To: nmh
Gcruse, are you gay?
Good lord, no. Do I have to be gay to defend human rights?
I am also against the war on drugs. Does that mean I am a
doper? I am not. I am pro-choice, and can't even get pregnant.
27 posted on
07/15/2003 11:07:09 AM PDT by
gcruse
(There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
To: gcruse
I'm glad you aren't ... however just because it is a lifestyle choice doesn't mean it is the RIGHT one. The same is true about abortion, drug use, illegal or addictive perscription drugs etc... is it the RIGHT choice?
39 posted on
07/15/2003 11:13:57 AM PDT by
nmh
To: gcruse
Do I have to be gay to defend human rights? Interesting question! Now homosexuality is a human right??? {And, some still don't believe the homosexuals have an agenda.} Posturing oneself as a defender of "human rights" is the number one sympathy acquisition tool in the liberal handbook. Find a new angle SPARKY!
The One who defines true human rights emphatically states in His Word, The Bible, that homosexuality is sin like adultery, lying, murder, stealing, etc. His Truth withstands the test of time; so, I don't anticipate any lasting, positive ramifications from today's homosexual acceptance movement.
The US has been skating on very thin ice since ROE v Wade, and I know God will not tolerate this genocide forever. If this nation adds to this atrocity by officially endorsing perversion (homosexuality included), then we are shaking our other fist in His face and demanding an immediate reckoning.
65 posted on
07/15/2003 11:46:27 AM PDT by
caprock
To: gcruse; nmh
Gcruse, are you gay? hey, this looks familiar...
absolutely irrelevant and a cheap shot, but familiar.
Trace
89 posted on
07/15/2003 12:17:46 PM PDT by
Trace21230
(Ideal MOAB test site: Paris)
To: gcruse
You are pro homosexual, pro drugs and pro abortion, are you sure you are on the right forum?
To: gcruse
So what about Bi-Sexuals? do you think they should have the same rights as Gay people?
Men and Women should have the same human rights and for the most part do. But that does not give them a free ticket to exhibit any type of behaviour they feel like.
Not to be blunt but no matter if your a man or woman having rectal sex is physically unhealthy and can cause numerous diseases and infections which was reported in the Havard Medical Journal.
214 posted on
07/15/2003 10:02:02 PM PDT by
missyme
To: gcruse
Your pro-choice when it comes to a gay agenda but not pro-choice when it comes to a Christian agenda.
To say if you don't want to be gay, then by all means stay heterosexual is disingenuous. One could say if you don't want to be a child molester then by all means sleep with adults. Do you see the problem with that argument?
In spite of your Randian tagline, the fact is, no one is an island. What we do DOES affect other people. Those of us who recognize the importance of culture and society, would prefer to live in a Christian rather than a degenerate society. I have children to raise and I would prefer if sexuality were NOT a matter of public discourse. The line about the privacy of the bedroom is the most Hypocritical: when you suggest they KEEP it in the bedroom(rather than on parade or in schools) the gay and lesbian crowd accuse you of trying to put them back in the closet. Their concern is for public approval, not private pleasure.
I am unaware of any laws that prevent them from housing or employment or anything else that usurps their right to property. They are looking for special rights, in order to be a protected class. Persons holding to a biblical faith are in process of being made second class citizens in this country.
230 posted on
07/16/2003 11:22:24 AM PDT by
TradicalRC
(Fides quaerens intellectum.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson