Skip to comments.
UN VOTE TODAY !
15 July 30
Posted on 07/15/2003 11:41:11 AM PDT by Suck My AR-16
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-212 last
To: Catspaw
Do you consider Tom DeLay a liberal?
No. How much farther are you going to stray off the subject?
201
posted on
07/16/2003 10:15:20 AM PDT
by
wasp69
(The time has come.......)
To: wasp69
You asked me who I thought was ideal.
Tom DeLay comes closest. He's also a very effective legislator.
202
posted on
07/16/2003 10:18:21 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Catspaw
You asked me who I thought was ideal.
No I didn't.
203
posted on
07/16/2003 10:22:00 AM PDT
by
wasp69
(The time has come.......)
To: wasp69
Did you stomp your little foot & shake your head when you responded to me?
204
posted on
07/16/2003 10:24:00 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Catspaw
Did you stomp your little foot & shake your head when you responded to me?
No. Maybe you can post something substantive to refute me; or maybe you can try and change the subject again.
205
posted on
07/16/2003 10:27:58 AM PDT
by
wasp69
(The time has come.......)
To: wasp69
Naw, not gonna bother. All you'll do is close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears and hum loudly.
206
posted on
07/16/2003 10:33:22 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: wasp69; Catspaw
No. Maybe you can post something substantive to refute me; or maybe you can try and change the subject again.In fairness, I was the one who asked for Catspaw's ideal congressman.
Catspaw-I agree with you that DeLay is a good man, and I agree with most of his policy. Good choice. FWIW, he voted aye on Pauls bill. :-)
207
posted on
07/16/2003 10:34:43 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
To: jmc813
I said "the closest." I didn't say he was the ideal. I pointed out earlier that there is no ideal because one cannot achieve perfection. His stance on Israel is his strong selling point to me.
208
posted on
07/16/2003 10:36:12 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Catspaw
Naw, not gonna bother.
Didn't think so.
All you'll do is close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears and hum loudly.
Naw, I'll leave that up to you. If you can't support your position against presented fact, that may be your only option.
209
posted on
07/16/2003 10:42:52 AM PDT
by
wasp69
(The time has come.......)
To: Mr. Mojo
Just like Campaign Finance, the libs 'allege' they want. Thing is they just don't want it to apply to them!
210
posted on
07/16/2003 1:38:33 PM PDT
by
JustPiper
(Am I going or are you coming? Socialist Democratic = Commie!)
To: Spiff
This will never pass...not until the UN does something really evil like try to enforce a gun confiscation resolution with UN Peacekeepers...and then, it'll be too late.
211
posted on
07/16/2003 5:11:59 PM PDT
by
ExSoldier
(M1911A1: The ORIGINAL "Point and Click" interface!)
To: ExSoldier
We got the UN Peacekeeping U.S. dues reduced to 22%, now congress wants to bump it to 27.1%
Story > http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/947349/posts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-212 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson