Harvard axes HS student

New York Post ^ | July 12, 2003 | Cynthia R. Fagen

[Jimmy Valentine]

A Harvard-bound New Jersey teenager who successfully sued her high school because she wanted to be the sole valedictorian at graduation has been dumped by the Ivy League university, apparently for plagiarism.

Blair Hornstein, 18, was back in the limelight yesterday after a Harvard admission review board revoked her acceptance into the freshman 2007 class, The Harvard Crimson reported.

According to Harvard admission rules, a student’s acceptance can be revoked “if you engage in behavior” that brings into question your honesty, maturity, or moral character.”

Questions were raised about Hornstein’s suitability when she was caught plagiarizing extensively from materials published on the Internet for a teen column she wrote for the local newspaper.

In a letter of apology, published in the paper last month, she said she was not a trained journalist.

“I erroneously thought the way I submitted the articles was appropriate,” the honors graduate from Moorestown HS explained.

Harvard spokesman Robert Mitchell said in a statement: “While it has been reported that Harvard has withdrawn the admission of a student, it remains the policy of the university not to comment on the status of specific applicants.”

The Hornstein family could not be reached for comment.

[Jimmy Valentine]

How much additional scrutiny could her other self-promoting activities stand I wonder.

[Support Free Republic]

These Guys Don't Want You To Donate!
	Tick them off! Donate Here By Secure Server Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

[JesseHousman]

According to Harvard admission rules, a student’s acceptance can be revoked “if you engage in behavior” that brings into question your honesty, maturity, or moral character.”

Must be something new!

[TheBattman]

OK- I must be ignorant....she sued this past school year to be sole valedictorian, yet she had been accepted as a member of the Freshmen class of 2007 at Harvard? What was she suppose to do in the 4 years in between?

Or did someone just mis-type the article?

[Obi-Wandreas]

Class of 2007 is the class that GRADUATES in 2007

[GOP_Proud]

<< Class of 2007 is the class that GRADUATES in 2007 >>>

Although I knew and understood what it meant, it is an odd way to put it. What about all the people who take 5...6...7...or so years to get through? ;>)

Sorry, just bein' cheeky this morning.

[catonsville]

I wonder how much other material she may have allegedly plagiarised while in High School that helped her become valedictorian?

[cricket]

Prabably did not help her 'moral character' in Harvard's eyes that is, to challenge the politically correct, level playing field now favored for not only for every student, but valedictorians as well. . .

[sharktrager]

Not much.

The repesentatives of the organizations she volunteered for all report a great deal of effort was made on their behalf...by her father.

It appears that he pretty much did the work in her name so she could put it on her resume.

[syriacus]

Harvard axes HS student

I saw this thread's headline right after reading a thread about Peter Singer (the Princeton professor who thinks it's good to murder inferior newborns).

It looked to me, at first, like Harvard was attempting to "one-up" Princeton, by supporting the murder of teens.

[Willie Green]

Somthing doesn't smell right.
For some reason, I can't imagine Harvard exhibiting this sort of academic integrity.
There has to be something else that they're not telling us about.

[Willie Green]

Oooops! My mistake.
I now see she wanted to be the "sole" valedictorian.
Greedy little witch didn't want to "share" the honors she cheated so hard to get.
Broke the "honor among thieves" code, not a "team player".
Harvard will only condone cheating if the benefits are shared communally.

[Johnstone]

I don't get it. What was it that Harvard axed the student to do?

[varon]

Sorry, just bein' cheeky this morning.

Does that mean you're moonin' us? ;-)

[river rat]

Shame on you!
(loved it)
Semper Fi

[Old Professer]

Ex Parte punishment from the Ivy League; P.C. in spades.

[NYCVirago]

Prabably did not help her 'moral character' in Harvard's eyes that is, to challenge the politically correct, level playing field now favored for not only for every student, but valedictorians as well. . .

What do you mean? She's the poster child for ADA abuse.

[fish hawk]

Has she tried the N.Y. Times for a job? Chances look good.

[Jimmy Valentine]

No, no. She gamed the systwem to make sure( at the behest of her father) that she would be accepted as a high rated fresham at Harvard. She was working the systekm track not the true knowledge track.

I feel sorry for her because her value set has been totally corrupted by her father. Her life will not be one of enrichement and true learning, I think. Just a series of punchcard achievments. A pity,

[KneelBeforeZod]

more info:

http://www.thecrimson.harvard.edu/today/article348498.html

Published on Friday, July 11, 2003
Harvard Takes Back Hornstine Admission Offer
Decision follows allegations of plagiarism by controversial admit


Harvard has revoked its admission of Blair Hornstine, the prospective member of the Class of 2007 who made national headlines when she sued her school system to ensure she would be her high school’s sole valedictorian.
Following a widely-publicized report that Hornstine had plagiarized material in articles she wrote for her local paper, the Harvard admissions office has rescinded her offer to attend Harvard in the fall, according to a source involved with the decision.

Her acceptance came under scrutiny after her local newspaper, the Courier-Post, reported that Hornstine had “misused sources” in five stories she wrote for the paper and had lifted extensive material directly from speeches and papers published on the Internet. The media attention followed her decision to sue the Moorestown, N.J. school system to ensure she graduate as sole valedictorian of her high school. A federal judge ruled in Hornstine’s favor last month and forbid the school district from naming a co-valedictorian.

According to Director of Undergraduate Admissions Marlyn McGrath Lewis ’70-’73, who declined comment on Hornstine’s case, Harvard admission is contingent on five conditions enumerated for students upon their acceptance—including one which stipulates admission will be revoked “if you engage in behavior that brings into question your honesty, maturity, or moral character.”

Lewis said plagiarism could qualify as grounds for withdrawing acceptance, and according to another source familiar with Harvard’s admissions process, it would be very unusual for Harvard not to act against an individual whose plagiarism was confirmed.

Neither Hornstine nor a spokesperson for the family returned The Crimson’s calls for comment yesterday, and her lawyer, Edwin J. Jacobs, refused to comment when reached by phone.

Hornstine’s spokesperson, Steven K. Kudatzky ’72, had said previously that she was in contact with Harvard about the alleged plagiarism.

According to Lewis, when an application comes under review, Harvard first asks a student “to tell us in his or her own words what happened.”

The admissions committee—composed of both representatives from the admissions office and professors—then meets to discuss the case.

The decision on Hornstine followed such a meeting.

Since the allegations of plagiarism were first reported, Hornstine has defended her actions by way of press releases and family spokespersons.

In a column by Hornstine in June printed next to the Courier-Post’s note about the “misused sources,” Hornstine said her citation problems stemmed from a lack of training in journalism.

“I kept notes on what I had read,” she wrote. “When finalizing my thoughts, I, like most every teenager who has use of a computer, cut and pasted my ideas together. I erroneously thought the way I had submitted the articles was appropriate.”

Hornstine wrote she now understands that she “was incorrect in…thinking that news articles didn’t require as strict citation scrutiny as most school assignments because there was no place for footnotes or end notes.”

At the time, Kudatzky said he thought it unlikely that Harvard would withdraw Hornstine’s admission.

“I am confident that, at the end of the day, Harvard will see that this is a non-issue, and, quite frankly, something that is another example of Blair being singled out and victimized,” he told The Crimson.

Lewis said at the time that “several” offers of admission for the Class of 2007 were under review, though she would not comment on specific cases. But she said offers come under reconsideration for a variety of reasons.

“Most of the time we learn it from the student. Sometimes we hear it from the school. Every once in a while we learn it in the newspaper,” she said.

Harvard’s decision to revoke Hornstine’s offer of admission is the latest development in a saga that began with Hornstine’s $2.7 million suit aimed at preventing her Moorestown, N.J. high school from appointing a second student to share her valedictory honors.

Diagnosed as disabled, Hornstine received most of her high school instruction at home from private tutors, although she was enrolled in the same classes as her peers.

Charging that this setup unfairly advantaged Hornstine, school officials considered naming multiple valedictorians.

In a preliminary injunction, a federal judge agreed with Hornstine that the school’s decision constituted discrimination, and ordered that she be named sole valedictorian.

Hornstine’s suit drew national attention and triggered strong reactions, from Harvard to her hometown.

An online petition, begun before the allegations of plagiarism surfaced, urged Harvard to take back its offer of admission and had garnered 2,685 signatures as of last night.

Hornstine has become a pariah in her town, residents say. Her house was battered with eggs and spray-painted with obscenities, and Hornstine’s family has received death threats over the phone.

Hornstine defended her lawsuit in a written press release, calling her decision to litigate “an act of necessity, aimed at saving others from apathy.”

The media spotlight returned recently when she did not appear at her high school graduation and did not deliver the valedictory address for which she had gone to court.

Hornstine’s case—and her request for damages—remains in litigation pending either a settlement or a jury trial. The two parties will meet before a judge August 13 to discuss further proceedings, Moorestown High School attorney John Comegno said.

In preparation for further discussions, the Moorestown school board is investigating the integrity of Hornstine’s academic coursework, said Cyndy Wulfsberg, the board’s president.

“We need to find out absolutely everything that we can. If it means examination of her work, and if that work is there to be examined, I’m sure we’ll do it,” she said, adding that the board will also likely interview all those involved in Hornstine’s education, including her tutors and guidance counselors.

When contacted by The Crimson yesterday, Moorestown Superintendent Paul A. Kadri said he had not heard of Harvard’s revocation but said he found the news upsetting.

“If it’s true, then I see this as just a very sad chapter to a very sad story,” he said.

—Staff writer Elizabeth W. Green can be reached egreen@fas.harvard.edu.

—Staff writer J. Hale Russell can be reached at jrussell@fas.harvard.edu.