1 posted on
07/06/2003 8:07:20 PM PDT by
SheLion
To: *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; Madame Dufarge; ...
Personally, I wish Phillip Morris would go out of business. Why the hell are they even SELLING cigarettes, they are sticking it to the smokers so bad, it's mind boggling. I wouldn't buy a Phillip Morris cigarette if they were the last ones on earth.!
I HATE PM! They are WORSE then the ANTI smoker!
2 posted on
07/06/2003 8:09:41 PM PDT by
SheLion
To: SheLion
That sounds to me like standard business practices .
Almost all manufacturers give higher discounts to prefered resellers. When I had my own telecomm business, the manufacturers offered me huge discounts if I would only carry their equipment.
I didn't sue them - but then I must be stupid? Or NOT a communist or socialist?
4 posted on
07/06/2003 8:31:38 PM PDT by
steplock
(, etc, etc,)
To: SheLion
Just another case of trying to keep business from doing business. Can't let that happen.
6 posted on
07/06/2003 8:40:40 PM PDT by
BfloGuy
(The past is like a different country, they do things different there.)
To: SheLion
Earl Booze, one of the plaintiffs' lawyersWell, we got cigarettes and Booze in this story. All we're missing is the sex....
8 posted on
07/06/2003 8:48:36 PM PDT by
freebilly
(I think they've misunderestimated us....)
To: SheLion
"We plan to vigorously defend the case, Too bad they didn't vigorously defend themselves against big governments.
To: SheLion
Coke has a monopoly in all resturants around here and I prefer Pepsi, I'm going to call Johnny Cocheran and get rich.

38 posted on
07/08/2003 1:40:20 PM PDT by
putupon
(Retox or detox, that is the question.)
To: SheLion
In the interests of brevity I suggest that we refer to this case in the future as Booze vs Big Tobacco.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson