Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Interest Alone: STAY OUT OF LIBERIA II
National Review ^

Posted on 07/10/2003 7:22:38 AM PDT by KantianBurke

National Interest Alone
What is a “governmental humanitarian imperative”?
By Christopher Preble

Roger Carstens offers an impassioned, but ultimately misguided, prescription for humanitarian intervention: first in Liberia, and, by extension, in every country in the world where tyrants rule, or where terrorists might operate.

While I cannot speak to the emotions of being prepared to conduct a mission in Rwanda in 1994, and of the stomach-wrenching experience of watching the slaughter of thousands unfold on television, I can speak (as a former military officer) of the emotions of long separation from family and friends. I have therefore opposed dubious missions that do not advance the vital national-security interests of the United States. Nothing that Major Carstens has written causes me to waver from that course.

Let me respond to his main arguments point by point:
1) I know of no such thing as a human-rights imperative for the U.S. government. I know that the U.S. Constitution empowers the federal government to provide for the common defense, and that it grants Congress the power to declare war, and responsibilities as commander-in-chief to the president. Private organizations, religious institutions, and even well-meaning individuals may feel compelled to aid others in need, and they should be free to do so. But the U.S. federal government has no such responsibility.

2) The removal of Charles Taylor might promote regional stability, but it is equally likely to contribute to regional decay. It is true that Taylor has sponsored rebel groups fighting against the governments in Sierra Leone and Ivory Coast. But we have no idea who will replace Taylor. Might it be a rebel leader sponsored by Sierra Leone or the Ivory Coast? Might it be a rebel leader committed to destabilizing both of those countries, and neighboring Guinea, as well? Taylor is an odious criminal. But to assume that the individual who replaces him will implement a fundamental restructuring of Liberian relations with West African states is an enormous leap of faith that is not supported by historical evidence.

3) The timing is, most certainly, not right. Just ask the soldiers of the 3rd Infantry Division extended, yet again, in Iraq. Ask the tens of thousands of reservists called to active duty to police America's sprawling humanitarian empire, from Bosnia and Kosovo to Afghanistan and Iraq. Our military is stretched to the breaking point at a time when we should be focused on the one genuine threat facing us today: Al Qaeda. We spend more on our military than all of the other wealthy nations of the world combined, but we maintain a relatively small number of men and women in uniform. If we continue to divert them away from the defense of vital national-security interests, it will become more and more difficult to maintain our highly professional all-volunteer force, which is, rightly, the most respected military in the world.

4) A U.S.-led intervention would send the wrong message to Africa. It would, once again, absolve African nations of their responsibility to deal with threats, both internal and external. In this respect, the proposed Liberian intervention, the $15 billion AIDS initiative, and the Millennium Challenge Accounts are all related: They constitute a set of misguided policies that do little to reward political and economic reform that might ultimately lead to self-sufficiency. Poverty, disease, and violence go hand-in-hand. The best way to break this cycle in Africa, and throughout the developing world, is to encourage economic development through enlightened trade and development policies that reward individual initiative and private enterprise.

5) The Liberian intervention is a dangerous distraction away from the al Qaeda threat. Taylor's ties to al Qaeda are tenuous, at best. He may know network operatives. But if guilt by association is to be the threshold for deciding to launch a military intervention, then we have a long list of targets. We might begin with the several rebel leaders poised to take control of Liberia following Taylor's departure.

6) This intervention may be technically in line with the Bush National Security Strategy, but if it is, it reveals that that strategy has little to do with protecting American security. For example, Carstens points approvingly to the strategy's stated aim to "make the world not just safer but better." This phrase gives me the chills. Better by whose standards? At what cost? For how long?

Carstens alleges that a Liberian intervention would reflect the values celebrated on the Fourth of July. I am at pains to find even a single statement from any of our Founders to support that claim. Washington and Jefferson both admonished us to avoid entangling ourselves in the affairs of foreign powers. Jefferson protégé James Monroe declared in the famous doctrine that bears his name that the United States would concern itself only with events in the Western Hemisphere. The single best statement of the original intent of our Founders with respect to foreign policy, however, came not from a Founder, per se, but from a Founder's son. On July 4, 1821, John Quincy Adams declared, "America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion only of her own."

Any national-security strategy that departs from this wise advice is not in keeping with the principles of July 4, 1776, but is rather more like the disastrous policies of 1919, following World War I, when Woodrow Wilson pledged to make the world safe for democracy. Our political leaders should be focused on making our democracy safe from the world, not the other way around.

The unfortunate events in Liberia pose no threat to our national security. Military intervention is, therefore, unwarranted and unwise.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: bush; liberia; nationalinterest
Checked and didn't see this posted. Damn good rebuttal to the FR Wilsonites
1 posted on 07/10/2003 7:22:38 AM PDT by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Totally off-topic, but did you know that only about 1,000 people contribute to keep Free Republic up and running? That is out of over 100,000 registered users on this site.
What would you do Without Free Republic?


2 posted on 3/6/02 7:30 AM Pacific by grammymoon:

"What would you do Without FR?

How would You Feel without FR?

Suppose one day you tried to log on and Free Republic wasn’t there?

Where would you get your up to the minute news? How about the live threads as things are happening?

How would you know about the latest Demorat scams, anti-second amendment schemes and all the other liberal, anti-American ploys that are tried every single day?

Insight into world affairs, brilliant wit, sharp retorts, instant information gratification are a few of the things that make FR so vital.

How would you keep on top of things without FR?

How would you know who to contact to complain about the lying politicians, Media Bias, Hollyweirds latest mouth off, sponsors of these idiots, company policies that are unfair and all the other things we need to know to counteract the liberal mindset and the evil plans of liberals?

How would you be part of a Freep?

What would you do without FR????

Freedom isn’t free.

If you enjoy the site and find it a place of like minded Americans to sound off, to get together, to fight back, to have your voice heard and make a difference,PLEASE CONTRIBUTE NOW ! Donate Here By Secure Server

Jim can’t do this alone.

The liberals are sure we won’t be able to keep FR up & running. Prove them wrong. Show them we are indeed united Freepers. Whether it is $5.00, $50.00 or more, it all adds up. Please send a donation now to Free Republic.

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

**** And say THANKS to Jim Robinson! ****

It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 07/10/2003 7:23:41 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
We could reinstate the draft (18-35 yr old, male and female) and then invade every country on the planet. Plus the unemployment problem would be solved. /sarcasm off
3 posted on 07/10/2003 7:42:54 AM PDT by Gary Boldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gary Boldwater
There was a song - "Out of Africa". Words of wisdom.
4 posted on 07/10/2003 8:01:23 AM PDT by azhenfud ("for every government action, there must be an equal and opposite reaction")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sparta; William McKinley
Stay out of Liberia ping
5 posted on 07/10/2003 8:05:36 AM PDT by KantianBurke (The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Exactly what I've been saying. Liberia is a typical fuzzy-minded liberal cause, but if Bush gets involved with it, even by sending "advisors," he will NOT get any thanks from the liberals. They will merely use it as more evidence that he has imperial ambitions.

The article puts the basic objection more clearly than what I've said before (that we have no national security interest in Liberia) in this key paragraph:

I know of no such thing as a human-rights imperative for the U.S. government. I know that the U.S. Constitution empowers the federal government to provide for the common defense, and that it grants Congress the power to declare war, and responsibilities as commander-in-chief to the president. Private organizations, religious institutions, and even well-meaning individuals may feel compelled to aid others in need, and they should be free to do so. But the U.S. federal government has no such responsibility.

6 posted on 07/10/2003 8:07:18 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Here is the first article that NR posted:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/941631/posts

7 posted on 07/10/2003 8:08:06 AM PDT by KantianBurke (The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Bush could by himself discover cures for cancer, AIDS and the common cold, but the lefties would only howl on how it benefits the pharmaceutical industry.
8 posted on 07/10/2003 10:00:20 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gary Boldwater
I actually kind of like that idea. It would definitely make the people who were drafted anti-government, a whole generation of conservatives educated overnight. Name one person who's been in the military without getting a strong sense of how well the government regularly fubars?

Oh, wait, that French guy who served in Vietnam, whatsisname...forget that idea.
9 posted on 07/10/2003 10:05:34 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile ("I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me, Superman!" - Homer Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
xactly :>
10 posted on 07/10/2003 10:46:41 AM PDT by KantianBurke (The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
Good point. Not everyone who has been in the military recalls the fubars (can't see the forest for the trees?). I would say the ones that have been in the military and served in combat have particularly good insight, especially when it comes to putting others in the line of fire.
11 posted on 07/10/2003 11:01:24 AM PDT by Gary Boldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson