Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ingraham: Bush Not Invincible
www.lauraingraham.com ^ | July 7, 2003 | Laura Ingraham

Posted on 07/07/2003 9:22:15 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 last
To: JoeSchem
Also, I think you're missing the point. Conservatives have a chance to send Bush a message like we did with his father, by running a candidate on his right. The main issue should be illegal immigration, which is the #1 issue facing the country right now. If a mainstream Republican candidate will run on a sensible, non-extremist platform of cutting off illegal immigration, he can (a) win the GOP nomination from Bush and go on to win the presidency in a slam dunk against whatever 'open-the-floodgates' candidate the Democrats run, or (b) send one heck of a message to the Bush camp that they'd better pay more attention to legal citizens than they do illegal immigrants.

In Fantasyland, this would be a good idea. In the real world, it is not. Anyone who challenges Bush to the right will be laughed off by the media and most Bushbots as "extremist" and "hateful". All it would do is make George W seem more "reasonable" by comparison to the 70% out there who aren't conservatives.

And if this candidate really did gain traction (possibly from DUmmies and other hateful Dems seeing a way to attack Bush through crossover primaries), it would just weaken Bush's standing in the general election so we wind up with Clinton II in 2004 (as we did Clinton I in 1992).

The party apparatus is already geared to support George W in 2004. That's not possibly going to change. He has approval numbers that are higher than any other Republican candidate you care to bring up except possibly the further-left Rudolph Giuliani and the even further-left Arnold Schwarzenegger.

After Clinton, Republicans in 2000 clamored for a guy that was "electable". No more Doles, remember? Well, they have him and they don't plan on tossing him overboard. Even if he's not everything we want (and trust me, he's not everything *I* want), he can and will win re-election. Nobody further to the right, at least in 2004, has a prayer of doing that.

121 posted on 07/09/2003 8:09:12 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (Half the people you encounter are below average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Nice list. Are you keeping that up yourself or is there another source?
122 posted on 07/09/2003 8:20:49 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ModernDayCato
bttt
123 posted on 07/09/2003 8:24:50 AM PDT by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: MNLDS
The purpose of the Consitution is to define and limit the powers of the Federal government--not to define religious/social or even most legal institutions. The Constitution is silent on marriage, as it is silent on almost everything. Leave it that way.

Any Supreme Court decision can be reversed by a later Court. Using the Constitution as a form of uber-legislation is, and has always been, a bad idea.

124 posted on 07/09/2003 8:31:16 AM PDT by TigerTale (From the streets of Tehran to the Gulf of Oman, let freedom ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost; justshe
Justshe made that list from one of my "Southack Says" columns earlier this year, but refined it and as made it more current.

So thank her.

125 posted on 07/09/2003 9:03:44 AM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Southack; chiller
I never saw your "Southack Says" column. Link, please?

Although that is NOT to say that many of the items I picked up didn't come originally from your column.

The basis for the list I compiled was actually in a Jim Robinson post from months and months ago and from a list 'chiller' started HERE. I compiled the list from various FR links, as I stated at the beginning of George W. Bush--The First 30 Months.

"I have made every attempt to list as many items as I could recall....or find by perusing MANY threads. I am sure I have missed some items.
*snip*

I have gleaned these items from multiple threads and posts going back over two years on Free Republic. These are NOT listed in any 'time-line' order.

126 posted on 07/09/2003 10:02:36 AM PDT by justshe (Eliminate Freepathons! Become a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: justshe; chiller
Good point about chiller starting the topic. Take a look at my original post to chiller back then:

To: chiller

Bush also killed the liberal ABA's role in vetting federal judges for Congress.

GWB signed an executive order enforcing the Supreme Court's Beck decision, too. The Beck decision wasn't being enforced because the Clinton administration signed an EO ordering the department not to touch any cases revolving around it. Thus, the Clinton administration was DEFYING the Supreme Court, yet the press refused to report it (what, "bias" in our media?!). Now the SCOTUS' decision is being enforced, which means that individual union workers can recoup every penny of their union dues that got spent (or gets spent in the future) for political causes/lobbying of which they disagree.

President Bush repealed Clinton's CO2 rules that were choking off electricity production in California (causing blackouts at the time), and GWB also repealed Clinton's OSHA "ergonomic" regulations that were about to put every home-business out of work.

Bush brought back our EP-3 intel plane and crew from China without any bribes or bloodshed, and he has started withdrawing our troops from Bosnia.

Another thing that the press won't repeat is that President Bush signed the LARGEST nuclear arms reduction in world history with Russia this year. Heck, the "anti-nuclear" Lefties in Europe even had the nerve to PROTEST Bush going to Europe to sign that treaty, and still the biased American media wouldn't report the irony.

President Bush's comprehensive review of our military, which was completed just prior to 9/11/01, accurately reported that ASYMMETRICAL WARFARE was our most pressing defense concern. This was the first comprehensive top-down review of our military in years.

Bush has expanded NATO, killed Kyoto, killed the International Criminal Court (for the U.S., anyway), armed pilots, legally withdrawn from the ABM treaty, and presently has CONSTRUCTION in process on the first ten ABM silos in Alaska, so that America will have a defense against North Korean nukes in a little more than a year.

Oh, and President Bush signed into law his campaign promise of the largest Dollar-amount tax cut in the history of the world.

Not too shabby for having an opposition Senate sniping at his every proposal...

56 posted on 12/22/2002 11:55 PM CST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

127 posted on 07/09/2003 10:06:15 AM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Yep!

I think MANY of those posts have made it into many lists/posts on FR. Great minds OBVIOUSLY think alike. Mine was just the latest compliation of a lot of great minds.
128 posted on 07/09/2003 10:12:42 AM PDT by justshe (Eliminate Freepathons! Become a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: justshe
FYI, the "Southack Says" column on Bush's accomplishments was posted under "Beck Decision" half way down from Here
129 posted on 07/09/2003 10:13:08 AM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: MNLDS
This article totally ignores the potential impact of cross-over voting. The Republicans alread have a strong candidate, which is why I will be voting for the Rev. Al Sharpton in the Dimocratic primary. I urge other conservatives to cast their vote for this visionary candidate as well!
130 posted on 07/09/2003 10:18:51 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshe; Southack
Thanks!
131 posted on 07/09/2003 10:24:51 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Thanks! I had never seen that website.
132 posted on 07/09/2003 10:30:27 AM PDT by justshe (Eliminate Freepathons! Become a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
--Bush likes to say, "Leave no child behind" when it comes to education. How about "Leave no citizen behind" when it comes to learning to appreciate this nation.


Well said. I'll be looking up that book on Reagan. Sounds interesting.
133 posted on 07/09/2003 4:42:38 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (It's all part of life's rich pageant, you know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: MNLDS
Here it is...

...and I think it's available through the Conservative Book Club (Amazon for sure).

134 posted on 07/09/2003 4:46:09 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson