Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/18/2003 6:22:15 PM PDT by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Brian S
Too incredible for words. I will eagerly await the opinions of others here.
2 posted on 07/18/2003 6:25:16 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Does anybody know how he died yet?

Fingerprint the entire Beeb!
3 posted on 07/18/2003 6:25:20 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

I'M BACK!!!

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD (It's in the Breaking News sidebar!)

4 posted on 07/18/2003 6:25:28 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S; Miss Marple; Howlin
For a take on Gilligan's work, click here and do a keyword search on his last name. But here's the best bit:

Cut to: Andrew Gilligan, the BBC’s man in downtown Baghdad. "I’m in the center of Baghdad," said a very dubious Gilligan, "and I don’t see anything…But then the Americans have a history of making these premature announcements." Gilligan was referring to a military communiqué from Qatar the day before saying the Americans had taken control of most of Baghdad’s airport. When that happened, Gilligan had told World Service listeners that he was there, at the airport - but the Americans weren’t. Gilligan inferred that the Americans were lying. An hour or two later, a different BBC correspondent pointed out that Gilligan wasn’t at the airport, actually. He was nearby - but apparently far enough away that the other correspondent felt it necessary to mention that he didn’t really know if Gilligan was around, but that no matter what Gilligan had seen or not seen, the airport was firmly and obviously in American hands.

It was important to the BBC that Gilligan not be wrong twice in two days. Whatever the truth was, the BBC, like Walter Duranty’s New York Times, must never say, "I was wrong." So, despite the fact that the appearance of American troops in Baghdad was surely one of the war’s big moments, and one the BBC had obviously missed, American veracity became the story of the day. Gilligan, joined by his colleagues in Baghdad, Paul Wood and Rageh Omaar, kept insisting that not only had the Americans not gone to the "center" - which they reckoned to be where they were - they hadn’t really been in the capital at all. Both Omaar and Wood told listeners that they had been on hour-long Iraqi Ministry of Information bus rides - "and," said Wood, "we were free to go anywhere" -yet they had seen nothing of an American presence in the city. From Qatar, a BBC correspondent helpfully explained that US briefings, such as that announcing the Baghdad incursion, were meaningless exercises, "more PR than anything else." Maybe, implied the World Service, the Americans had made it all up: all day long, Wood repeatedly reported that there was no evidence to support the American claim.

Why people are taking this guy's word on anything is beyond me.

6 posted on 07/18/2003 6:33:20 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Has Bill Clinton, James Carivelle, or any of their ilk been spotted in England in the last couple of days? I know BJ BJ was there recently. This sure sounds like an Arkanicide.
11 posted on 07/18/2003 6:54:30 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson