Skip to comments.
THAT URANIUM STORY
NRO ^
| 7/14/2003
| David Frum
Posted on 07/14/2003 8:59:22 PM PDT by Utah Girl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 781-790 next last
To: Jim Robinson
I see it as the price we pay to end terrorism and to end the abortionist/homosexualist/gungrabbing liberal activist judiciary.There's no such thing as a free lunch.
21
posted on
07/15/2003 4:06:11 AM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Jim Robinson
I see it as the price we pay to end terrorism and to end the abortionist/homosexualist/gungrabbing liberal activist judiciary. He extended the assault weapons ban, and you didn't utter a peep.
He nationalized airport workers to collect toenail clippers, and not a sound was heard.
He expanded the federal Department of Education, and you continued to cheer.
He pushed for and got, yet another federal giveaway program in prescription drugs for seniors.
And you want this guy to pick justices.
Go figure.
22
posted on
07/15/2003 4:06:28 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: OWK
I've got a feeling that if we had FR when Ronald Reagan was in office, some of you guys would've been campaigning against him and some of his "socialist" policies and run away spending too. No one took him serious about defeating the communists. Well, thank God there were not so many short-sighted, weak kneed cowards around in those days as we seem to have today.
23
posted on
07/15/2003 4:08:26 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
To: OWK
Well, who cares. The prize is much bigger than all of that rolled together and multiplied many times over. Ending the liberal activist judiciary is priceless.
24
posted on
07/15/2003 4:09:59 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
To: OWK
Who would you rather have picking the judges?
25
posted on
07/15/2003 4:11:07 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
To: OWK
He extended the assault weapons ban,...No he didn't.
26
posted on
07/15/2003 4:13:14 AM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Jim Robinson
I've got a feeling that if we had FR when Ronald Reagan was in office, some of you guys would've been campaigning against him and some of his "socialist" policies and run away spending too. Yeah you've got all kinds of "feelings".
And a long supply of excuses.
And a habit of changing the subject.
The fact is the the republicans are behaving just like the democrats you claim to despise.
But because they're republicans, you don't say a word, and you ridicule those who do.
Rationalizing and excuse mongering seem to be the order of the day.
"They had to, because...."
"Well if they just take care of this, then I don't care about that...."
With each passing excuse, and with every rationalization, the bonds on our children's future become tighter and tighter.
And you helped.
27
posted on
07/15/2003 4:14:15 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: OWK
No excuses. The prize is worth the price.
28
posted on
07/15/2003 4:15:14 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
To: Jim Robinson
Ending the liberal activist judiciary is priceless. yeah, that's gonna happen.
His track record as a conservative is so dependable after all.
29
posted on
07/15/2003 4:15:26 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: OWK
It's going to happen.
30
posted on
07/15/2003 4:16:25 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
To: Jim Robinson
The prize is worth the price. The price is further advancement of socialism, and a bleak future for our children.
Not only is it an unacceptable price... but an unnecessary one.
All of your rationalizations are based on the assertion that we somehow NEED to do these things.
That they are political necessity.
That's nonsense.
31
posted on
07/15/2003 4:17:58 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: Jim Robinson
It's going to happen. GOP Lucy will yank the football out from under conservative Charlie Brown... yet again...
And everyone will see it... yet again.
And they will know it for what it is... yet again.
And yet others will still excuse it.
32
posted on
07/15/2003 4:19:44 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: Jim Robinson
Do you ever sleep?
33
posted on
07/15/2003 4:20:14 AM PDT
by
Rebelbase
(........The bartender yells, "hey get out of here, we don't serve breakfast!")
To: .30Carbine
Am I ever on time to work?
To: OWK
The price is doing whatever he has to do to get reelected and to increase the majority in both houses of Congress. And I could care less what that price is. How can you measure the price of ending the scourge of terrorism? How can you measure the price of killing millions of the unborn through government sanctione abortion? How can you measure the price of destroying the family and our society? How can you measure the price of defending the 2nd amendment or of the entire Constitution and Bill of Rights? This is the first chance we've had in my lifetime and my parents lifetime before that to have a complete turn around in government. Do not underestimate the evil that a continued liberal activist court can do. We can replace them. It will happen if Republicans don't go all wobbly on us. I believe that ending the liberal activist judiciary is the first step in recovering our constitutional government. What the libs couldn't get done via legislation, they simply got their judges to do through unconstitutional rulings. There is no other way to break their hold other than having a Republican president and a Republican Senate to appoint and confirm conservative judges. Sorry, but there's zero chance that the libertarians can do it.
Besides, you don't have any plan to do anything else, other than try to defeat Bush by electing a Democrat and letting the downhill slide into a socialist hell continue. What the hell good will that do for you or your children?
35
posted on
07/15/2003 4:33:12 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
To: Jim Robinson
wiping out the terrorists and I back him 100% in that effort. I also back him 100% in his effort to turnover the liberal activist judiciary. I'll live with the rest of the baggage just to get those two things accomplishedWhile I agree with the first, I respectfully disagree with the second. The huge expansion of non defense items, the acceleration of motion toward bigger, more expensive government, the continued road to more and more regulations is really a very high price to pay for an unpredictable judiciary.
36
posted on
07/15/2003 4:33:30 AM PDT
by
RJCogburn
("All them Parmelees is teched. Harold's the worst.".....Lucky Ned Pepper)
To: RJCogburn
Well, what else are you going to do? I wish he wasn't doing all these things, but he doesn't take my calls. I'll be damned if I'm going to give up now when we're so close. four more years, eight more, and we get several Supreme Court appoints. Twelve more years and we probably have a complete turnover, not only in the Supreme Court, but in most of the federal judiciary. Why defeat the Republicans now by allowing the Democrats to win? You say Republican judges are unpredictable. Well, I guarantee you liberal judges appointed by Democrats are not. I'll take my chances with the Republicans.
37
posted on
07/15/2003 4:39:46 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
To: Rebelbase
Yes, In fact, I was getting ready to turn in when OWK popped up on the thread. Will be signing off in a few minutes.
38
posted on
07/15/2003 4:41:02 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
To: Jim Robinson
The price is doing whatever he has to do to get reelected and to increase the majority in both houses of Congress. And I could care less what that price is. OK... so let me get this straight.
You want republican control of both houses of congress, the executive branch, and the ability to pick judges.
And you're willing to pay any price for that. Including (as now appears to be the case) the price of republicans becoming just like democrats, thereby eliminating any advantage to liberty and rights there might have been in having republicans in those positions.
Try as I might, I just don't get it Jim.
39
posted on
07/15/2003 4:58:21 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: OWK
Yes lets get more do absolute stupid, do nothing Dems like Hillary in there to rob you blind. At least the Republicans don't steal as much.
40
posted on
07/15/2003 5:02:35 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Here's to Hillary's book sinking like the Clinton 2000 economy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 781-790 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson