missus clinton P.J. O'Rourked

weeklystandard.com ^ | 6.28.03 | Mia T

[Graewoulf]

Good Work! Keep the pressure on!

[ladyinred]

Mia, your post are always so entertaining and informative. You must work very hard at this!

The critique is one of the best and funniest I have read thus far. He really had us rolling in the aisles! Although I read this last night, you added your special touch to it making it even more enjoyable! Thanks!

[ntnychik]

Ping!

[Enterprise]

Bump for later reading. Good so far though!

[Mudboy Slim]

"Hillary Clinton's new memoir is more than 100,000 pages long. At least I think it is. There are only 562 page numbers, but you know how those Clintons lie. A mere ream of paper could not contain the padding that has gone into this tome. Hillary--with the help of at least six ghostwriters--nails the goose of a manuscript to the barn floor and force-feeds it with lint....And then there are the fulsome tales of official junkets--unimportant, uninteresting, uneventful, and unending. "I had given a lot of thought to how Chelsea and I should dress on the trip. We wanted to be comfortable, and, under the sun's heat, I was glad for the hats and cotton clothes I had packed."

To paraphrase the inimitable Mr. T, "I pity da fool..." whose life is so empty that they find the time and inclination to not only buy, but also to read the HildaBeast's braindead meanderings!! Thanks for posting O'Rourke's comments 'cuz I ain't much for his politics so I wouldn't have seen it unless I read it on FR.com. Good to see at least a few libs ain't drinkin' the Hitlery Kool-aid.

FReegards...MUD

[Swiss]

**Hillary failed the District of Columbia bar examination, but she passed in Arkansas--and "in the first jury trial I handled on my own, I defended a canning company against a plaintiff who found the rear end of a rat in the can of pork and beans he opened for dinner one night."**

Why didn't we hear that the smartest lady in the world (as we was told back in the 1990's) didn't pass the Bar in D.C.? Could she of gotten help with the Arkansas exam (Arkansas isn't a corrupt state is it?)

BTW Mia do you know of a site that lists every Clinton scandal and misdeed by date. There is so many that I suspect I could have a clinton scandal of the day when I post on other sites with liberals. A this day in Clinton history type of thing.

[WorkingClassFilth]

Bump!

[jla]

As always, wonderful job, Mia.

"I'm not a liberal, so I don't have an infinite grasp on things I know nothing about." -- P.J. O'Rourke

[cherry_bomb88]

Great Job, Mia!!!

Thanks for the ping, jla!!!

Mia, where do you find the time????

[Jeremiah Jr]

Hear, Here...

[Brian Allen]

Wow.

[Mia T]

CORRECTION PING

And because the missus scrupulously scrubbed from her memoir (and from her memory, some would add), all actionable particulars, dead as well as "living," the resultant Simon & Schuster soporific, Living History, i.e., the clintons minus the corruption, is a real snooze, by definition...

(Ironically, no amount of elbow grease will erase the greased palm; the underlying fraud of the "book deal" and the book, itself, are, forevermore, intrinsically bound.)

 

 

 

 

(MIKE LUCKOVICH, as interpreted by Mia T)

 

NOTE THE CBS--SIMON & SCHUSTER CONNECTION

 

 

[Pharmboy]

Your best yet! X42 and the WTC is chilling...

[Mia T]

The clintons are mediocre, banal characters, a big yawn but for their scandals.

And because the missus scrupulously scrubbed from her memoir (and from her memory, some would add), all actionable particulars, dead as well as "living," the resultant Simon & Schuster soporific, Living History, i.e., the clintons minus the corruption, is a real snooze, by definition...

(Ironically, no amount of elbow grease will erase the greased palm; the underlying fraud of the "book deal" and the book, itself, are, forevermore, intrinsically bound.)

MIA T,

 

Bill Clinton is getting $12 million for his memoirs; Hillary is getting $8 million dollars for hers, for a total of $20 million. Not bad for a couple that for eight years swore under oath they couldn't remember anything.

--anonymous

Buddy web sites quickly exploded in cyberspace. (Socks web sites, too, Socks would add.) Mrs. clinton, a long-time adherent of synergistic exploitation, "authored" an instant book about three groups favored for exploitation by the clintons: dogs, cats and children. "Dear Socks, Dear Buddy: Kids' Letters to the First Pets" was published by the clintons' personal agitprop-and-money-laundering machine, Simon & Schuster.

MIA T, Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers

 

YOO-HOO Mrs. clinton

A '68 Mustang is not exculpatory

 

by Mia T, 1-29-03

HALF A HOUSE, HALF A BRAIN: HALF A HOUSE, HALF A BRAIN:
Why we were compelled to hit on Simon & Schuster,our personal agitprop & money-laundering machine)

by Mia T

 

Hillary Clinton's equal and inapposite reactions seem to be, at first blush, instances of the immutable First Law of The Betrayed and Humiliated Wife: Outdo the errant hubby's doxy...at all cost.

Thus, Vanity Fair's glamorous Marilyn-Monroe spread of Monica's digitally reduced spread was answered by Vogue's lushly Elizabethan, gauzy-focus, hindquarter-cropped-pleated-and-flounced, Queen-Hillary-for-President cover.

And now we have Hillary Clinton doing a Martha Stewart, who herself, is purported to have been "done" by the aforementioned errant rogue (notwithstanding the plain fact that Martha is more well-known for her tarts than for being one).

Seems Hillary Clinton is now writing a book titled "An Invitation to the White House" in which she will follow the format of the Martha Stewart classic, "Entertaining", claim multifarious Martha-Stewart talents and wrap her indecorous and corrupt, backwoods, backroom style of White House "entertaining" in Martha-Stewart elegance and purity. (NB: Written years before Martha ImPloded.)

"The Clinton White House has been noted for the...innovation of its events," said Carolyn Reidy, president of Simon & Schuster's Trade Division, the book's publisher.

Hillary Clinton's spokeswoman, Marsha Berry, added that the book will focus on how the Clintons have "advanced the availability" of the White House by increasing the number and diversity of people; that it will "highlight the access that the Clintons have given to more people, more types of entertainment..."

It should be emphasized that it was without even a trace of irony or the slightest smirk that both women related the above.

On closer inspection, Hillary Clinton's bizarre behavior is more than simple Ivana Trump-eting. It is vulgar, compulsive, shameless, smarmy, contemptuous, demagogic, megalomaniacal, in-your-face naked clintonism.

It is one thing for the frumpy, chipmunk-cheek, huge-hindquarter fishwife to insinuate her image -- albeit Elizabethan-shrouded and low-res-clouded -- onto the cover of Vogue; but it is quite another for the corrupt harpy to trumpet White House access even as new charges emerge of the clintons' rapes and other predations, of the clintons' corrupt quid-pro-quo arrangements with a menacing and motley assortment of drug dealers, gun runners and nuclear weapons makers.

For Hillary Clinton to vaunt White House access just as the clintons' China treason is becoming increasingly, patently manifest to all requires a certain level of contempt for the people and for the country that is uniquely clinton.

Thank heaven for small favors...

Or as the real Martha Stewart would say,
"That is a good thing."

[backhoe]

...do you know of a site that lists every Clinton scandal and misdeed by date...

Been a while since I looked in depth, but try here:

DOWNSIDE LEGACY AT TWO DEGREES OF PRESIDENT CLINTON

[varon]

bump thingy

[jla]

Wow.

Terse, yet accurate, Brian.

[Mia T]

The clintons are mediocre, banal characters, a big yawn but for their scandals.

And because the missus scrupulously scrubbed from her memoir (and from her memory, some would add), all actionable particulars, dead as well as "living," the resultant Simon & Schuster soporific, Living History, i.e., the clintons minus the corruption, is a real snooze, by definition...

(Ironically, no amount of elbow grease will erase the greased palm; the underlying fraud of the "book deal" and the book, itself, are, forevermore, intrinsically bound.)

Mia T,

 

 

the logic of pathologic self-interest

Q ERTY6

ping!

 

December 22, 2000

 

Mrs. Clinton's Book Deal

 

Forum ï Join a Discussion on Editorials

rs. Clinton's Book Deal

We are sorry to see Hillary Rodham Clinton start her Senate career by selling a memoir of her years as first lady to Simon & Schuster for a near- record advance of about $8 million. The deal may conceivably conform to the lax Senate rules on book sales, though even that is uncertain. But it would unquestionably violate the tougher, and better, House rules, and it is an affront to common sense. No lawmaker should accept a large, unearned sum from a publisher whose parent company, Viacom, is vitally interested in government policy on issues likely to come before Congress ó for example, copyright or broadcasting legislation.

Mrs. Clinton's staggering advance falls just below the $8.5 million received by Pope John Paul II in 1994. We wish as a matter of judgment that she had not sought an advance but had voluntarily limited her payments to royalties on actual book sales, as the House now requires of its members. That way there would be no worry that she had been given special treatment in an effort to curry political favor.

The Senate will judge Mrs. Clinton's deal in the context of outmoded rules that, regrettably, still permit members to accept advance payments for their books provided they fall within "usual and customary" industry patterns. Mrs. Clinton held an open auction for her book, so the $8 million advance emerged from a process that presumably represented the industry's consensus about what the book would be worth. But Mrs. Clinton has a duty to reveal the entire contents of her contract so that the public and members of the Senate Ethics Committee can judge for themselves whether its terms fulfill her pledge to comply with existing Senate rules, inadequate though they are.

As it is, Mrs. Clinton will enter the Senate as a business associate of a major company that has dealings before many regulatory agencies and interests in Congress. It would have been far better if she had avoided this entanglement. As she above all others should know, not every deal that is legally permissible is smart for a politician who wants and needs to inspire public trust.

Only a few years ago Newt Gingrich, at that time the House speaker, accepted an ethically dubious $4.5 million book deal with a publishing house owned by Rupert Murdoch, an aggressively political publisher seeking help with his problems with federal regulators. This was the issue that ultimately forced Mr. Gingrich to abandon his advance, and led the House to ban all advance payments for members' books.

That is the right approach, and it would be nice if Republican critics of Mrs. Clinton's deal now devoted real energy to persuading the Senate to adopt the House rules for the future. Both bodies need maximum protection against entangling alliances between lawmakers and government favor- seekers now that nearly all major publishing houses are owned by large corporations with a lot of business before Congress.

Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company

 

 

"No one put all the pieces together."

Past Holds Little Explanation for The Meteoric Fall Of Jayson Blair
The Washington Post | Thursday, May 15, 2003; Page C01 | Paul Farhi, Washington Post Staff Writer

Q ERTY8 NYT's habitual failure to connect the dots^BUMP

My question for Pinch (him, he's dreaming) Sulzberger:

Mr. Sulzberger... Shortly after 9/11, you admitted to Brian Lamb (C-SPAN, Washington Journal, 11.30.01) that The Times' endorsement of clinton was based on clinton "policies, not achievements."

When you made that admission, were you following Abe Rosenthal's sage advice, ("When you're wrong in this profession, there is only one thing to do. And that is get right as fast as you can."), mindful of both the clintons' utter failure to protect us from terrorism, and The Times' prior "failure to connect the dots during the Holocaust,"... or were you merely covering your own corrupt, nepotistically-enabled, feckless rear?

 

 

CNNs of Commission, Rapist Demagogues and 9/11

the movie

The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime

Personal Agitprop-and-Money-Laundering Machine, Cozy-clintonoid-Interviews-of-the-Colmes-Kind-Scheme
Bury REAL "Living History"

Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent
 

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

[skinkinthegrass]

THANKS,..Good Stuff :)

...with as many files on Shrillay/Bubba Clinton...the Little Rock Mafia can't get them all...but, they'll try... :/