[mrobison]

Retire already!

[smith288]

If Breyer really thinks it should soccumb to international will, Breyer should be impeached post haste.

Incredible.

[dansangel]

Scalia: Dangerous dicta, however, since this court ... should not impose foreign moods, fads, or fashions on Americans," he said quoting the 2002 Foster v. Florida case.

What part of that doesn't Breyer understand?

Sheesh.

.45MAN PING

[rep-always]

That this man sits on this court and can speak this way is a travesty.

[rintense]

This is truly incredible. I am at a loss for words.

[Bikers4Bush]

Can justices be removed from the bench? If any of them feel that the constitution should be subordinate to world opinion then they need to be removed immedialtely and tried for treason.

[Sgt_Schultze]

So, in accordance with Breyer's allegience to international concensus, if the World Court decides that there is no right to dissent from liberal orhtodoxy, the first amendment too might be squelched. We know they already have designs on the second amendment. Breyer is an infected sore on the American judiciary.

[Cultural Jihad]

Impeachment (if that's okay with the Europeans).

[Spottys Spurs]

Any Supreme Court judge who thinks that way needs to go! This is still the United States of America. I'm not interested in being part of any "global" b.s.

[B Knotts]

He should be impeached.

[AAABEST]

I'd hate to look into this a$$hole's mind and see what he really thinks if he's willing to make such an absurd statement on national television.

He's admitting that he operates illegally and in violation of his oath of office. Notice how he makes Sandra Day his little buddy. Very scary.

[1Old Pro]

It amazes me that idiots like Breyer and O'Connor can actually get nominated to the lands highest court.

[jwalsh07]

"We see all the time, Justice O'Connor and I, and the others, how the world really – it's trite but it's true – is growing together," Breyer said. "Through commerce, through globalization, through the spread of democratic institutions, through immigration to America, it's becoming more and more one world of many different kinds of people. And how they're going to live together across the world will be the challenge, and whether our Constitution and how it fits into the governing documents of other nations, I think will be a challenge for the next generations

Antiguv, you were saying that the majority in Kennedy was only replying to Burger vis a vis the Europeans.

Think again. This guy should be tarred and feathered, forget impeachment.

He is stating quite clearly that the US Constitution, in his view, will simply become a refernce in a world of more elite references. Cripes.

[SkyPilot]

"We see all the time, Justice O'Connor and I, and the others, how the world really – it's trite but it's true – is growing together," Breyer said.

Bryer would like to buy the World a Coke, and Sprinkle it with Love.

He will be happy when the Anti-Christ is in charge (for awhile anyway). Too bad his guy eventually loses to God.

[TheBattman]

Further proof that at least two justices on the SCOTUS should be impeached immediately. They have both publicly admitted that the Constitution is irrelevant - even though they are sworn to uphold that very same document.

Of course, their view of eh Constitution just strengthens their position of power. If the Constitution is so "flexible" as Sandra Day-O has indicated, then the specific authority placed in the SCOTUS is also flexible - thus allowing them to create law, not just interpret.

If something doesn't give soon, I am afraid the USA as we know it is done for - it's leftist ideas like those expressed by these two that are going to bring us down.

[Bryan24]

This is utterly incredible.

I don't know why I thought they would be immune, but it is clear that these judges are intoxicated with power. This is why I DESPISE any judge who is not a strict constructionist. Good grief, even a liberal could be strict constructionist. But these "living Constitution" people are the death of the republic.


BTW, have these guys ever heard of a amending the Constitution?

[chimera]

Do Justices take an oath similar to elected officials (and others), containing the "preserve, protect, and defend" wording regarding the Constitution? If so, one could reasonably argue that this particular Justice is treading dangerously close to violating his oath of office, and therefore might be subject to impeachment proceedings.

[boycott]

Maybe he thinks it should be the SCOTUN (Supreme Court of the United Nations)? The guy's a complete IDIOT!!!

[steplock]

ONE STEP CLOSER to redeclaring our:

Declaration of Independence

Patriots! Time to sign your name~!

[Bryan24]

I want eveyone to take note of something VERY extraordinary here:

A sitting SCOTUS member went on national TV, with another SCOTUS member who agreed with him, to publicly argue against a postion taken by another SCOTUS member with a dissenting view.

To my recollection, this has NEVER been done before. Breyer is essentially lobbying the public to support the position he took in their majority decision in the sodomy case.

The more I think about this, the more astounded I am.

[Kevin Curry]

In the Lawrence v Texas case decided June 26, Justice Anthony Kennedy gave as a reason for overturning a Supreme Court ruling of 17 years earlier upholding sodomy laws that it was devoid of any reliance on the views of a "wider civilization."

Tell me again, tpaine: how are these champions of sodomy going to decide with respect to the RKBA?

These unelected nanny government buttinskis are your heroes, tpaine--not mine.