his administration was also working with a bloc of West African nations that is preparing to send peacekeepers into Liberia.

Bush reiterated his earlier promise to contribute peacekeeping troops to the operation. But, as in the past, he did not specify how large a force the United States would commit.

Berlusconi's visit to the ranch on Sunday and Monday gave the president a chance to show the world that not all Europe is cool to his policies, and that trans-Atlantic relations remain strong even though France and Germany didn't back the war effort.

For Berlusconi, the stay was a reward from Bush for joining with Britain and Spain in support of the war.

The two leaders talked about stopping the spread of nuclear arms, achieving peace in the Middle East, fighting terror and mending fissures in U.S.-European ties.

Berlusconi is among the few world leaders to be invited both to Bush's ranch and to the presidential retreat at Camp David, Md.

Others included Iraq war allies British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 26thmeu; africa; bush; deployed; liberia; marines; troopmovement; troops; us; usembassy; ussiwojimalhd7
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 07/21/2003 10:35:30 AM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthandlife; PhiKapMom
A rather explosive headline for what the article actually states.
2 posted on 07/21/2003 10:40:22 AM PDT by onyx (Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
U.S. Interests in Liberia ???
 
I can see where it would be in our best interests to bring stability to the brutality, savagery, and misery markets.

Owl_Eagle

”Guns Before Butter.”

3 posted on 07/21/2003 10:40:30 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel ("Europeans lost the will to live the moral life long ago." - Ben Shapiro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
If this starts becoming another Iraq situation, I am going to begin to worry about 2004.
4 posted on 07/21/2003 10:44:47 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ( "There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
1) We will never bring an end to the "brutality, savagery, and misery" to this continent.

2) I don't see Liberians marching to our borders, ready to attack our homes... nor do I see them as terrorists ready to carry out dirty deeds upon our airliners, or country.

3) There are lots of places where we can do good by sending in our troops... like the U.S. southern border with Mexico, or the northern border with Canada.

4) As for Berlusconi: Drink Italian wine... not French!

Hoppy
5 posted on 07/21/2003 10:48:13 AM PDT by Hop A Long Cassidy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
Despite our being pulled into this conflict,and urged on by the Dems,....

should anything go wrong, the Dems will just add this to the pile with which they hope to discredit Bush.

Hillary will gladly vote for our intervention, hoping to cause an overload, so she can victoriously step up to the mikes at the Dem convention next summer...........
6 posted on 07/21/2003 10:48:28 AM PDT by spoiler2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
I believe its the embassy that is of interest.
7 posted on 07/21/2003 10:49:11 AM PDT by smith288 (Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
You mean Bush could be in trouble with another tremendous victory? Oh, the price of catastrophic success.
8 posted on 07/21/2003 10:49:22 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spoiler2
If we DO go in we better go in with guns, not flowers. And we'd better be ready to shoot-to-kill. But I think we really, really need to stay out.
9 posted on 07/21/2003 10:53:32 AM PDT by johnb838 (Understand the root causes of American Anger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Time for the US to get our diplomats and Americans out of there.

After that, time to go home. We do not have any strategic US interest in Liberia. Liberia has not attacked us. Liberia hasn't funded Al Qaieda(sp). Libertia hasn't threatened to nuke us.

We can not be the world's cop. I opposed this under Bush I. I opposed it under Klinton. I will oppose it under GHWB as well.

We also still have the Iraq situation as well. Let's put that fire out before starting another.

Besdies, we can't afford this financially.

10 posted on 07/21/2003 11:03:53 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Something is very wrong here. I'm getting whiplash.
11 posted on 07/21/2003 11:05:16 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Liberia hasn't funded Al Qaieda(sp)

Key word: YET.

Go home, and al-Qaeda's likely to move in. They've targeted Central Africa for years.

12 posted on 07/21/2003 11:05:28 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
I am a little confused. We support Pakistan and it's government who we know are corrupt just because it is helping us to capture terrorists, we support Saudi Arabia, even though we know they are pro-terrorist, just because they supposedly are stopping more terrorists. Yet we try and oust Liberia's dictator so that the Muslim Terrorists(Rebels as AP likes to say) can come in and take over the country and more then likely get another base of operations for al-quiada. Does anyone else see the two-faced position on this?
13 posted on 07/21/2003 11:16:35 AM PDT by JustAnAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Liberia is rich in oil. There is an interest there...believe me...and NO I am not borrowing this from the leftist arguments and Bush. I am a Bush supporter through and through. I just know it is factual that there is an oil interest in Liberia and that plays a role here.
14 posted on 07/21/2003 11:20:37 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache (Which one will lose? Depends on what I choose or maybe which voice...I ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Evacuate our diplomats and citizens from Liberia and stay the hell out afterwards.

I'm worried about becoming bogged down in yet another country, especially one that is not of vital interest to the United States, like Liberia.

15 posted on 07/21/2003 11:21:47 AM PDT by Sparta (Check out my new blog, http://bayousage.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
What if they do move into Liberia? Could they cause much more terror than there is already? If they wish to expend their resources there, they won't be expending them here.
16 posted on 07/21/2003 11:21:58 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Define victory in Liberia. Also, do you really think one to two American soldiers dying a day in Iraq is a victory? We just acknowledged that the war has shifted phases and is now a low-intensity guerilla war.

BTW: I supported Operation Iraqi Freedom and I support our continued presence in Iraq.

17 posted on 07/21/2003 11:23:50 AM PDT by Sparta (Check out my new blog, http://bayousage.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
1) Liberia is in West Africa

2) Why would they want that pissant country?

3) There's not much of an Islamic militant presence in the region, outside of Nigeria.

18 posted on 07/21/2003 11:25:36 AM PDT by Sparta (Check out my new blog, http://bayousage.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
1) Liberia is in West Africa

Duly noted. It's still in the region coveted by al-Qaeda.

2) Why would they want that pissant country?

Why'd they want Afghanistan? Answer that question, and you'll answer your own.

3) There's not much of an Islamic militant presence in the region, outside of Nigeria.

Nigeria's got too much government for al-Qaeda's taste.

19 posted on 07/21/2003 11:31:27 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: meenie
What if they do move into Liberia?

Then they have a new base.

Could they cause much more terror than there is already?

They didn't cause much terror in Afghanistan.

20 posted on 07/21/2003 11:32:38 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson