[NormsRevenge]

Ping

[NormsRevenge]

We have NO future with Davi$ ...So what would be so bad about life without Davi$? hhmmmmmm?

[Teacher317]

Stunning and telling that he won re-election so recently.

Also, a sad state of affairs when so recent an election can be overturned. If it succeeds, the Lefties will use this tactic when it is not warranted.

[Support Free Republic]

See that good looking dude on the left? He's got FAR BETTER THINGS to do than conduct Freepathons! Come on, let's get this thing over with.

[SierraWasp]

"Resign. Quit. Clear out your desk. But leave the lights on for the new guy, Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante."

I can just hear Carly Simon singin... "Well it's too late baby, it's too late, though we really did try to make it." Ha Ha Ha Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!

The law is clear... It's been "FILED!" The door is slammed shut even if he does resign!!!

By maternal pervaricator! You weren't even a good staffer for Gov. Moonbean!!! Enjoy your golden shower from the golden state!!!

[TwoStep]

Without voter fraud, Dean Gardner WINS!

[Congressman Billybob]

This article repeats a lie that Professor Susan Estrich of California croaked on Fox News a few days ago. If Davis resigns, it does NOT mean the recall is derailed. California law clearly provides that if the target of a recall resigns "after the recall petition has been filed," that person is replaced only "until the election is held." And this recall petition has not only been filed, it has been completed.

Since Davis intends to donate his ego to Harvard Medical School, he will never resign. However, if he did, Lt.-Gov. Bustamante will take over only until the recall election is held. In that instance, the only question decided in that election will be who replaces Davis for the balance of his current term.

The writer of this story is either incompetent or dishonest, not to know that California law provides for this possibility in plain English. Incompetent or dishonest -- sort of defines more than half of the American press, doesn't it?

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, now up FR, "Fear and Loathing in the Supreme Court."

[hattend]

"If people realized how much this recall is going to cost California taxpayers, they'd scream," Moore said. "It doesn't make sense."

Dear Mr Moore,

Your state is bleeding at the rate of $1 billion (with a B) a month with Davis in there. The recall, by your party's own admission, is $30 million TOTAL!!

Doesn't it make sense to spend a little to save a lot?

Hopefully the recall will but a clamp on the bills coming out of the Dems in Sacramento. Today Davis, Tomorrow Perata, Lockyer, Kuehl, etc.

[judgeandjury]

And it would insert a guy who would be far more palatable -- particularly among valley Latinos -- than the man he'd be replacing, let alone some of the likely recall-ballot options.

Well, since the author is looking at the recall election from a racist point of view, I'll go on record as saying that I want Davis' replacement to be someone who is more palatable to the white residents of California.