Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Energy density sucks.

Conversion efficiency sucks.

Transmission sucks.

Storage sucks.

It sucks.

Go nuclear !!!

2 posted on 07/07/2003 5:08:54 PM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AdamSelene235
AdamSelene235 says:   "Energy density sucks. Conversion efficiency sucks. Transmission sucks. Storage sucks. It sucks."

Let's review some basics about photovoltaics (solar cells) and see how much sense this really makes.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE USE SOLAR CELLS TO
CONVERT THE SUNS ENERGY TO ELECTRICITY:

    SOURCE   LOSS - %     POWER - W/m2
  1.     solarconstant     --   1370W
2.   atmosphere     27     1000W
3.   clouds     21     790W
4.   sun angle     40     474W
5.   night     50     237W
6.   cell efficiency     87       31W
7.   dirt/reflection     10       28W
8.   packaging     20       22W
9.   AC convert     25       17W
10.   storage     30       12W

Net efficiency = 0.85% (!)

The current rate of U.S. energy consumption is 3.3 trillion Watts. Based on the above data we would only need to cover the entire state of Nevada with solar cells! And because of a 6% annual growth in our energy consumption, in another 12 years we would also have to cover the entire state of Arizona with Solar cells! Yet the current world-wide production of solar cells is so small that it couldn't even keep up with the annual growth rate in energy usage, much less supply enough solar cells to produce the base amount of energy usage.

23 posted on 07/08/2003 2:58:56 AM PDT by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson