Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tenenbaum (D) considers U.S. Senate run (South Carolina)
GreenvilleOnline.com ^ | 7/8/03 | James T. Hammond

Posted on 07/09/2003 11:43:48 PM PDT by LdSentinal

Edited on 05/07/2004 9:05:59 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

COLUMBIA

(Excerpt) Read more at greenvilleonline.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2004; condon; demint; hollings; ravenel; senate; southcarolina; tenenbaum

1 posted on 07/09/2003 11:43:48 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KQQL; JohnnyZ; William Creel; fieldmarshaldj; Kuksool; Coop; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; Pubbie
Ping
2 posted on 07/10/2003 12:01:15 AM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Keep Free Republic Rockin' 'Round The Clock!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 07/10/2003 12:01:40 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Well that blows. Inez is by far their strongest candidate. Charlie Condon can't beat her, but DeMint can. Guess she wised up (or looked at some polls) and realized challenging Mark Sanford in 2006 wasn't gonna work out.
4 posted on 07/10/2003 3:20:58 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (Bumper sticker: "Keep honking -- I'm reloading")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Don't fret so much. I hope DeMint wins the nomination, too, but remember that federal statewide races are a whole different ballgame from other races. Southern states have routinely voted Dem for regular statewide races, but given Republicans wins for President and senator. Cleland was not a poor candidate, he just got beat because Georgians voted for senator like they have for President. Graham's win in SC wasn't as close as some predicted, too. Any credible Republican would have a fine chance of winning a general election for Senate in SC.

The same thing could apply in AK. Just because AK voted for Knowles for Governor, it doesn't follow they'd choose him for President or to go to the Senate.
5 posted on 07/10/2003 3:56:37 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Just because AK voted for Knowles for Governor, it doesn't follow they'd choose him for President or to go to the Senate.

Knowles ain't as popular as Inez. I think she can be beaten by 10%, but the candidate would have to make the case against her, tie her to the national party, and not let her get away with running on eduction and other fuzzy issues. But it's dangerous in southern politics to play hardball against a woman.

6 posted on 07/10/2003 4:06:08 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (Bumper sticker: "Keep honking -- I'm reloading")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Her opponent would focus on the old stand-bys of Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton and on her being unqualified to be a senator and her opposition to Bush's policies. She'll end up in the same pile as Jean Carnahan, Gloria Tristani, Lois Combs Weinberg, Jeanne Shaheen, and Susan Parker.
7 posted on 07/10/2003 6:36:19 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative; JohnnyZ; LdSentinal
SC is one of the most Republican states in the Union. The demographics just don't favor the RATS. Running as a RAT in SC is similar to a Pubbie campaigning in the West Coast. Inez Tenenbaum will, at most, receive 44%-47% of the vote.
8 posted on 07/10/2003 8:23:03 AM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
Inez Tenenbaum will, at most, receive 44%-47% of the vote.

I dunno, Alex Sanders got 44%. There are a lot of unexplored factors in SC, since they've only had one open senate race in the 20th century (hyperbole). Will being female help/hurt Inez? Will her personal popularity carry her in a federal race?

I think the Bush connection & SC's Republicanness will result in a GOP win but 47% is too close to 50% +1 for my comfort. Someone with high negatives like Charlie Condon could conceivably lose, which would be disastrous.

9 posted on 07/10/2003 8:33:52 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (Bumper sticker: "Keep honking -- I'm reloading")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Personally I'm not afraid of Inez.

She seems to me to be way overhyped by a state party with no other stars.

IMO She has a better shot at Governor than Senate because those races are less partisan. But I think she's lose that too.
10 posted on 07/10/2003 5:48:29 PM PDT by Impy (Dear Justice O'Connor, If you want to see your cat alive again.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson