Posted on 07/03/2003 2:15:35 AM PDT by kattracks
(CNSNews.com) - The Fox Movie Channel, apparently torn between the sensitivities of Asian Americans and the desires of its viewers, has amended an earlier decision to cancel a Charlie Chan film festival.
Fox had announced the cancellation of the broadcasts last week after complaints from Asian American groups about the fictional Chinese detective the groups said was portrayed as a racially offensive stereotype.
However, the Fox Movie Channel, which serves about 20 million households through either cable or satellite service, added a sentence late Tuesday to its website statement indicating a possible shift in the network's decision to cancel the Chan film festival.
The sentence added to the Fox website reads as follows:
"Fox Movie Channel will schedule Charlie Chan films based on the feedback of its subscribers."
The cable channel's apparent softening of its position is firing up Asian groups who had protested the airing of the Chan films in the first place.
"This is really the second time [Fox Movie Channel has] caved to public pressure. I would imagine that the movies are probably going to run now," Andrew Rice, spokesman for the National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium (NAPALC), told CNSNews.com.
The NAPALC, along with the National Asian American Telecommunications Association (NAATA), have been among the leaders of the campaign to remove Chan films from the airwaves. The NAATA called Chan "one of the most offensive Asian caricatures of America's cinematic past." More than 40 films were produced featuring the crime-solving character Charlie Chan, beginning in the silent era of the 1920s and continuing into the late 1940s.
Rice predicted supporters of the Chan films would dominate the "feedback" that Fox will receive.
"It's disappointing. Anytime you're dealing with a minority group, you are not going to be the majority," Rice said.
Tim Lucas, editor and co-publisher of the monthly magazine Video Watchdog, one of the leaders of the effort by Chan fans to persuade Fox to reverse its cancellation, sees the new website "feedback" statement as a hopeful sign.
"It shows me that [the Fox Movie Channel is] beginning to give some credence to the [Chan supporters'] viewpoints, who never had a chance to make their opinion known prior to the decision to cancel," Lucas told CNSNews.com.
Lucas welcomes a decision based on viewer feedback because he believes Chan fans have the facts on their side.
"The people who are objecting to the [Charlie Chan] ban are explaining why in well-reasoned terms, and the [Asian] organizations that have asked for the films to be withdrawn have been falling back on misinformation," Lucas explained.
"I have received nothing but support from Asian-Americans' correspondence," he added.
Rice's group, the NAPALC, earlier on Tuesday had praised Fox for its decision to cancel the Chan broadcasts. In a press release, the group praised the movie channel as "a responsible corporate citizen because they understand that in 2003 we need to move beyond stereotypes."
Rice said a Fox Movie Channel executive told him the network cancelled the Chan films because they were "getting a lot of negative feedback, and [the Fox executive] felt like it was the right thing to do - to pull the movies because they were so offensive to the Asian community."
But Rice now believes that if Fox allows the films to be broadcast as the result of popularity or "feedback" from viewers, the network will have forfeited its ethical concern for racial sensitivity.
Novelist Earl Derr Biggers created the fictional Chan character, and the Chan movie series featured various actors portraying the detective. Swedish actor Warner Oland, who according to Lucas, credits his Asian appearance to Mongolian ancestry, popularized the role of Chan in the 1930s. The movies also featured Asian actor Keye Luke as Charlie Chan's "number one son," who attempted to help his dad solve cases but mostly served as comic relief in the films.
Lucas said he has a growing suspicion that the Fox Movie Channel is milking the controversy for publicity and ratings.
"I don't want to jinx anything, but the addition of that little caveat to Fox's statement - which is making Chan fans hopeful - makes me start to wonder if this whole controversy might not be someone's brilliant plan to bring more attention to the Chan festival," Lucas said, noting that Fox affiliates were still running ads on Tuesday of this week for the Chan film festival on the Fox Movie Channel.
"I'd like to believe that my feelings haven't been deliberately manipulated, but if it gets the movies back on TV in the long run - manipulate away," he added.
Several phone calls to the Fox Movie Channel seeking comment were not returned.
See Earlier Story:
Fox Movie Channel Bans Charlie Chan Movies (July 1, 2003)
E-mail a news tip to Marc Morano.
Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.
But you want them to cave into your pressure. And your pressure isn't public? LOL!
"Favorite pastime of man is fooling himself."
"He who squanders today talking about yesterday's triumphs, have nothing to boast of tomorrow."
"Grain of sand in eye may hide mountain."
"Small things sometimes tell very large story."
"Death one appointment we must all keep, and for which no time set."
"Man yet to be born who can tell what woman will or will not do."
"Impossible to miss someone who will always be in heart."
"Very difficult to explain hole in doughnut, but hole always there."
Maybe Fox Should check and see if the "Asian Associations" that are "offended" aren't all actually members of the AlA or Association of Liberal Asians, or Democrat Asians.
Maybe we should ban all movies because of our "sensitivities". I mean every movie has some kind of stereo-type in it. How about Laurel and Hardy? They should be banned because they are "offensive" to homeless people. The Three Stooges are offensive to white males. The Brady Bunch is offensive to women, because it has women in stereo-typical female roles and shows a woman in a subserviant role-Alice the house keeper. Sanford and Son will have to be taken off the air, as well as the Beverly Hillbillies. I Love Lucy will have to go too. While it has some positive portrayals of race with Ricky, The fact that Lucy is shown as repeatedly making mistakes and incompetent is offensive to women. She is shown as totally dependent on her husband wich won't do. The Flintstones can't be shown for some of the same reasons I Love Lucy will have to go. Bewitched is offensive to Wiccans particularly with Endora the mother in law of Darren. Just to be safe, remove all Classic TV and movies period.
Does any one else think it's funny that the people who have been screaming the loudest about book burning and censorship are the same ones who want to ban EVERYTHING?
Charlie Chan, the good-guy Chinese-American detective, along with his more Americanized son, would solve the case with Chinese-ly, while the dumb old Anglo LA police detective was clueless.
Quite the opposite of negative stereotypes such as Fu Manchu.
You can't make this stuff up! LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.