[Bryan24]

I want eveyone to take note of something VERY extraordinary here:

A sitting SCOTUS member went on national TV, with another SCOTUS member who agreed with him, to publicly argue against a postion taken by another SCOTUS member with a dissenting view.

To my recollection, this has NEVER been done before. Breyer is essentially lobbying the public to support the position he took in their majority decision in the sodomy case.

The more I think about this, the more astounded I am.

[M. Peach]

Astute observation - You are absolutely right - It just goes to show you how incredibly powerful the homosexual agenda is.

[steveegg]

Here's to a backfire of the new stragedy (sp-intentional).

[metesky]

Good observation, Bryan. It is unprecedented. Lobbying.

[bvw]

I think it's grand that Breyer had done this public soapboxing --- these issues need to come to a full head, and perhaps this helps do so. As of their very bad ruling two weeks ago, the Constitution, Legislature and all Legislated Law are effectively nullities -- only what a Judge rules is the Law.

[SteamShovel]

The more I think about this, the more astounded I am.

Me Too... They apparently don't fear impeachment.