To: Willie Green
This title is so funny!!!!!!!!!
2 posted on
07/17/2003 3:24:18 PM PDT by
Dog
To: Willie Green
Pseudo-science ALERT! I smell a "false advertising" claim about to be lodged
To: All
|
These Guys Don't Want You To Donate!
|
|
Tick them off! Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
4 posted on
07/17/2003 3:26:31 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Willie Green; aculeus; general_re; tet68; BlueLancer; jjbrouwer; hellinahandcart
6 posted on
07/17/2003 3:29:08 PM PDT by
dighton
(NLC™)
To: null and void
A hundred years ago they would have called the "Dockers with Radioactivity"
oh, Nanotech PING
So9
To: Willie Green
The important thing here is that nanotechnology has finally ended those embarrassing moments when men have wet spots on the crotch of their pants. Finally, we can throw away our "peney pads".
8 posted on
07/17/2003 3:30:31 PM PDT by
w_over_w
To: Willie Green
She should count her blessing that she got a customer service rep that could actually read and speak English. I have not always been so lucky.
9 posted on
07/17/2003 3:32:16 PM PDT by
LisaAnne
To: Willie Green
Just think off all the fun we would have missed out on if Monica's dress was made from the same stuff as these Go Khakis.
In her case , would they be called <um Khakis?
16 posted on
07/17/2003 4:15:35 PM PDT by
Cheapskate
(Freedom,use it or lose it)
To: Willie Green
She must have graduated from the Michael Moore school of journalism: put people on the spot and write down what they say word for word. All she had to do was do a google search and look
here to find out about Dockers' use of nanotech (but she wasn't interested in that, she was interested in doing a hit piece).
Apparently the mechanism to defend the pants against stains is that extremely small "nano-whiskers" are used to cover the threads, and these block liquids from getting in and staining them. I assume the production of nanofibers is not easy. Anything that uses nanofibers can thus reasonably claim to be using "nanotechnology," just as anything using chemicals can claim to be using "chemistry." As in, "better living through chemistry," a slogan that applies to a lot of things. Why should "nanotechnology" refer specifically and solely to nanorobots?
19 posted on
07/17/2003 4:58:50 PM PDT by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: All
23 posted on
07/17/2003 7:16:47 PM PDT by
Bob J
(Freerepublic.net...where it's always a happening....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
