Cut to: Andrew Gilligan, the BBCs man in downtown Baghdad. "Im in the center of Baghdad," said a very dubious Gilligan, "and I dont see anything But then the Americans have a history of making these premature announcements." Gilligan was referring to a military communiqué from Qatar the day before saying the Americans had taken control of most of Baghdads airport. When that happened, Gilligan had told World Service listeners that he was there, at the airport - but the Americans werent. Gilligan inferred that the Americans were lying. An hour or two later, a different BBC correspondent pointed out that Gilligan wasnt at the airport, actually. He was nearby - but apparently far enough away that the other correspondent felt it necessary to mention that he didnt really know if Gilligan was around, but that no matter what Gilligan had seen or not seen, the airport was firmly and obviously in American hands.
It was important to the BBC that Gilligan not be wrong twice in two days. Whatever the truth was, the BBC, like Walter Durantys New York Times, must never say, "I was wrong." So, despite the fact that the appearance of American troops in Baghdad was surely one of the wars big moments, and one the BBC had obviously missed, American veracity became the story of the day. Gilligan, joined by his colleagues in Baghdad, Paul Wood and Rageh Omaar, kept insisting that not only had the Americans not gone to the "center" - which they reckoned to be where they were - they hadnt really been in the capital at all. Both Omaar and Wood told listeners that they had been on hour-long Iraqi Ministry of Information bus rides - "and," said Wood, "we were free to go anywhere" -yet they had seen nothing of an American presence in the city. From Qatar, a BBC correspondent helpfully explained that US briefings, such as that announcing the Baghdad incursion, were meaningless exercises, "more PR than anything else." Maybe, implied the World Service, the Americans had made it all up: all day long, Wood repeatedly reported that there was no evidence to support the American claim.
Why people are taking this guy's word on anything is beyond me.