Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TWA Flight 800: By the numbers
WND ^ | July 15, 2003 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 07/14/2003 10:30:33 PM PDT by Nachum

Editor's note: This week marks the seventh anniversary of the downing of TWA Flight 800. Author Jack Cashill, whose book with James Sanders, "First Strike," presents a compelling case for terrorist involvement in the tragedy, today presents an index of facts surrounding the event and its aftermath. © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

7
Come July 17, the number of years this crime has gone unsolved.

270
The number of eyewitnesses that the FBI admitted saw what appeared to be ascending streaks of light.

34
The number of eyewitnesses interviewed by analysts from the Defense Intelligence Agency's Missile and Space Intelligence Center whose descriptions "were very consistent with the characteristics of the flight of [surface to air] missiles."

1
The number of eyewitnesses the New York Times interviewed.

0
The number of eyewitnesses that the New York Times interviewed who had seen an ascending streak.

1
The number of witnesses, according to the CIA, who saw the crippled and ascending TWA 800 that merely looked like a missile ("the man on the bridge").

1
The number of interviews the CIA fully fabricated ("the man on the bridge").

3,200
The number of feet the CIA claimed the noseless plane climbed.

1,700
The number of feet the NTSB claimed the noseless plane climbed.

750
Of the roughly 750 total FBI eyewitnesses the number who did not see the noseless plane climb at all, including other airline pilots.

12
"Or less." The number of total eyewitnesses that, a year later, the New York Times was reporting had seen the crash.

0
The number of Freedom of Information Act requests to which the NTSB has responded to show its climb calculations.

0
The number of ships or subs the Navy claimed were within 185 miles of the disaster.

4
The number of Navy ships or subs the FBI, in its final report, admitted were in "the immediate vicinity" of the disaster.

7
The number of days it allegedly took the Navy to find the black boxes in 130 feet of calm water off the Hamptons.

7
The number of hours it actually took the Navy to find the black boxes of a crashed Turkish airplane in 7,200 feet of water earlier in that year off the Dominican Republic.

4
The number of seconds missing at the end of both the cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder.

3
The number of satellites in position to record the disaster.

3
The number of satellites reportedly broken at that very moment.

0
The number of times the New York Times used the word "military" or "satellite" in the first two months of reporting on TWA 800.

5
The number of minutes it took the Department of Defense to alert Russia that one of our satellites had spotted a Ukranian missile accidentally downing one of its aircraft in October 2001.

5
The number of different official explanations authorities gave for what the FAA radar technicians had seen "merge" with TWA Flight 800 on the night of July 17.

116
The number of pieces of "suspicious" debris, many of which had tested positive for explosive residue in Long Island, that were sent to the notorious FBI lab in Washington.

116
The number of pieces of suspicious debris that were never heard of again.

150
Roughly the number of airline pilots I have communicated with since the book came out.

3
The number who believed that mechanical failure had destroyed the airplane.

200
The number of (local) TV and radio interviews I have done since the book came out.

190
The number of interviewers who were largely or completely supportive.

100
The number, roughly, that had actually read the book.

27
The number of mainstream media reporters and producers I have talked to since the book came out.

1
The number who were largely or completely supportive.

1
The number who had read the book.

3
The number who said, "Clinton would never do anything like that."

3
The number of pages Michael Isikoff of Newsweek volunteered to read.

3
The number of whistleblowers arrested for trying to undo the cover-up.

2
The book's highest spike on Amazon.com.

0
The number of mainstream articles, reviews or interviews on the book.

2
The number of times Sen. John Kerry referred to the destruction of TWA 800 as a terrorist act on national TV.

0
The number of references to TWA Flight 800 in the Senate Select Committee on Intelligent Report in 1996 and 1997, on which committee Kerry sat.

230
The number of good souls whose memories deserve much better than seven years of deceit.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Order Cashill's stunning book, "First Strike: TWA Flight 800 and the Attack on America" -- now on a special sale -- at ShopNetDaily.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1000tinfoilposts; 800; by; flight; numbers; the; twa; twa800; twa800list
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2003 10:30:33 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Great post. Thank you.
2 posted on 07/14/2003 10:33:20 PM PDT by AGreatPer (Current odds on Hillary running in 04......4-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
A Recall AND a Fundraiser? I'm toast.
Let's get this over with FAST. Please contribute!

3 posted on 07/14/2003 10:33:35 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I'll always remember right after 9/11, Stephanopolus talking to Jennings referred to it as the "bombing of TWA Flight 800". This ain't proof positive but I really believe he let the truth slip out.
4 posted on 07/14/2003 10:34:05 PM PDT by beaversmom (Celebrating May 5th and all days with an American Flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Anyone read Jack Cashill's book on the subject? Does it make a good case? Sounds like it might be an interesting read.
5 posted on 07/14/2003 10:36:55 PM PDT by beaversmom (Celebrating May 5th and all days with an American Flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *TWA800_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
6 posted on 07/14/2003 10:39:37 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
1 The number of interviews the CIA fully fabricated ("the man on the bridge"). 3,200 The number of feet the CIA claimed the noseless plane climbed.

This is the same CIA that rejected Czech intel's information on Atta's meeting in Prague, and the same CIA that is throwing mud on British intel's report on Niger. Where is McCarthy when you need him?

7 posted on 07/14/2003 10:45:15 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Thanks for posting this article. I wonder how much our gov'ts refusal to tell the truth about TWA 800 and OKC encouraged OBL and his ilk.
8 posted on 07/14/2003 10:50:04 PM PDT by gracex7 (The LORD is not slack concerning His promise....but is longsuffering to us-ward. 2 Peter 3:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
bump
9 posted on 07/14/2003 11:21:49 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I read the book, It was incredible and credible at the same time. Also, interestingly, I am reading Dick Morris's new book and he starts counting off the terrorist attacks leading to 911 that happened under Clinton that he did nothing about, and guess what he names? TWA flight 800.
10 posted on 07/14/2003 11:25:34 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
Anyone read Jack Cashill's book on the subject? Does it make a good case? Sounds like it might be an interesting read.

I did, and it is a very good read. Convincing, and completely believable. It only makes sense that the government would not want the public to know the truth if TWA 800 was shot down by terrorists or accidently by the military. If terrorism, no one would want to fly and our society would be crippled. If it was the military by accident, how could they admit it?

11 posted on 07/14/2003 11:35:25 PM PDT by ALASKA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Nachum
And on November 12, 2001 an air liner went down shortly after take off in New York, and the same crowd is telling us it was caused by turbulence.
13 posted on 07/15/2003 1:34:51 AM PDT by StACase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StACase
Flight 587? ... I never bought the official story on that one ... just a little too close to 9/11 and in New York ...
14 posted on 07/15/2003 2:09:01 AM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bobby777
New York, 9/11, the subsequent discovery of the shoe bomber, the previous AQ experiments with small improvised explosives on planes, the UNGA in town, Dubya in town, witnesses claiming to have seen fire/explosions on board, etc.

Plus this: The plane lost both engines and the vertical stablizer. Which is more likely: a) The vertical stabilizer falls off and the plane falls like a brick; or b) An explosion severs hydraulics (it was not a FBW frogbus, but an older model) the plane gets sideways at 350kts, and big surfaces get ripped off?
15 posted on 07/15/2003 3:31:50 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
you forgot-

1 The number of video tapes of a streak rising upwards and then an explosion (this 'coctail party' video was shown on national TV)

1 number of people (including myself) who I personally know to have seen this video on TV

0 number stations owning up to showing such this video

16 posted on 07/15/2003 4:42:46 AM PDT by Mr. K (mwk_14059 on yahoo Instant Messenger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Hillary Clinton, during one of her recent rants, was complaining about the lack of funding for additional security to fight terrorists. Among other things, she mentioned the need for additional security to prevent a terrorist from using a shoulder-held rocket launcher to take down an airliner. This little lady is on the ball, folks!
17 posted on 07/15/2003 5:38:12 AM PDT by Maria S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Bump
18 posted on 07/15/2003 5:48:35 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StACase
Turbulence, old engine, bird strike, cheese, moose, and excessive showering were all leaked as "causes."
19 posted on 07/15/2003 5:50:12 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FoxFang
Unless you are being sarcastic, nope.

Nobody "claimed" 9/11, or the '93 WTC bombing.
20 posted on 07/15/2003 5:52:00 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson