Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal alternative patriotism
WND ^ | July 2 2003 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 07/02/2003 4:12:44 PM PDT by perfect stranger

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On our nation's birthday, it is appropriate to honor the five men who did the most to defend our freedom in the last century. The names are easy to remember – they are the five men most loathed by liberals: Joseph McCarthy, J. Edgar Hoover, Richard Nixon, Whittaker Chambers and Ronald Reagan.

McCarthy died censured and despised at 48 years old, his name a malediction. Hoover is maligned for having been a mad spymaster and is lyingly smeared as a cross-dresser – by people who admire cross-dressers. Nixon was forced to resign the presidency in disgrace. Though persecuted in his day, Whittaker Chambers is not hated today only on a technicality: The MTV generation doesn't know who he is. They'd hate him too, but it would take research. By contrast, Ronald Reagan has prevailed over the left's campaign of lies only because the American people do remember him – so far.

Notwithstanding the left's fantastic lies, these men won a 50-year war because of the abiding anti-communism of the American people. These are the heroes of the Cold War, and all have been personally reviled for their trouble.

The left's shameful refusal to admit collaboration with one of the great totalitarian regimes of the last century – like their defense of Bill Clinton – quickly transformed into a vicious slander campaign against those who bore witness against them. Caught absolutely red-handed, liberals started in with their typical bellicose counterattacks. Half a century ago, Louis Budenz, an ex-communist informant, warned investigators that if they dared go after the Communist Party, they would be subjected to savage attacks, never "honest rebuttal." Unless the American people understood that, he said, all was lost.

Absurdly, liberals claim to hate J. Edgar Hoover because of their passion for civil liberties. The left's exquisite concern for civil liberties apparently did not extend to the Japanese. As President Franklin D. Roosevelt rounded up Japanese for the internment camps, liberals were awed by his genius. The Japanese internment was praised by liberal luminaries such as Earl Warren, Felix Frankfurter and Hugo Black. Joseph Rauh, a founder of Americans for Democratic Action – and celebrated foe of "McCarthyism" – supported the internment.

There was one lonely voice in the Roosevelt administration opposed to the Japanese internment – that of J. Edgar Hoover. The American Civil Liberties Union gave J. Edgar Hoover an award for wartime vigilance during World War II. It was only when he turned his award-winning vigilance to Soviet spies that liberals thought Hoover was a beast.

Liberals deemed it appropriate to throw Japanese citizens into internment camps on the basis of no evidence of subversive activity whatsoever. But it was outrageous for the FBI director to spy on high government officials taking their orders from Moscow. As we now know, Hoover didn't need to engage in much surveillance to know who the Soviet agents were – he already knew from decrypted Soviet cables.

Liberals sheltered communists, Hoover was on to them, so they called him a fag. With precisely as much evidence as they had for McCarthy's alleged homosexuality, the left giddily "gay"-baited J. Edgar Hoover. Their sensitivity to homophobia was matched only by their sensitivity to the civil rights of Japanese.

While Hoover was alive, any journalist who could have proved he was "gay" would have won a Pulitzer Prize. But they couldn't get Hoover on a jaywalking charge. Only after he was dead did liberals go hog-wild inventing lurid fantasies about Hoover showing up at Washington cocktail parties in drag (perhaps not recognizing their own Pamela Harriman).

In 2003, the U.S. Comedy Arts Festival put on a musical comedy about Hoover's apocryphal homosexuality in "J. Edgar! The Musical," written by Harry Shearer and Tom Leopold. While slandering a dead man with impunity, rich celebrities – in Aspen, Colo., no less – paid tribute to their own dauntless courage. For the second year in a row, the festival celebrated the First Amendment, giving its "Freedom of Speech Award" to millionaire leftist Michael Moore, in an event hosted by Joe Lockhart, former press secretary to a president whose IRS audited people who engaged in free speech against him. The executive director of the festival, Stu Smiley, said the purpose of the festival was "to reacquaint ourselves with people who have sacrificed for their right to express themselves."

Liberals' conception of sacrifice is rather broad, including:

to work for up to three weeks for less than $1 million;

and to not be showered with praise by Veterans of Foreign Wars while burning the American flag.

Americans should thank God that McCarthy, Hoover, Nixon, Chambers and Reagan were men enough to make real sacrifices.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter
It's so much easier to read with the FR format.
1 posted on 07/02/2003 4:12:44 PM PDT by perfect stranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger

2 posted on 07/02/2003 4:13:57 PM PDT by perfect stranger (You can't ping a user that doesn't exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Coulter hump... err I mean bump.
3 posted on 07/02/2003 4:23:02 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
"The American dream does not come to those who fall asleep.

But we are approaching the limits of what government alone can do.
Our greatest need now is to reach beyond government, and to enlist the legions of the concerned and the committed.
What has to be done, has to be done by government and people together or it will not be done at all. The lesson of past agony is that without the people we can do nothing; with the people we can do everything.
To match the magnitude of our tasks, we need the energies of our people -- enlisted not only in grand enterprises, but more importantly in those small, splendid efforts that make headlines in the neighborhood newspaper instead of the national journal.
With these, we can build a great cathedral of the spirit -- each of us raising it one stone at a time, as he reaches out to his neighbor, helping, caring, doing.
I do not offer a life of uninspiring ease. I do not call for a life of grim sacrifice. I ask you to join in a high adventure -- one as rich as humanity itself, and as exciting as the times we live in.
The essence of freedom is that each of us shares in the shaping of his own destiny.
Until he has been part of a cause larger than himself, no man is truly whole.
The way to fulfillment is in the use of our talents; we achieve nobility in the spirit that inspires that use.
As we measure what can be done, we shall promise only what we know we can produce, but as we chart our goals we shall be lifted by our dreams.
No man can be fully free while his neighbor is not. To go forward at all is to go forward together.

This means black and white together, as one nation, not two. The laws have caught up with our conscience. What remains is to give life to what is in the law: to ensure at last that as all are born equal in dignity before God, all are born equal in dignity before man."



http://www.americanpresidents.org/inaugural/36a.asp
4 posted on 07/02/2003 4:32:38 PM PDT by visualops (The only thing more painful than learning from experience, is not learning from experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Hoover. Hoover?
5 posted on 07/02/2003 4:35:00 PM PDT by rdb3 (Nerve-racking since 0413hrs on XII-XXII-MCMLXXI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
"You and I, as individuals, can, by borrowing, live beyond our means, but for only a limited period of time. Why, then, should we think that collectively, as a nation, we are not bound by that same limitation?

We must act today in order to preserve tomorrow. And let there be no misunderstanding -- we are going to begin to act, beginning today.

The economic ills we suffer have come upon us over several decades. They will not go away in days, weeks, or months, but they will go away. They will go away because we, as Americans, have the capacity now, as we have had in the past, to do whatever needs to be done to preserve this last and greatest bastion of freedom.

In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem.

From time to time, we have been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. But if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? All of us together, in and out of government, must bear the burden. The solutions we seek must be equitable, with no one group singled out to pay a higher price."


http://www.americanpresidents.org/inaugural/39a.asp
6 posted on 07/02/2003 4:36:25 PM PDT by visualops (The only thing more painful than learning from experience, is not learning from experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
BTTT
7 posted on 07/02/2003 7:49:38 PM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
You're slowing down
8 posted on 07/02/2003 7:51:04 PM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Hoover is maligned for having been a mad spymaster and is lyingly smeared as a cross-dresser – by people who admire cross-dressers.

Nobody portrays the LIEberals for the hypocrites they are better than Ann.

9 posted on 07/03/2003 1:48:38 AM PDT by Elkiejg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
Bump.
10 posted on 07/03/2003 8:02:07 AM PDT by presidio9 (RUN AL, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Please don't tell me you have a problem with Hoover for investigating MLK's Communist connections.
11 posted on 07/03/2003 5:01:18 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
It has nothing to do with his investigation(s) of MLK, Jr.
12 posted on 07/03/2003 8:03:38 PM PDT by rdb3 (Nerve-racking since 0413hrs on XII-XXII-MCMLXXI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Don't you love the way the tolerant ones call everyone who exposes them a homosexual? I thought they LIKED those people. Another great example of liberal tolerance.

BTW, this article was also posted at http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/030704/51/4l28s.html
13 posted on 07/06/2003 8:21:29 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/939649/posts?page=1
14 posted on 07/06/2003 8:23:13 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson