Posted on 07/12/2003 7:08:31 AM PDT by RJCogburn
The Bush administration, which had been considering changes that might have eased standards for satisfying the law that expanded opportunities for girls and women in sports, instead reaffirmed yesterday how the law, known as Title IX, is enforced.
In a letter sent to colleges and high schools by Gerald A. Reynolds, the assistant secretary of education for civil rights, the basic provisions of Title IX were upheld. At the same time, Reynolds said in the letter that men's teams should not be eliminated for the sake of Title IX equality.
The National Women's Law Center, a nonprofit organization that works to protect women's rights, called the administration's decision a huge victory for female athletes.
"This puts to rest all the uncertainty and speculation whether the administration and the Department of Education would weaken Title IX," Marcia D. Greenberger, the center's co-president, said in a telephone interview from her office in Washington.
"And it allows attention to be where it should be, to enforce the law and to continue the fight for an equal playing field for young women in this country."
Title IX, passed in 1972, prohibits sex discrimination in educational programs that receive federal aid. As applied to sports, it has pressed institutions to expand opportunities for young women.
The National Women's Law Center says Title IX has led to increases of women's participation in sports of more than 400 percent in colleges and of more than 800 percent in high schools. But Title IX supporters point out statistical equality has not been achieved; 56 percent of college students are women and 42 percent of the athletes are women.
Last June, Secretary of Education Rod Paige created a 15-member commission to study Title IX. Women's groups feared that the commission would propose measures to weaken the law, and the commission's 70-page report did not allay those concerns.
The letter sent yesterday by Reynolds clarified the ways Title IX is currently enforced, but it did not significantly change them.
The schools and colleges were reminded that they could select one of three ways to comply with Title IX:
¶Keep the percentage of female athletes more or less the same as the percentage of female students.
¶Continue to add women's teams or to expand rosters.
¶Offer women's sports that are popular in the institution's region.
Reynolds emphasized that schools should be aware of their options and that they did not have to use the proportionality standard, which has been most commonly employed.
Reynolds reminded the institutions that his office "does not require quotas" and that strict proportionality is not required if the second or third alternatives are used. That could help men's nonrevenue sports like swimming, wrestling and gymnastics, which have lost teams as colleges have struggled to meet Title IX requirements.
"Nothing in Title IX requires the cutting or reduction of teams in order to demonstrate compliance with Title IX, and the elimination of teams is a disfavored practice," he said in the letter.
Greenberger contended that substantial inequality in collegiate sports still existed. Women receive little more than 40 percent of opportunities to play college sports, she said, and athletic scholarships for women are worth, cumulatively, $50 million less than athletic scholarships for men. College athletic budgets are twice as large for men as for women, she added. "While there has been enormous progress, there is still a long way to go," Greenberger said. "It's a relief that there is still a Title IX to rely on."
Eric Pearson, chairman of the College Sports Council, an umbrella organization representing some coaches' groups and athletic groups, was critical of Reynolds's letter, The Associated Press reported. Pearson said the Education Department failed to do enough to prevent the reduction in athletic opportunities for men because of Title IX.
"They've misread the American public on this," Pearson said, according to The Associated Press.
The horse orders a beer.
A few minutes later, John Kerry walks in and sits at the bar. The bartender walks up and says "Hey pal, cheer up. Why the long face?"
I'll stop if you guys will donate and get us over our fundraising goal
This is ok as long as it exempts football. Now, you have 100 guys on the football team and then you have to find a 100 girls to play some sport, any sport, maybe even sausage races. The alternative to have 100 girls in sausage races is to cut 100 men out of non revenue sports like golf, wrestling, etc.
Anything for a vote.
We need a primary opponent who is unafraid t stand on principle.
How bout this for an idea... keep female college admissions down to the same percentage of females in the general pop.
Unfortunately, the equipment costs for sausage races, like football, would be high (those goofy costumes can't be cheap), but I doubt the sausage races would generate the kind of revenue needed, unless they also provide baseball bats for spectators.
This is ok as long as it exempts football. Now, you have 100 guys on the football team and then you have to find a 100 girls to play some sport, any sport, maybe even sausage races. The alternative to have 100 girls in sausage races is to cut 100 men out of non revenue sports like golf, wrestling, etc.
Why not apply these quotas to all the academic departments. Why not require the percentage of female engineering and physics students be "more or less the same as the percentage of female students."
The Clinton administration actually was proposing limiting male enrollment in classes in academic disciplines where males predominate. Title IX is a dangerous law.
3 posted on 07/12/2003 9:11 AM CDT by staytrue
How bout this for an idea... keep female college admissions down to the same percentage of females in the general pop.
That's not too farfetched. Read my previous post.
STEP RIGHT UP FOLKS!
THREE WACKS FOR A SAWBUCK!
For the politicians, it's all about power and percs. That applies to liberals and conservatives. The current adminstration is just one more example of disappointment.
This is just another example of his "conservatism">
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.