Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freep this poll) GOPUSA Poll: Amendment to Ban Gay Marraige
GOPUSA ^ | 07/06/2003 | Unknown

Posted on 07/07/2003 6:06:58 AM PDT by sr4402

Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) said that he supported an amendment to the Constitution that would ban any marriage in the United States except a union of a man and a woman. Would you support such an amendment?

(Excerpt) Read more at gopusa.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: marriageamendment
This poll needs freeping, looks the the democratic underground has been busy here.
1 posted on 07/07/2003 6:06:59 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sr4402
DNC and the Gay Mafia.
2 posted on 07/07/2003 6:12:52 AM PDT by onyx (Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
bump & freeped

18% YES
81% NO

3 posted on 07/07/2003 6:24:09 AM PDT by apackof2 (Listen much, talk little, learn greatly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: apackof2
YES is rising fast (sarcasm) --- now at 19%.
4 posted on 07/07/2003 6:45:07 AM PDT by onyx (Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Forget polls, when the fundraisers call, tell them you won't be donating any more money to a Republican Party that allows the SCOTUS to legislate from the bench.
5 posted on 07/07/2003 6:49:36 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
GOPUSA Poll

Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) said that he supported an amendment to the Constitution that would ban any marriage in the United States except a union of a man and a woman. Would you support such an amendment?

Yes
-- 21%

No
-- 78%

Total Votes: 3965

GOPUSA Poll
6 posted on 07/07/2003 6:58:34 AM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
This poll needs freeping, looks the the democratic underground has been busy here.

Are you sure? Maybe a majority does not think Frist's amendment is a good idea.

Personally, I don't think the government putting up road blocks on this issue will accomplish anything in the long run and will actually eventually lead to rulings by the goverment that will have the effect of strengthening the status of gay marriage.

You can not legislate morality. Trying to do it only leads to the opposisite of what you intended - or so I say. Certainly not every issue can be viewed this way, but this one can.

7 posted on 07/07/2003 7:11:39 AM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Yes 23% No 77%
Why have the churches in this country been so silent in the wake of the supreme court decision last week concerning the Texas sodomy laws?
8 posted on 07/07/2003 7:13:31 AM PDT by m&maz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
GOPUSA Poll

Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) said that he supported an amendment to the Constitution that would ban any marriage in the United States except a union of a man and a woman. Would you support such an amendment?

Yes
-- 23%

No
-- 76%

Total Votes: 4085

GOPUSA Poll

9 posted on 07/07/2003 7:14:16 AM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) said that he supported an amendment to the Constitution that would ban any marriage in the United States except a union of a man and a woman. Would you support such an amendment?

Yes
-- 27%

No
-- 72%

Total Votes: 4356

GOPUSA Poll

10 posted on 07/07/2003 7:51:50 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (~~~ http://www.ourgangnet.net ~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
72 to 27 against. Much as I dislike the idea of gay marriage becoming "mainstream," (and the queers, overreacting as usual, won't be happy until they can push this in our faces) the Constitution is the basis for our laws, not our morals.

I would much rather the time and effort this will take be put into a term limits amendment.

11 posted on 07/07/2003 7:56:57 AM PDT by upchuck (Contribute to "Republicans for Al Sharpton for President in 2004." Dial 1-800-SLAPTHADONKEY :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Yes -- 33%

No -- 66%

Total Votes: 4823

Bump
12 posted on 07/07/2003 9:12:25 AM PDT by Between the Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: m&maz
Why have the churches in this country been so silent

because they support the homosexual activists.

13 posted on 07/07/2003 10:16:00 AM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Yes
-- 40%

No
-- 59%

Total Votes: 5472

Bump
14 posted on 07/07/2003 10:47:46 AM PDT by Between the Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
"You can not legislate morality."

Sure we can. It's done all the time. Every law that's on the books was put there because someone thought something was wrong and needed to be illegal.

15 posted on 07/07/2003 11:25:57 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Yup, you are right, we made drugs illegal and there is no drug use. We made alcohol illegal during prohibition and that stopped people from drinking.

Like I said, you can not legislate morality.

16 posted on 07/07/2003 12:45:43 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Yes -- 50%

No -- 49%

Total Votes: 6931
17 posted on 07/07/2003 1:44:32 PM PDT by Between the Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
God forbid that we stop making MORAL judgements. There would be no legal authority, and chaos and moral decay would prevail. But getting back to the basic premise of this thread:

Personally I don't care if they allow tax breaks for people who are legally committed. I do have a problem with it being called a "MARRAIGE". MARRAIGE is between a MAN AND A WOMAN. Not a woman and a woman or a man and a man.

As long as what happens is between CONSENTING adults...and in the privacy of their own homes, the only JUDGE of that behavior should be between them and God.

While I'm NOT their judge.. I do have a responsibility to speak out against the sin, but to NOT judge the sinner.

We are talking LAW vs morality, and judgement. We are talking about saying it is LEGAL and OK to be MARRIED if you are of the same sex. MARRIAGE and the act of BEING MARRIED is a HETEROSEXUAL ACT and has been since its beginning. As a heterosexual MARRIED Couple.. I say NO WAY.

Call it what you want, make up a name for it. But it isn't a MARRAIGE.

That's like saying a guy can get another guy pregnant.

We passed legislation AGAINST gay marraige in California. It would be nice if some day people respected the rights of the MAJORITY of the people. I would be extremely PLEASED to no end if there was something that put this to rest for once and for all.

It is getting "beyond" ridiculous.

18 posted on 07/07/2003 11:46:08 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
EXACTLY... SUPPORT HJR 56....

List of CO-Sponsors GROWING - Call YOUR Congressman.

19 posted on 07/18/2003 11:07:01 AM PDT by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson