Skip to comments.
Rats: It is time to nominate an openly gay person to SCOTUS
C-SPAN
| July 15, 2003
| nwrep
Posted on 07/15/2003 9:45:28 PM PDT by nwrep
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
1
posted on
07/15/2003 9:45:29 PM PDT
by
nwrep
To: *Homosexual Agenda
Ping
2
posted on
07/15/2003 9:45:53 PM PDT
by
nwrep
To: nwrep
They also said they would nominate a 'transgendered' person. Whatever that means. Someone so confused about which bathroom to use would seem to fit in perfectly on this court.
3
posted on
07/15/2003 9:46:44 PM PDT
by
Those_Crazy_Liberals
(Ronaldus Magnus he's our man . . . If he can't do it, no one can.)
To: nwrep
All 9 Dem Presidential candidates today said they would nominate an openly gay person to the SCOTUS. How the hell can 1% of the population have so much freakin POWER ??
4
posted on
07/15/2003 9:47:33 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
To: nwrep
Why should they want to push for a gay on the court when they already have the people there who vote their way?
5
posted on
07/15/2003 9:49:14 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
To: All
6
posted on
07/15/2003 9:49:41 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: nwrep
All the more reason to deny the Dems the White House from here to eternity.
To: nwrep
All right, say our "openly gay person" isn't sold on Roe v. Wade. What then?
8
posted on
07/15/2003 9:49:56 PM PDT
by
dighton
(NLC™)
To: nwrep
This country is going the way of Rome and I'm planning my getaway.
To: nwrep
THESE PEOPLE ARE ALL A BUNCH OF PANDERING IDIOTS WHO DO NOT HAVE THE BRAINS OR INTEGRITY TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT!
/Rant off
10
posted on
07/15/2003 9:52:36 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(The left have blood on their hands.)
To: Those_Crazy_Liberals
Don't they all wear the same black robe? so how can they tell?
To: dighton
There's a research project. Are there any openly-pro-life-openly-gay jurists, or other gay jurists with a conservative view or two? Try floating their names (if they exist) before these lying democratic candidates.
To: nwrep
I thought we were against litmus tests and profiling.
The rules just keep changing.
To: Fred Mertz
This country is going the way of Rome and I'm planning my getaway.....to where??????
14
posted on
07/15/2003 9:55:18 PM PDT
by
GrandMoM
("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
To: nwrep
Would the candidate have to prove he or she was homosexual before a senate committee, huh?
15
posted on
07/15/2003 9:55:29 PM PDT
by
Rudder
To: ladyinred
Is Hillary setting up these nine morons? Could she be planning to put them out on the limb and saw them off with their weird ideas? Could she then come along and say that all the nine idiots are too liberal for America and run in the Center?
16
posted on
07/15/2003 9:55:58 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: Dr Warmoose
Litmus test and profiling only apply to Republicans running for President!
17
posted on
07/15/2003 9:56:40 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: Fred Mertz
Read "The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire" I am afraid you are not far off.
18
posted on
07/15/2003 9:56:45 PM PDT
by
redangus
To: dighton
Oddly enough, homosexuals are notoriously pro-abortion. Just comes with the territory of being against nature, I guess.
Another weird thing - judges in the State of California are allowed to be members of the Boy Scouts of America (there was some court deal about it, the homo-promoters wanted judges who were BSA members kicked out), BUT if any court decision comes up involving homosexuality, the BSA member judges have to excuse themselves.
FUBAR.
To: Those_Crazy_Liberals
They also said they would nominate a 'transgendered' person. Whatever that means.It means that they want a person who is so sound in mind that they woke up one day and figured it was a great idea to spend huge money to mutiliate their genitals and spend the rest of their lives shooting up hormones and wearing their sister's clothes.
Just what I want to see behind the bench, some frizzy haired, fake boobed, "thing" with a five o'clock shadow and a smoker's voice.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson