To: woodyinscc; Dolphy
>>>You are spot on!(IMHO)The Hildebeast and the real liar have come to the conclusion that they cannot wait until 2008.
I agree 100% with this statement. But I'm only 60% sure as to your reasons (not that they aren't true...they are) but I have a gut feeling there is more behind the scenes that we don't know. I think there is/was something else in the making that got halted by Bush. It is there in the research...I can feel it; but have yet to see it blatantly.
I think Hillary running for president 2004 is pertinant to whatever is going on. The point is crucial. But I can't find it/well blatantly. I feel it...especially while reading www.iraqwatch.org. But there is something not being said.
Dolphy...this is in response to your:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/944614/posts?page=80#80
157 posted on
07/12/2003 11:18:27 PM PDT by
Calpernia
(Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
To: Calpernia
I think you are right -- I have fought against the fact she was running for President in 2004 forever, but now I think something has moved up the date from 2008 to 2004.
If it is in the Iraq archives, then you can bet it just may have to do with OKC Bombing! I wish I had a picture to post of that mural on the wall with Hillary looking like the cat that swallowed the canary at the memorial service.
Why did the Feds tear down the Murrah building in a couple of weeks after the bombing. Justification was to start the healing process. That is Bravo Sierra IMHO!
178 posted on
07/12/2003 11:30:56 PM PDT by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: Calpernia
I think Hillary running for president 2004 is pertinant to whatever is going on. The point is crucial. But I can't find it/well blatantly. I feel it...especially while reading www.iraqwatch.org. But there is something not being said.Thank you, I will go back to that site with this in mind. As for your feeling of "something going on," I am with you entirely. I am going to do some research. What do you think of Tenet's possible connections to this "something?"
189 posted on
07/12/2003 11:41:13 PM PDT by
Dolphy
To: Calpernia
There may well be!! I have the same feeling, but like you I just can't put my finger on it. With all of their sordid past history you just have to know. They may need to have the power of the Presidency and all the agencies of the executive branch for a cover up of something they fear will come out in the next two years!!
To: Calpernia
"I think Hillary running for president 2004 is pertinant to whatever is going on." Being out of power they do not have the control over information that they had when they were IN power. I can't even guess how many leaks the Clintons have had to plug to keep their crimes under wraps, but there comes a point where enough leaks, even plugged ones, compromise the stability of the structure and sooner or later the dam will burst. Maybe they are afraid that some witness or some piece of evidence can't be depended on to remain airtight until 2008 and they can't take that chance. If they can just seize the reins of power again, they would be in a better position to once again run damage control.
341 posted on
07/13/2003 8:52:27 AM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson