Posted on 07/06/2003 9:17:47 PM PDT by Pokey78
Edited on 04/23/2004 12:05:41 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
John G. Adams, a key figure in the proceedings that effectively ended Sen. Joseph McCarthy's career, passed quietly from the scene last week at age 91. Not surprisingly, his death made no news; it's been a while since those heady days when McCarthy launched his investigations of the Army, which had, he charged, been shielding countless Communist agents at Fort Monmouth and elsewhere. It fell to Adams, the Army's chief counsel, to deal with the charges, which he did to devastating effect in the Army-McCarthy hearings that held the nation in thrall in the 1950s.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
Congress does not normally classify Defence Department documents. The Venona papers were classified by the originator, the National Security Agency/Central Security Service (and its predecessor). NSA/CSS was from the start of the Defence Department a DOD activity (before 1947 its predecessors came under the War and Navy Departments).
A large set of the Venona intercepts were declassified by the originator in the early nineties. Most of them have since been reclassified and removed from NSA's public/historical websites. The most probable reason (here I am speculating, I have no direct knowledge) is that a possible compromise of still-useful intelligence sources and methods was found within the files.
In any event, Congress had no involvement in Venona. It is possible that senior party leaders (before the 1970s and oversight committees) and later the chairmen and ranking members of the intelligence oversight committees were briefed in.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
It's clear that a whole generation of people who've been uninformed or misinformed about that era now have access to information that's been actively suppressed by academia and the media. Many of them are eagerly investigating it. I see proof of that on many FR threads. The fact that certain people like Joe Conason and others are setting up an anti-Coulter blitz is very significant.
Whether Ann's "leggy blondeness" appeals to men or not is not relevant to anything. I'm rather turned off by her appearance and I'm a man. I assess the ideas in books, not the appearances of the writers.
Spot on, Sir.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.