[DoughtyOne]

Wasn't the "boyfriend" a married man?

I am not certain, but if he was, she is deserving of criticism right along with anyone else who participated in such activity.

My point with Dr. Laura is this.  None of us is perfect.  If the fact that any of us has sinned disqualifies us from taking moral stands, then morals will have no advocates on the planet.

Where Dr. Laura's comments are within reason, they should be listened to and agreed with on merit.

Where extenuating circumstances exist, such as Laura not specificly posing for a porn concern, or perhaps not knowing a man is married, this should be taken into considertation.  On the other hand, standards do cut both ways.  If she did pose for a porn concern or did know the guy was married, she should have known better, and it is certainly fair to mention it.

[M. Peach]

Don't get me wrong - I agree with much of what she says - and I admire her strength of conviction - not that I necessariy agree with everything she says - however - the way she often passes judgment so harshly and in such a condescending way - leaves her open to judgement of her own personal history.

Overall - I like listening to her sometimes - it's entertaining and provacative - but like the old saying goes - "judge not lest ye be judged" (or something like that.)