1 posted on
07/15/2003 9:45:29 PM PDT by
nwrep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: *Homosexual Agenda
Ping
2 posted on
07/15/2003 9:45:53 PM PDT by
nwrep
To: nwrep
They also said they would nominate a 'transgendered' person. Whatever that means. Someone so confused about which bathroom to use would seem to fit in perfectly on this court.
3 posted on
07/15/2003 9:46:44 PM PDT by
Those_Crazy_Liberals
(Ronaldus Magnus he's our man . . . If he can't do it, no one can.)
To: nwrep
All 9 Dem Presidential candidates today said they would nominate an openly gay person to the SCOTUS. How the hell can 1% of the population have so much freakin POWER ??
4 posted on
07/15/2003 9:47:33 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
To: nwrep
Why should they want to push for a gay on the court when they already have the people there who vote their way?
5 posted on
07/15/2003 9:49:14 PM PDT by
Slyfox
To: All
6 posted on
07/15/2003 9:49:41 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: nwrep
All the more reason to deny the Dems the White House from here to eternity.
To: nwrep
All right, say our "openly gay person" isn't sold on Roe v. Wade. What then?
8 posted on
07/15/2003 9:49:56 PM PDT by
dighton
(NLC™)
To: nwrep
This country is going the way of Rome and I'm planning my getaway.
To: nwrep
THESE PEOPLE ARE ALL A BUNCH OF PANDERING IDIOTS WHO DO NOT HAVE THE BRAINS OR INTEGRITY TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT!
/Rant off
10 posted on
07/15/2003 9:52:36 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(The left have blood on their hands.)
To: nwrep
I thought we were against litmus tests and profiling.
The rules just keep changing.
To: nwrep
Would the candidate have to prove he or she was homosexual before a senate committee, huh?
15 posted on
07/15/2003 9:55:29 PM PDT by
Rudder
To: nwrep
If the gay is a right winger like Clarence Thomas, I'd back him. All I care about is the rulings.
22 posted on
07/15/2003 9:59:14 PM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana)
To: nwrep
I think it's time to nominate an openly conservative person to SCOTUS.
To: nwrep
I think that's already been done with Souter. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
24 posted on
07/15/2003 10:00:58 PM PDT by
BCrago66
To: nwrep
I would support an openly gay justice on the Supreme Court, so long as he interpreted the constitution according to what it actually says, could separate questions of constitutional law from his private life, and was as qualified as any other nominee with a similar judicial philosophy. Of course, he wouldn't be "gay enough" for those on the left, much as Thomas isn't "black enough" for their liking.
28 posted on
07/15/2003 10:03:56 PM PDT by
egomeimihi
(current law student at Seattle U)
To: nwrep
The solution's simple: "out" Souter.
To: nwrep
Bush could outflank them and nominate
Al Rantel, but I'm pretty sure he's not a lawyer. Politics are right though.
30 posted on
07/15/2003 10:17:01 PM PDT by
TheAngryClam
(Bill Simon's recall campaign slogan- "If I can't have it, no one can!")
To: nwrep
What type are they looking for? Latent, festive, or 100% flamming?
31 posted on
07/15/2003 10:20:02 PM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
To: nwrep
What if it was an openly gay, but otherwise rigidly Conservative* candidate? Would the Dims want to nominate him/her then?
*strange as it may seem, to some, such folks do exist. I have known a few. Very few, yes, but a few.
35 posted on
07/15/2003 10:50:18 PM PDT by
King Prout
(people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
To: nwrep
Okay, the dems fell to a new low... next, gay marriage.
43 posted on
07/15/2003 11:18:34 PM PDT by
Porterville
(J Marshall asserted the Court's monopoly on the interpretation of the Constitution, may he burn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
