Skip to comments.
Website turns tables on government officials
Boston Globe ^
| 7/4/2003
| Hiawatha Bray
Posted on 07/05/2003 2:15:14 PM PDT by DannyTN
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:10:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Annoyed by the prospect of a massive new federal surveillance system, two researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are celebrating the Fourth of July with a new Internet service that will let citizens create dossiers on government officials.
The system will start by offering standard background information on politicians, but then go one bold step further, by asking Internet users to submit their own intelligence reports on government officials -- reports that will be published with no effort to verify their accuracy.
(Excerpt) Read more at business.boston.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: privacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: DannyTN
"Politicians should have access to those data as well. This is only fair in face of Freedom of Information Act. "
hmmmm...yes, but shouldn't they be stonewalled first and then have to sue before they are given it? You are right, this should be the standard and proper procedure.
21
posted on
07/05/2003 5:16:28 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
To: msdrby
ping
22
posted on
07/05/2003 5:23:15 PM PDT
by
Prof Engineer
(I'm a man, But I can change, If I have to, I guess)
To: DannyTN
"
but shouldn't they be stonewalled first and then have to sue before they are given it?"
Yes, the standard, "I find this troubling", should suffice!
To: All
Just FYI, FWIW, you can gather a lot of info using these:
General search engines:
HotBot
Description: An advanced search engine. There are many configurable options, both in simple as in advanced search mode.
-http://www.google.com/advanced_search--
-http://www.profusion.com/--
100's OF SEARCH ENGINES Specific search engines: Skipease: White pages, Yellow pages, Reverse lookups, US Govt. Directories, Inmate/Prison locators, SS# info, Bankruptcy, Owner of Domain names, Medical profession, Campaign Contributions, Deceased person, US Corporation info, etc. NewsTrove
-ttp://www.tray.com/-- -http://www.opensecrets.org/-- -http://www.issues2000.org/-- -http://www.activistcash.com-- -http://www.consumerfreedom.com-- -http://www.ussearch.com/wlcs/index.jsp?srcAdID=4040003011&sourceid=-- www.guidestar.org
Other useful sources:
-Look up ISP's, webmaster emails, etc-- -phone numbers, addresses, maps & directions for Business and People in the U.S.-- -IP Address Locator Tool-- -Just the Facts-- -Archival Databases (AAD) System-- -Researchers: What are your favorite research sites?-- |
24
posted on
07/05/2003 5:33:01 PM PDT
by
backhoe
To: DannyTN; ItsBacon
{{{ Chris Csikszentmihalyi }}} {{ Must have sucked to have been him in first grade. }}
{ LOL, you need an MIT degree just to be able to pronounce that. }
Not if you're of Hungarian heritage.
Whenever I suspect that the members of Free Republic are starting to get enough knowledge to rise above the stereotype of the provincial American yahoo who doesn't know anything about the other cultures of the world they live in, and who doesn't care to know ...
... well, some people come along to wipe that notion clean out of my head. Again.
25
posted on
07/05/2003 5:36:16 PM PDT
by
Greybird
("War is the health of the State." -- Randolph Bourne)
To: DannyTN
big deal. That already exists--it is called "Free Republic".
26
posted on
07/05/2003 5:49:29 PM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: The Hon. Galahad Threepwood
And your argument that secret, incorrect information, is less damaging than published, incorrect information, is ... ?
To: coloradan
I offered no such argument. I said that politicans might sue for libel if this website publishes lies about them.
To: DannyTN
"reports that will be published with no effort to verify their accuracy."
It seems that is EXACTLY what our goobermint does to us.
The Denver Police Department was caught with thousands of intel files they wrote on many private citizens who had committed no crime. Those reports were full of inaccuracies and false statements. They claimed people were militia, anti-government, terrorists, whatever they needed to say to get more funding to keep their cushy jobs of spying on innocent Americans.
It seems we have government employees who need to make themselves useful before they lose their jobs. Add in a touch of spying is cool, and blam-o, instant commie bastard spying on Americans in the name of the state.
29
posted on
07/05/2003 6:04:31 PM PDT
by
PatrioticAmerican
("Illegal immigratns" are invading in the name of Mexico, therefore, let's call them "immivaders".)
To: A. Pole
"Politicians should have access to those data as well. This is only fair in face of Freedom of Information Act."
Yeah, sure, buddy. Try that FOIA on your FBI files, local police, CIA, or other goobermint files and see how far you can piss up that rope.
30
posted on
07/05/2003 6:06:09 PM PDT
by
PatrioticAmerican
("Illegal immigratns" are invading in the name of Mexico, therefore, let's call them "immivaders".)
To: The Hon. Galahad Threepwood
i'm sure they know...but when a pol makes a really bad vote does he or she really want all the attention that a lawsuit would bring?
To: The Hon. Galahad Threepwood
I didn't say that you did. I asked what the argument was.
To: ItsBacon
Maybe in your neighborhood. But in cities with large Hungarian populations, not so sucky.
To: coloradan
You seem to be as confused about what you said as you are about what I said.
To: backhoe
Egads, I could spend the whole of next month exploring these sites, Thanks!
To: Greybird
"Not if you're of Hungarian heritage"My apologies to all those of Hungarian heritage.
36
posted on
07/05/2003 8:50:11 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: The Hon. Galahad Threepwood
I see you are more interested in playing word games rather than answering my question.
What argument can you present, if any, that files the government may have on us, which are secret and unappealable, may have errors in them, and that this fact is no less damaging to one's ability to function in society, than libel is, which is publically published for all to see? (There are, admittedly, laws against and defenses for libel.)
Thank you in advance for your consideration of, and response to, my question.
To: DannyTN
bumping for later.
To: DannyTN
search ping
To: DannyTN
A buck-fifty says the gubbermint will find a way to shut them down as soon as they start getting any traction.
40
posted on
07/06/2003 1:18:46 AM PDT
by
Ronin
(Qui tacet consentit!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson