Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/07/2003 5:06:52 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PeaceBeWithYou
Energy density sucks.

Conversion efficiency sucks.

Transmission sucks.

Storage sucks.

It sucks.

Go nuclear !!!

2 posted on 07/07/2003 5:08:54 PM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
DON'T MEAN TO BUG YOU.....
BUT CAN YOU HELP?
PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC
Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to


FreeRepublic
LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO
CA 93794
Or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
It's on the Breaking News Sidebar

3 posted on 07/07/2003 5:10:27 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
They will provide peak power of 84 kW, enough to supply 60 typical homes.

They must be excluding electrically heated houses in this calculation. That represents one third of the houses.

4 posted on 07/07/2003 5:13:06 PM PDT by Number_Cruncher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
The old thin film and mono-crystalline products:

http://www.nwpwr.com/shell.htm

Are any solar panels made with Lexan covers? Otherwise, they wouldn't last through a single spring hailstorm in Texas.

5 posted on 07/07/2003 5:16:40 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
They will provide peak power of 84 kW, enough to supply 60 typical homes.

Careful, now is the peak power enough to supply 60 homes or the average power enough?

Gee, what's the diffence between the peak and the *average* power? Usually, its huge.

Furthermore, since the sun doesn't always shine and storage is very messy and expensive, you will ALWAYS HAVE TO BUILD THE SAME NUMBER OF *REAL* POWER PLANTS to get reliable power.

That's right the exact same number of natural gas, coal, and nuke plants will have to constructed with or without this feel good nonsense.

This stuff adds power NOT capacity.

6 posted on 07/07/2003 5:26:14 PM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Cut corners, cut corners, cut corners,... hey wait a sec!
21 posted on 07/07/2003 8:40:13 PM PDT by m18436572
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
The greater power output is the result of a change in design. Whereas the solar cells in the lines being replaced have rounded corners, those in the new modules are almost square. The unoccupied spaces between the cells are smaller so that the end-user obtains more power for the area covered. The new modules are called the Shell SQ line, with SQ standing for square.

In other words, there's no actual advance here, it's just a small redesign that provides a small benefit. When solar power is economically viable, then I'll be interested in it.

30 posted on 07/08/2003 9:57:32 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson