To: _Jim
But not always. I listened to him from when he first went national until about a year ago. I loved him, but he devolved into a ball-less wonder and a shameless rubber stamp. So sorry to disappoint, but I just don't fit into your neat little category.
To: Thorondir
I loved him, but he devolved into a ball-less wonder and a shameless rubber stamp. Another shameless phallic reference.
Might I suggest crossword puzzles? They're great at improving one's vocabulary.
67 posted on
07/04/2003 6:39:40 PM PDT by
sinkspur
To: Thorondir
I loved him, but he devolved into a ball-less wonder and a shameless rubber stamp. THIS is much more a matter of *your* perception (you've become jaded, insensitive to the smaller factors that ultimately make a difference) than any real shift in Rush. It's also a symptom of waaaaaaay too much time surfing FR as a matter of fact ...
You also FAIL to note that he is/has been predicting the drastic actions if the democrats to a "T". NOONE ELSE has made and stood by predictions such as these 'cept Rush ...
69 posted on
07/04/2003 6:41:52 PM PDT by
_Jim
(First you must INDICT the ham sandwhich - THEN you can work to CONVICT it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson